The DISH

Unbossed and unbought news and information you can use

Volume 9 Issue 25…Dedicated to the Dialogue on RaceJune 23, 2006

Intuit’s Vibe

Hypocrisy

By Neil Harding McAlister

 

A rocky desert stretches far

To distant mountains, brown and bare.

A waif, abandoned in the dust,

Wipes flies out of her matted hair.

Her threadbare misery we see,

A poignant vignette on TV,

So aged beyond her seven years!

The interviewer swallows tears.

 

In her short life she’s known no life

But death and war. Now all alone,

This dolly never clutched a doll,

She’s never had a loving home.

A war-embittered TV host

Asks this poor wretch what she wants most,

And strains to hear what she has said.

One plaintive word she whispers: “Bread.”

 

From half a world away we watch,

Warm, fat voyeurs in safe, clean homes.

Our indignation is a sham,

Decrying pain that’s not our own.

Though we condemn with righteous rage

Injustice in the modern age,

Words without deeds shall always be

Contemptible hypocrisy.

 

God damn our nations! damn our flags!

And damn religion, every creed!

In pained disgust God turns His back

On men inured to this child’s need.

Whatever pious words we say,

Our empty words won’t wipe away

The tears of children, forced to dwell

In our world’s bitter, man-made hell.

 

About Me: I am a physician from Ontario, Canada who specializes in Internal Medicine. My hobbies include writing, collecting and publishing rhyming, metrical poetry. In 2005, I published "New Classic Poems" - an anthology of the works of 54 living poets. My latest anthology, "Rhyme and Reason," is in press right now. My poetry web site is at www.durham.net/~neilmac/travelerstales.htm. Please send comments about this poem to neilmac@durham.net.





Hood Notes

Ugly American II?


Since its inception in 2001, the Pew Global Attitudes Project, which is principally funded by the Washington-based Pew Charitable Trusts, has conducted thirteen (13) major projects on issues, attitudes and trends shaping America and the world. Released June 13, 2006, its latest opinion poll surveyed nearly 17,000 people in 15 countries, including the US. Conducted March 31-May14, respondents were asked their opinion on issues from bird flu to war.

An increasingly unpopular war, as the conflict in Iraq entered its fourth year, the US' image fell further. Even among its allies, favorable views of the US declined as did support for the war on terror. In Britain, only 30% of the respondents feel the conflict has made the world safer. Despite increasing concern, particularly among non-Muslim nations, about Iran's nuclear ambitions, the US occupation of Iraq was cited by majorities in 10 of 14 nations surveyed as having made the world a more dangerous place.

In classic ugly American fashion, many respondents expressed largely negative feelings toward George W. Bush and his administration's policies. On the other hand, their feelings about Americans in general were positive. Led by Japan (82%) and Britain (69%), majorities in 7 of 14 countries polled viewed Americans favorably. Majorities in just two countries, India and Nigeria, expressed confidence in Bush. For the complete report, visit http://pewglobal.org.





Bit of History

John Maynard Keynes (1883-1946)


The son of noted economist John Neville Keynes, John Maynard was born in Cambridge, England on June 5, 1883. Educated at Eton and King's College, he first majored in mathematics, but later turned his attention to philosophy and economics. After graduation, Keynes entered civil service and worked in the India Office (1906-1908).


On returning to England, Keynes secured a fellowship at Cambridge, where he lectured on economics and money. Recognized for his brilliance, Keynes became editor of the Economic Journal, Britain's most distinguished economic publication; he held the post for thirty-three years. Keynes taught at Cambridge and served as bursar of King's College until his death.


In addition to teaching, Keynes served on the Royal Commission on Indian Currency and Finance (1913-1914) and in the Treasury (1915-1919). He attended the Paris Peace Conference (1919) as principal representative of the Treasury and deputy for the chancellor of the exchequer on the Supreme Economic Council. In June 1919, he left the post in protest against the Versailles Treaty's reparations clauses; he published The Economic Consequences of the Peace the same year. From 1921-1938, he was chairman of the National Mutual Life Assurance Society and ran an investment company.


Keynes published his most important economic work, The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money in 1936. Representing a significant departure from neo-classical orthodoxy, which held that there is a natural tendency for the economy to reach full-employment equilibrium, i.e., supply equals demand, Keynes' work revolutionized economic thinking. He showed that the economy can reach and maintain equilibrium at a level of output less than full employment. To address economic depression, Keynes advocated reducing the bank interest rate to stimulate investment, a progressive income tax system to make incomes more equal and thereby increase the percentage of aggregate income that people spend on consumption, and government investment through public works and other mechanisms when private investment declines. Keynes' prescription for addressing depression became known as Keynesianism or the new economics.


