The DISH

Unbossed and unbought news and information you can use

Vol. 14 No. 5…Dedicated to the Dialogue on Race…January 31, 2011

 

Bit of History

Vandana Shiva



The influences that shaped Vandana Shiva's life began at her birth on November 5, 1952. Nurtured in the ancient city of Dehradun, India, nestled in the Himalayan Mountains, Vandana was the pride of her forest conservationist father and agronomist mother and a community deeply respectful of nature. She attended St. Mary's School in Nainital and the Convent of Jesus and Mary in Dehradun, where she aspired to be a scientist. After receiving her B.S. in Physics, she pursued a M.A. in philosophy at the University of Guelph (Ontario, Canada). She completed her Ph.D. in Quantum Theory Physics at the University of Western Ontario in 1979.

 

Shiva's physics background and love of nature led her to question the impact of science and technology on the environment. For answers she enrolled in inter-disciplinary research in science, technology and environmental policy at the Indian Institute of Science and the Indian Institute of Management in Bangalore. There she joined with other women in the nonviolent Chipko movement (1970), which adopted the strategy of forming human chains around trees to prevent their felling.

 

During this period, Shiva became an outspoken critic of the "Green Revolution," which sought to alleviate hunger by improving crop performance with irrigation, fertilizers, pesticides, and mechanization. She articulated her views on this and many other subjects in over 500 papers in leading scientific and technical journals, as well as 20 books. "Principally, the Green Revolution was supposed to bring Western technology to the aid of Third World farmers. But instead of wealth, the new high yielding seeds brought poverty and environmental destruction" (Wheat, 1995).

 

Shiva argued for the wisdom of traditional farming practices through her foundation --the Research Foundation for Science, Technology and Ecology (RFSTE). Founded in 1982, this institute is concerned with biodiversity and led her to the creation in 1991 of Navdanya (nine seeds) to protect the diversity of native seeds. RFSTE is in the forefront of the battle over Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) and Biodiversity; it successfully challenged the biopiracy of neem (the tree's fruits and seeds are pressed into vegetable oil), basmati (rice) and wheat. Besides her activism, Shiva has also served on expert groups of government on Biodiversity and IPR legislation.


Along with being a national movement to protect the diversity and integrity of living resources, RFSTE and Navdanya encourage local farmers to reject political and economic pressures that may endanger India's natural biodiversity, especially native seed. These groups also promote organic farming and fair trade. Navdanya's efforts have resulted in conservation of more than 2000 rice varieties from all over India; it has established 34 seed banks in 13 states and boasts membership of more than 70,000 farmers.

 

Dr. Shiva is one of the leaders and board members of the alter-globalization solidarity movement known as the International Forum on Globalization, (along with Jerry Mander, Edward Goldsmith, Ralph Nader, Jeremy Rifkin, et al.). An opponent of the so-called Green Revolution, Shiva has mounted international campaigns against Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs). She has assisted grassroots organizations in Africa, Asia, Latin America, Ireland, Switzerland, and Austria to make changes in practices and paradigms of agriculture and food production. Dr. Shiva argues that "Genetically modified organisms (GMOs), such as herbicide resistant and Bt crops, increase the need for chemicals to combat resulting super weeds and super pests, create monocultures by decreasing biodiversity through genetic pollution, and destroy farmers' freedom with patent monopolies and dependency on non-renewable seeds."


She denounced the new "miracle" Golden Rice, developed to prevent blindness due to Vitamin A deficiency, because her research indicates that it results from pesticides destroying "weeds" that have essential vitamins. Golden Rice, Shiva adds, is "based on a false premise," since "it will meet less than one per cent of the required daily intake of essential vitamins" (Shiva, 2000).

 

Dr. Shiva started Bija Vidyapeeth in Doon Valley (2004) in collaboration with Schumacher College, U.K., an international college for sustainable living. Dubbed an "ecofeminist," in some quarters, Dr. Shiva has published several books and articles that helped redefine perceptions of Third World women. Her first book, "Staying Alive" (1988) set the edge in getting around debilitating stereotypes of agrarian women. In 1990 she wrote a report for the UN's FAO on Women and Agriculture entitled, "Most Farmers in India are Women." She founded the gender unit at the International Centre for Mountain Development (ICIMOD) in Kathmandu and was a founding Board Member of the Women Environment and Development Organization (WEDO).

