The DISH

Unbossed and unbought news and information you can use

Vol. 9 No. 32…Dedicated to the Dialogue on Race…August 11, 2006

 

 

Bit of History

Kyoto Protocol

World leaders at the 1st Earth Summit held in Stockholm, Sweden (1972) decided to gather every decade to discuss the planet's health. Their 1982 gathering in Nairobi, Kenya failed so miserably that it is not officially recognized as an Earth Summit.

In 1988, the UN created the International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). World scientists focused on climate change to ascertain whether the world was warming or cooling. The Toronto Conference on the Changing Atmosphere (1988) called the effect of climate change "second only to global nuclear war" and called on nations to cut 1988 greenhouse gas emissions 20% by 2005. The IPCC issued its first report in 1990. It pointed to human activity as a factor in the planet's warming, but needed more time and better technology to study it.

The Second Earth Summit held in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil led to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC); it called on the world to stabilize greenhouse gas emissions. The US signed and ratified the convention. US president George H.W. Bush negotiated an agreement to allow developing nations to increase emissions.

The 1995 Conference of Parties held in Berlin, Germany reviewed the adequacy of the Rio Convention's goals for stabilizing greenhouse gas emissions in light of the second IPCC report, which stated "the balance of evidence" pointed to a "discernable human influence on the global climate system."   This situation endangers humanity.

On July 25, 1997, the US Senate unanimously passed the Byrd-Hagel Resolution forbidding the nation to sign any protocol that "would result in serious harm to the economy of the United States." In December 1997, the Conference of Parties meeting in Kyoto, Japan decided the goals for greenhouse gas emissions set out at the Rio Convention were too weak to protect the planet. Kyoto called for a 5% reduction in 1990 greenhouse gas emissions over the period 2008-2012.

Countries were assigned different emission reduction targets to meet this global goal. On November 12, 1998, Vice President Al Gore signed Kyoto, promising to reduce US greenhouse gas emissions by 7%. President Bill Clinton did not submit the protocol to the Senate for ratification.

On July 29 2001 at COP VII held in Bonn, Germany, the world, except for the US and Australia, agreed to the rules for implementing Kyoto. George W. Bush made it clear Kyoto would not be submitted to the Senate for ratification.

On November 18, 2004, Russia ratified the protocol and satisfied the requirement for it to go into effect, i.e., ratified by the countries that collectively produced at least 55% of global 1990 greenhouse gas emissions. Kyoto went into effect ninety days later on February 16, 2005.

The US has come under criticism for its handling of the Kyoto Protocol and climate change. Under Bush, the US has downplayed climate change research already accepted by government scientists. Instead, its climate change position relied on watered down reports influenced by business lobbyists. According to State Department papers, "in June 2005, the administration thanked Exxon executives for the company's "active involvement" in helping to determine climate change policy." (Sources: www.greenpeace.ca, www.pewclimate.org, and www.straightdope.com)



Comments from the Bat Cave


With the start of school mere days away, I tried to get the Dark Knight-Batman/White Ninja/Zorro to say something witty, insightful or just plain nutty about it. He occupied his customary post - sitting on the edge of the bed with a joystick, when I approached. From his rapidly changing expression, I could tell he viewed conversation as an intrusion. Before any request could be posed, he confirmed my suspicion by saying, "This is not a good time grandma."





Intuit’s Vibe

Tetraktys VII

By Jan Haag

 

Empire never died.
Continuity, tradition, heritage, things are as they
ever were throughout history.

History, itself may mean,

"things as they are now."

For today, the rich get richer

and the poor get poorer.

To those who have is given,

to those who have not,

all is taken away.

 

Biblical lore, Republican doctrine,

the core of the capitalistic exploitation
of indigenous peoples.

Kill the buggers if they interfere with
the making of profits.
Steal their land, steal their water, knowledge,

livelihood, shoot the nameless, screaming.

Distort our news to make
the homeland cheer all native deaths

-- and our own enslavement.

 

I search and search

and hear eclectic reports on radio

not on the main media,

but on KEXP, KBCS mixed

as on NPR with the hideous screeching,

drumming, sentimental strumming now called music

-- as if enough noise could emphasis

or obscure man's sizzling, ubiquitous,

incomprehensible, hatred of, inhumanity

of man against man and woman.
Rape, murder, shock and awe bombings

– do they really need the tradition
of movie music to emphasize

or override the two second assaults

we feel like bullets penetrating our chests

with sound bytes, continuous, serious,

ratta tat tat, made unabsorbable by speed,

and endlessness -- compassion forbidden,
time for thought lost in the din of the music
and the much vaunted "objective voice."