A member of the Macmillan Committee on Finance and Industry (1929-1931), Keynes was appointed to the Treasury Consultative Council (1940). In How to Pay for the War (1940), Keynes advocated a system of forced or deferred savings to avoid wartime inflation and to insulate the economy against possible post-war slumps. Influential in Britain's wartime budget matters, Keynes was made a director of the Bank of England (1941), although he was a frequent critic of the institution's orthodox fiscal policies. In 1942, he was named 1st Baron Keynes of Tilton.


Keynes headed the British delegation to the United Nations Monetary and Financial Conference at Bretton Woods, NH (July 1944), which led to the International Monetary Stabilization Fund and the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (World Bank). Prior to his death, Keynes was appointed a governor of the International Monetary Fund and World Bank.


Generally considered Britain's most brilliant and influential modern economist, Keynes' works include Indian Currency and Finance (1913), A Treatise on Probability (1921), A Tract on Monetary Reform (1923), The Economic Consequences of Mr. Churchill (1925), and The End of Laissez-Faire (1926). Baron Keynes died on April 21, 1946 in Tilton, Sussex. (Sources: www.econlib.org, www.bartleby.com and http://econ161.berkeley.edu)





News You Use

Legacies


For six months beginning June 16, 2006, the New York Historical Society will host Legacies: Contemporary Artists Reflect on Slavery. Illustrating that art can give expressive form to history, bridging past and present, the exhibition features the works of many prominent artists as they explore themes in the context of American slavery.

In addition, the exhibit seeks to remind visitors that slavery continues to affect millions of people around the world. Featured artists include iAbolish members Simon Deng, Francis Bok, Beatrice Fernando and Abuk Bak - survivors of modern slavery. They will be featured in a video testimony entitled "New Captivity Narratives."

Legacies: Contemporary Artists Reflect on Slavery will run June 16, 2006 - January 7, 2007 at New York Historical Society, 170 Central Park West, New York, NY 10024. For more information about the exhibition, visit www.nyhistory.org. For additional information about the American Anti-Slavery Group- iAbolish, contact Diane Nguyen at action@iabolish.com.




Politics Y2K6

Hypocrites 'R Us


"Americans believe that no one who works hard for a living should have to live in poverty. A job should lift you out of poverty, not keep you in it A worker paid $5.15 an hour would earn $10,700 a year, almost $6,000 below the poverty line for a family of three." Sen. Edward M. Kennedy (D-MA).

On June 13, Congress quietly accepted a $3,300 cost of living adjustment (COLA), which raised their annual salaries to $168,500. This new salary is approximately $81 per hour, provided they actually worked 40 hours a week. Of course, members of Congress rarely work more than a few days for a few hours each week. In reality, they work fewer hours than a Wal-Mart part-time employee earning the $5.15 minimum wage with no benefits.

On top of their generous salaries, members of Congress enjoy other perks and benefits, including the best health care and retirement package available. The recent COLA represents the seventh time since 1997 that Congress has given itself a pay raise.

Epitomizing the level of hypocrisy that is commonplace in Washington, DC, the Republican-controlled Senate killed a proposed bill on Wednesday (June 21, 2006) to increase the minimum wage, which has not been raised in nearly a decade. On Tuesday, House Republican leaders made it clear they did not intend to allow a vote on the measure.

The Kennedy proposal would have increased the minimum wage to $5.85 beginning 60 days after the legislation was enacted. A year later, it would increase to $6.55 an hour, with a third increase to $7.25 the following year. For now, the $5.15 hourly pay floor remains in effect.

Arguments for and against raising the minimum wage fell along predictable lines. From a state that believes in exploiting all labor, especially illegal immigrants, Sen. Johnny Isakson, (R-GA), argued it would cost some low wage earners their jobs. He described the debate as a difference in philosophies. His philosophy, the conservative orthodoxy buried by Keynes, believes in the marketplace, while those that support raising the minimum wage believes the government knows better and that topdown mandates work.

In reality, the debate put on display the elitist-greed-exploitation hypocrisy that currently rules this country. The nation's rulers believe for a chosen few, more is better; for the common people, more spells doom for the country. Members of Congress, like their wealthy backers, deserve and need more to survive and thrive, while $5.15 an hour, which has been eroded by inflation, is sufficient for working poor Americans. Their hypocrisy knows no bounds.



DISHing It Up Hot!

On Wal-Mart Redux

By Dot


Several issues back, I wrote a short article on Wal-Mart. I explained my decision to end my boycott and shop at the mega-discount store, which recently opened blocks from my front door. A few weeks later, a reader wrote to urge me to reconsider, listing all the reasons I initially embraced to boycott Wal-Mart, while ignoring those I used to end it.


I placed the email in a respond folder, where it sat as I tried to come up with something that did not make me sound like the hypocrite the reader suggested I would be, if I failed to stop shopping at Wal-Mart. In the interim, my computer crashed twice because of some "registry" problem. (Has anyone else experienced this problem?) The response folder got lost somewhere in cyberspace.