 

Dr. Shiva has received over 15 national and international awards for ecology awareness and environmental preservation, including the Earth Day International Award in 1993, the International Award of Ecology in 1997, the Order of the Golden Ark, Global 500 Award of the UN, the Lennon Ono Grant for Peace and the Sydney Peace Prize 2010. She also serves on the boards of many organizations, including the World Future Council, the International Forum on Globalization and Slow Food International. (Sources: http://www.bio.davidson.edu, http://en.wikipedia.org and www.bbc.co.uk)





Politics Y2K11

Food Fight

By John Burl Smith



"Food fight" is a western term that invokes scenes such as National Lampoon's Animal House, where John Belushi incites students to throw food as projectiles at others in a collective chaotic display of spontaneous behavior. Presented as comic relief, contrarily, this scene conveys an utter disregard for the importance of food in the daily life and death dramas of desperate people played out in Third World nations as they struggle to obtain sufficient nutrition. "Food fight" in this context is stripped of any humorous idiomatic qualities.


Emerging from WWII, Americans gave little consideration to food. Moreover, they thought even less about what producing it did to their bodies, their society and the planet, until food price inflation and books critical of industrial agriculture became kitchen table discussions in the early 1970s. Most Americans felt the tremendous postwar increases in farm productivity -- made possible by fertilizers and pesticides (derivatives of fossil fuel) and changes in agricultural policies that boosted yields of commodities (mainly corn and soy) meant America would never have food security problems.

 

However, the "oil crisis" of 1972 taught Americans and the rest of the world that cheap food may be good politics that comes at significant costs to the environment, public health, the public purse, even to the culture. Today these "chickens have come home to roost" in the "food fight" as rising prices and sustainability problems have come back to bite humanity in its proverbial rear. Journalists, authors and movie producers have served the public a diet that nourished their understanding of the connections between human and environmental cost that are associated with methods of industrial food production, agricultural policy, food borne illness, childhood obesity and, most notability, a greater demand on family income.


Cheap food has been an indispensable pillar of the modern economy, but now it is the aggressor in the fight for food security. This irony is an oxymoron in industrialized nations where dieting is necessary to combat obesity, conversely Third World populations are starving while gorging on empty calories supplied by the West. Speculators and nutrition profiteers such as Monsanto, Cargill and BASF supported by organizations like the WTO, IMF and World Bank form the skirmish line in the battle for food security and sustainable agriculture. They have sown a harvest that has grown into an international food fight in which humanity will reap a whirlwind. Previously, scenarios like the Project for A New American Century (PNAC), projected oil, nuclear weapons or terrorism as the catalysis for WWIII, but recent events indicate that food may supplant those factors as the impetus for belligerency.

 

This may seem an odd statement to make about something people think of in benign terms and with so much of the West's rhetoric aimed at Iran. But when one considers that in China -- people spend 50% of every dollar on food and prices were up 5% in November alone -- the government has imposed new export taxes to keep critical supplies -- grains and fertilizer in country -- the focus on food is understandable. Emerging markets like India, where people spend 70% of their income on food and the price is up 18%, rising prices are felt more keenly.

 

Other emerging market countries are being hit even harder by raising food prices. Indonesia's president asked people to grow their own chili peppers and other vegetables. And the South Korean government-- which borders North Korea which is already experiencing starvation -- recently released emergency stores of cabbage, pork, mackerel, radish, and other staples. Several countries in Africa are in the clutches of rising food prices and dwindling supplies.

 

Kenyan farmers near Nairobi are facing severe consequences as the amaranthus and haricot beans' planting season arrived and the cost of food and fertilizer spiked. Most can plant only half their acreage, which means even less food on a continent already weakened by drought, political unrest and rising prices. Oxfam, a British-based aid group, estimates that this year economic chaos has pulled an additional 119 million people below the poverty line.


Stephen Muchiri, head of the Eastern Africa Farmers Federation, says "The amount of money spent for the U.S. and Europe bailouts -- is enough to feed the poor in Africa for three years." Director-General, Jacques Diouf, U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization, who worries about cuts in aid to agriculture in developing countries and protectionist trade measures intended to counteract financial turmoil, estimated in 2007 that "923 million people were seriously undernourished." Four years later the number more than likely has quadrupled, as 36 countries are still in dire need of emergency food assistance. He warns developing countries of "a looming disaster next year if countries do not make food security a top priority."


U.N. officials predict that famine is gripping millions in Ethiopia and Somalia, threatening starvation by the end of the year. Nearly 10 million people will need food aid due to rampant political instability, food insecurity driven by skyrocketing prices, devaluation of local currencies and drought. "Along one road leading out of Somalia's capital, Mogadishu, more than 300,000 people have been living under tarps and trees for more than a year and with little access to food or fresh water. There is a 400% rise in children showing signs of malnutrition: listless and withdrawn, arms and legs growing thinner, skin peeling off as it dies, and finally bodies swelling from severe protein deficiency ," reports Susan Sandars, a spokeswoman of Doctors Without Borders.