Even the stock market, bull or bear,

crash (thousands of people made destitute)

or gain made moot by the non-stop

nervous stressful, jangling noise

of on the spot voices:  a little singing,

a little dancing, a few shouts,

a volley or two followed by
a certain-to-be-forgotten-barely

restrained-from-tears-voice in agony mourning

wives', children's, mothers', fathers' deaths

as the byte moves on,

back to the reporter's name, station ID,
rat-ta-tat-tat, next byte.


Lies are exposed, conspiracies are revealed,

cupidity beyond belief is mentioned,

and the byte moves along.

Not a pause, not a thought about the carnage

of our civilization, just a little mood music

helping us rejoice in our pit of amoral corruption

so wide and so deep

you can actually see China,

where we used to be threatened

by the sight of starving children.

Now they starve, sometimes on TV,

but media, with music, concerns itself

only with gross national product,

corporate profits, the Dow.


Things are as they were for The East India Company,

because we, O Democratic America,

want them that way.

A colony ourselves, we didn't get to share

in the (opium and other) profits from the last Empire,

but now we can imitate, emulate,

surpass the Colonial Empire of the British,

with a far more demonic (and
friendless) Empire of our own.  God bless
America,

we've become the Evil Empire incarnate.

 

 

 

Disgruntled wants to know: Former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan is generally credited with creating the easy credit that financed the housing bubble, a bubble his successor Ben Bernanke is bursting with rising interest rates. Even without Bernanke's assistance, the irrational exuberance in housing, just as in the case of Greenspan's tech bubble, was bound to end. With a decline in mortgage applications, stagnant home prices and rising existing and new home inventories, the deflation has begun. Question is, what impact will bursting the housing bubble have on consumer spending and the US economy?


Disgruntled says: With all the global attention focused on rising oil and gas prices, little has been said about what environmental activists see as a huge problem facing the world's drinkable water supply. For a number a years, there has been a push, particularly in developing countries, to privatize the water supply. Companies, such as Coca-Cola, have convinced these governments to allow their water sources to be privately managed as profit-making enterprises, rather than public goods. Since water is essential for life, these decisions have inevitably led to clashes between governments and the people. If the Earth is indeed warming, the demand for fresh water will grow exponentially, creating greater pressures. Privatizing water is unlikely to lead to an equitable distribution of this limited resource, rather it will engender greater violence.


Disgruntled feels: Broken! The US is fighting a multi-front war and foreign occupation on credit. Despite the extravagance of its naked aggression, the George W. Bush administration gave exorbitant tax cuts to the wealthy. Members of his Republican Party recently linked raising the minimum wage with giving the rich an even bigger tax break, digging its fiscal hole deeper. Unfortunately, it is not just its fiscal state that brings me so low, it is rather the low road the US has taken. While US mainstream media cheerleads US-led killing, whether in Iraq or Lebanon, the nation sinks into an abyss. Viewed with global hostility, it has lost trust and is more often than not seen as the bad guy rather than an honest broker. The US is broken; fixing it will not be easy. In the meantime, they hate us with reason.






News You Use

An Inconvenient Truth


An Inconvenient Truth, a Paramount Classics and Participant Productions film, is directed by Davis Guggenheim. A hit at the Sundance Film Festival, the film features former Vice President and 2000 presidential candidate Al Gore.


Gore skillfully presents an array of facts and information and exposes misconceptions and myths about global warming. The data suggest humanity faces a ticking time bomb. Computer projections made by scientists at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration in
Boulder, Colorado show Earth is warming, which causes extreme storms and other severe atmospheric disruptions.


After the 2005 storm season and the current deadly heat wave gripping parts of
Europe and North America, An Inconvenient Truth delivers a timely message about global warming. While warning of potential disaster, the film offers a sense of hope in worldwide action. An Inconvenient Truth calls on everyone to protect the Earth and save humanity, the greatest moral challenge facing civilization.







DISHing It Up Hot!

On the “R” Word

By Dot

George W. Bush recently deigned to speak at the NAACP Annual Convention. It was his first appearance as US President before the nation's oldest civil rights organization. Why the NAACP wanted him to speak remains a mystery. Even without Hurricane Katrina, his tenure has been marked by a string of bad news for the black community. Since Bush came to power, the black community has endured conditions, if suffered by the entire nation, would be called recession or depression.

In his NAACP speech, Bush candidly acknowledged much work needed to be done to improve the black economic situation, but he declared progress had been made, given the programs enacted by his administration He specifically mentioned "No Child Left Behind, the faith-based initiative and increase in black home ownership.  Bush ignored the double digit black unemployment rate, rising cost of living, high foreclosure rates and declines in real black median family income that have occurred on his watch.