Beyond my original remarks, I still have no cogent points for that reader. A hypocrite, I continue to shop at Wal-Mart. In the final analysis, I am like most folks, filled with contradictions. I confess; I have idiosyncrasies. I have come to rely on Wal-Mart's low prices on some items and frankly rely on it to stretch my household's limited budget.


To all other readers, if I failed to respond to your request, comments, etc., please resend.





Disgruntled wants to know: When John Maynard Keynes proposed the use of government spending to stimulate a depressed economy, conservatives adamantly opposed any governmental intervention. Convinced the economy would naturally reach equilibrium, conservatives, such as US Treasury Secretary Andrew Mellon (1929-1932), opposed the New Deal programs of the Franklin D. Roosevelt administration that created jobs to employ average Americans, helped reduce national poverty and ended the Great Depression. The current US administration claims to be conservative, yet it is engaging in historically high deficit spending, is fighting an expensive foreign war on two fronts on credit and has cut taxes for the wealthiest individuals. What exactly is conservative about the economic paradigm being pursued by the Bush administration?


Disgruntled feels: Torn! Since age 18, I have voted in every election. The last two presidential elections significantly dampened my enthusiasm for the "democratic" process. With deep concerns about electronic voting, I am wondering if I should bother. Georgia has all electronic-no paper trail voting. Moreover, there is my growing suspicion that there is not a dime's worth of difference between the two major political parties. Their actions say they are obligated to and owned by the same multinational corporations and big campaign contributors that run this country. Torn between not going to the polls to vote at all and casting a ballot for the lesser of two evils, I declare, a pox on both their parties.


Disgruntled says: According to mainstream news reports, Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald does not plan to indict Karl Rove in the Valerie Plame investigation. Fresh from news of his reprieve, Rove ridiculed Democrats for falling back on the party's old pattern of 'cutting and running.' Rep. John Murtha, who appeared on Meet the Press with Tim Russert, responded by criticizing Rove and others who can sit on their fat backsides in air-conditioned offices and say, 'Stay the course,' while others do all fighting and dying. Murtha is right! Staying the course is not a plan. It is an unsavory recipe for more death and destruction. Most of the world, including US citizens by a two-to-one margin, want a change in direction. Bring our boys home!




Mailbox: E-Mail, Faxes and Phone Calls


Email www.truthout.org Their Barbarism, and Ours...There is no doubt in the slightest that "the words of horror used by John Burns to describe the 'barbaric murders' were totally appropriate. The problem," writes Norman Solomon, "is that Burns and his mass-media colleagues don't talk that way when the cruelties are inflicted by the US military. When journalists maintain a flagrant double standard in their language - allowing themselves appropriate moral outrage when Americans suffer but tiptoeing around what is suffered by victims of the US military - the media window on the world is tinted a dark red-white-and-blue, and the overall result is more flackery than journalism."


Email rballan@twcny.rr.com The DLC (Democratic Leadership Council) frequently comes up in discussions of Democratic Party politics. But do you know what this organization is really about? Do you know who the founding members were? Do you know who and what funds it? Do you know what its ideology is? Probably not. The DLC is a Trojan horse. It is the means by which the right wing of the American politics has infiltrated and subverted the Democratic Party. The DLC's "New Democrats" are really conservative Republicans, spending big money from ultra-conservative donors, while wrapping themselves in Democratic Party rhetoric, in order to implement policies that are destroying the US middle class and furthering the right-wing agenda. You really can't understand what has happened unless you understand the role of the DLC and "New Democrats" in destroying us.


Email bushbuster04@yahoo.com I was listening to Senator Durbin presenting a case for raising the minimum wage. He indicates that historically minimum wage raised was followed by an improvement in the economy. In apparent confirmation Illinois recently raised their minimum wage and the state economy is doing good. I see a simple reason why the economy should follow upward. We put considerable amount of money into the hands of the needy, who spend that money immediately and COMPLETELY, circulating it for everyone's benefit. Corporations (that resist and pay Congress to deny the raise) increase their production and staff to reach for that extra money floating around. Republican politicians tell us the tax cut that enriches the rich, even with its trickle down effect will ultimately boost the economy. The rich have no urgency to spend their new windfall, if they spend any of it. In the meantime the money that the Government might have spent boosting circulation, has been taken out of the system.


Email www.gregpalast.com African-American Voters Scrubbed by Secret GOP Hit List...Massacre of the Buffalo Soldiers...By Greg Palast...As reported by Democracy Now...The Republican National Committee has a special offer for African-American soldiers: Go to Baghdad, lose your vote. A confidential campaign directed by GOP party chiefs in October 2004 sought to challenge the ballots of tens of thousands of voters in the last presidential election, virtually all of them cast by residents of Black-majority precincts. Files from the secret vote-blocking campaign were obtained by BBC Television Newsnight, London. They were attached to emails accidentally sent by Republican operatives to a non-party website. One group of voters wrongly identified by the Republicans as registering to vote from false addresses: service men and women sent overseas.

|| 2006 Issues || The DISH ||