Underscoring the urgency, UN Secretary-General Ban Ki Moon posted a letter to US media warning that food shortages are forcing prices to rise with devastating consequences for the world's most vulnerable communities. He wrote, "Millions of people are at risk of starvation as global food stocks have fallen to their lowest levels in decades." An undisputable lesson of history is "people will not willingly starve;" doubters need only remember Louis XVI and Maria Antoinette. Food riots are increasing daily in such vulnerable nations as Algeria, Bangladesh, Egypt, Ethiopia, Haiti, Jordan, Mauritania, Morocco, Mozambique, Tunisia, and Yemen, to name a few.

 

Shaky is the government that rests on an empty bread basket. The Tunisian strongman Zine El Abidine Ben Ali, who stepped down after 23 years in power, knows this maxim all too well. Thought to be as solid as a pyramid a week ago, President Hosni Mubarak's 28 year tenure now teeters, rocked by the quaking rumblings of stomach pangs in Egypt. For the want of bread, a kingdom may be lost. (Sources: www.reuters.com, www.towardfreedom.com, www.washingtonpost.com, and www.dailywealth.com)







News You Use

Profits and Food

By John Burl Smith



An intriguing 2-part article by Ian Angus entitled Capitalism, Agribusiness and the Food Sovereignty Alternative (6/27/10) echoes the thesis of my first novel Archangel: A Hip Hop Vision of Love and the Battle of Good Versus Evil. During its writing in 2006, I envisioned the story line as a farfetched science fiction which now seems more like "art imitating life." Archangel's plot emerges out of several back stories of people caught in the grip of a manufactured food crisis, much like the poor today, as underground heroes fight to save a starving world. Greedy corporations that are tampering with the world's food supply conspire to reduce people to being only a source of profits. Angus is not as melodramatic in his presentation as Archangel, but he essentially makes the same point.

 

Angus begins by commending Venezuela and President Hugo Chavez, the first to respond to food riots in Haiti with 364 tons of badly needed food, for the proper action to such a humanitarian crisis. "The people of Haiti were suffering from the attacks of the empire's global capitalism, which calls for genuine and profound solidarity from all of us."


Wagging his finger at other nations as hypocrites, Angus points out that though aid in such situations is necessary, it is only a stopgap. "To truly address the problem of world hunger, we must understand and then change the system that causes it. First, we must understand that there is no shortage of food in the world today. Study after study has shown that global food production has consistently outstripped population growth, and that there is more than enough food to feed everyone."

 

According to the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), enough food is produced in the world to provide over 2800 calories a day to everyone -- substantially more than the minimum required for good health, and about 18% more calories per person than in the 1960s, despite a significant increase in total population. The Food First Institute points out, "abundance, not scarcity, best describes the supply of food in the world today." Yet, most proposed solutions to world hunger call for new technologies to increase food production.

 

The problem from Angus' perspective is "Scientific research is vitally important to the development of agriculture, but initiatives that assume in advance that new seeds and chemicals are needed are neither credible nor truly scientific. The fact that there is already enough food to feed the world shows that the food crisis is not a technical problem -- it is a social and political problem. Rather than asking how to increase production, our first question should be why, when so much food is available, are over 850 million people hungry and malnourished and 18,000 children die of hunger every day?"


The answer is "The global food industry is not organized to feed the hungry; it is organized to generate profits for corporate agribusiness. This year, agribusiness profits are soaring above last year's levels, while hungry people from Haiti to Egypt to Senegal are taking to the streets to protest rising food prices." These figures are from just the first three months of 2008. Grain Trading: Archer Daniels Midland (ADM) gross profit $1.15 billion, up 55% from 2007; Cargill net earnings $1.03 billion, up 86% and Bunge Consolidated gross profit $867 million, up 189%. Seeds & herbicides: Monsanto gross profit $2.23 billion up 54%, Dupont Agriculture and Nutrition pre-tax operating income $786 million up 21%. Fertilizer: Potash Corporation net income $66 million, up 185.9% and Mosaic net earnings $520.8 million, up more than 1,200%. This is beyond greed, obscene by any humanitarian standards.


Angus cuts to the heart of the food crisis with this observation, "These companies, plus a few more, are the monopoly or near-monopoly buyers and sellers of agricultural products around the world. Six companies control 85% of the world trade in grain; three control 83% of cocoa; three control 80% of the banana trade. ADM, Cargill and Bunge effectively control the world's corn, which means that they alone decide how much of each year's crop goes to make ethanol, sweeteners, animal feed or human food." The editors of Hungry for Profit supports this thesis, "The enormous power exerted by the largest agribusiness/food corporations allows them essentially to control the cost of their raw materials purchased from farmers while at the same time keeping prices of food to the general public at high enough levels to ensure large profits."