In July, the national unemployment rate rose for the first time in months to 4.8%. Many observers have long suspected the federal government's numbers did not truly reflect employment conditions on the ground with outsourcing, H1-B visas, illegal immigration, downsizing and offshoring reducing the number of jobs available. Coupled with anemic job growth for middle and low income families, historically high budget and trade deficits, a deflating housing bubble, etc., informed economists dare use the "R" word with respect to the US economy. They see no way, given the extraordinary confluence of bad economic data, to avoid the coming reckoning.

Historically, when the US economy experienced a recession, the black community experienced conditions that spelled depression. Forecasts of recession on the US economic horizon are looked on with certain trepidation among black Americans.



Politics Y2K6

Deficit Deceit


Like any successful criminal enterprise, the
US government keeps two sets of books. The one it shares with the public generally reflects better fiscal health than the one it keeps hidden. During the Clinton administration, the practice was used to project budget surpluses as "far as the eyes could see." Under George W. Bush, the US government used deflated deficit numbers to justify tax cuts for the wealthy. Some conservative talking heads try to make it a sound fiscal decision even with fighting wars of choice and foreign occupation on two fronts.


In the August 3, 2006 edition of USA Today, Dennis Cauchon's "What's the real deficit?" (www.usatoday.com/money/2006-08-02-deficit-usat_x.htm) brought home the magnitude of the deception and raised questions about the health of the economy. The two sets of books- one produced by the Bush administration and Congress and the other by the US Treasury Department- are separated by billions of dollars. According to Citizens for Tax Justice, "The real budget deficit for fiscal 2006 won't be $296 billion but more like $470 billion; the $174 billion borrowed from the Social Security Trust Fund to fund government programs was not included in the administration and congressional budget numbers."


As Cauchon points out, the budget numbers reported in the US Treasury Department's audited statement are based on standard accounting practices. And, according to those numbers, "the government has run a deficit of $2.9 trillion since 1997," but the deficit shared with the public showed only $729 billion. These numbers raise serious questions for the future, because bills come due.


If the
US government was a US household run like this, when the bills for things purchased on credit come due and there are insufficient funds, a broke family faces foreclosure and bankruptcy. Foreclosure rates are up across the country. Can an entire nation suffer a similar fate? Or, will it resort to more aggressive tactics to solve its financial problems. Individuals have been known to commit crimes to stave off hunger, ruination or pure greed.


Check out Cauchon's article on line at USA Today and visit www.CTJ.org for more about the looming dangers of deficit deceit.




Mailbox: E-Mails, Faxes and Telephone Calls


Email www.dailykos.com The Beaver Creek Conference and the Road to Armageddon by BooMan23...In my opinion, Dick Cheney is the most dishonest politician in America...he has less regard for the factual basis of what he says than anyone I've ever observed. ..sometimes he says what he means (which is a form of truth) and everyone kind of misses it. In a speech on Inauguration Day 2005, Vice President Cheney warned bluntly that Iran was "right at the top" of the administration's list of "trouble spots"--and that Israel "might well decide to act first" by attacking Iran. The Israelis, he added in an obvious swipe at moderates in the State Department, would "let the rest of the world worry about cleaning up the diplomatic mess afterward."


Email www.uruknet.info/?p=25368 Did you know that non-Jewish Israelis cannot buy or lease land in
Israel? Did you now that cars owned by Palestinians are color coded to distinguish Jews from non-Jews? Did you know Palestinians are not allowed to move from one city, say Gaza to Bethlehem, to another without first getting a 'visa' from Israel? Did you know that Israel allots 85% of the water resources for Jews and the remaining 15% is divided among all Palestinians in the territories? For example in Hebron, 85% of the water is given to about 400 Jewish settlers, while 15% must be divided among Hebron's 120,000 Palestinians? Did you know that Israel routinely confiscates Palestinian bank accounts, businesses and land and refuses to pay compensation to those who suffer confiscation?


Email www.nytimes.com Left Behind Economics…By Paul Krugman... I'd like to say that there's a real dialogue taking place about the state of the
US economy, but the discussion leaves a lot to be desired. In general, the conversation sounds like this: Bush supporter: "Why doesn't President Bush get credit for a great economy? I blame liberal media bias." Informed economist" "But it's not a great economy for most Americans. Many families are actually losing ground, and only a very few affluent people are doing really well."


Email craven_j@hotmail.com we are programmed to believe George W. Bush is a Christian instead of Aristotle's tyrant--"A tyrant must put on the appearance of uncommon devotion to religion. Subjects are less apprehensive of illegal treatment from a ruler whom they consider god-fearing and pious." Pretending to take the moral high ground, he resists calls for a
Middle East cease-fire. Feigning a love of life, he calls on Israel to try to limit civilian casualties. My God--what a monster!

 

 

|| 2006 Issues || The DISH ||