Over the past three decades, transnational agribusiness companies have engineered a massive restructuring of global agriculture. Directly through their own market power and indirectly through governments and the World Bank, IMF and World Trade Organization, they have changed the way food is grown and distributed around the world, making food crises a part of the profit motive. Consequently, the world is not experiencing a food crisis rather it has a farm crisis that has been building for decades.


During this period, the rich countries of the north forced poor countries to open their markets, and then flooded those markets with subsidized food, devastating Third World farming. Conversely, southern countries were cajoled and bullied into adopting agricultural policies that promote export crops rather than food for domestic consumption. Large-scale industrial agriculture produces single-crop (monoculture) that demands massive amounts of water and huge quantities of fertilizer and pesticides. Increasingly, traditional farming has been pushed aside for industrial farming for agribusinesses.

 

Angus cites India as a prime example of a country that exports food while millions of people are starving. Over 1/5 of India's population is chronically hungry and 48% of children under age 5 are malnourished. Nevertheless, India exported $1.5 billion worth of milled rice and $322 million worth of wheat in 2004. Colombia's farmland which used to grow food for domestic consumption now grows, produces and exports 62% of all cut flowers sold in the United States, while 13% of the population is malnourished. Kenya was self-sufficient in food until about 25 years ago. Now it imports 80% of its food but exports 80% of its agricultural products. Such cases would be laughable were they not so tragic.

 

Contrary to the claims of agribusiness, the latest agricultural research, including more than a decade of concrete experience in Cuba, proves that small and mid-sized farms using sustainable agroecological methods are much more productive and vastly less damaging to the environment than huge industrial farms. Industrial farming continues not because it is more productive, but because it has been able, until now, to deliver uniform products in predictable quantities, bred specifically to resist damage during shipment to distant markets. That's where the profit is, and profit is what counts, no matter what the effect may be on earth, air, and water.


Fighting for food sovereignty took a giant step forward when La Via Campesina (Peasant Way) was organized in 1995. An umbrella body that encompasses more than 120 small farmers' and peasants' organizations in 56 countries, ranging from the Landless Rural Workers Movement (MST) in Brazil to the National Farmers Union in Canada, La Via Campesina pursues food sovereignty as an alternative to food security. They argued: what's needed is access to land, water, and resources, and the people affected must have the right to know and to decide about food policies. Food is too important to be left to the global market and the manipulations of agribusiness: world hunger can only be ended by re-establishing small and mid-sized family farms as the key elements of food production.


To read Angus' two-part article, go to http://climateandcapitalism.com/?p=2539 and to get information about Archangel: A Hip Hop Vision of Love and the Battle of Good Versus Evil go to www.Archangelworld.com to get the book.






Mailbox: E-Mails, Faxes and Telephone Calls



Email www.dailymail.co.uk...How mad cow disease 'can be spread through air' By David Derbyshire…Mad cow disease can be spread by airborne particles, researchers warn. And they fear that those who work in abattoirs, slaughterhouses and laboratories could be at risk. Their study shows prions, the infectious agents which cause BSE and its human form, variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease, can be dangerous if carried through the air. In tests, mice who breathed them in developed the brain disease with 'frightening' speed and died. The discovery could also explain why some of the victims in the 1990s were vegetarians. Since the link between BSE-infected meat and vCJD was confirmed in 1996, 170 have died. Deaths peaked in 2000 when 28 died. Last year, there were three victims. Prions, a type of protein, can spread on surgical instruments and in blood transfusions. It had been assumed they were not transmitted by air. But Swiss researcher Dr Adriano Aguzzi at University Hospital Zurich and colleagues exposed laboratory mice to aerosols containing prions in a specially designed chamber. Just one minute's exposure to the prions was enough to infect all the mice, Dr Aguzzi reports in the journal PLoS Pathogens. The longer the exposure lasted, the sooner the mice developed symptoms of vCJD. Prions are found in brain and spinal tissue and doctors believe the victims of vCJD were infected from eating contaminated beef. However, some victims were vegetarians - raising the prospect that they were infected in another way.

 

Email www.dailymail.co.uk...Scientists create GM 'superchicken' that doesn't spread bird flu...By David Derbyshire...A genetically modified 'superchicken' that doesn't spread deadly bird flu has been developed by scientists. The bird is intended to prevent the outbreaks of avian influenza which lead to millions of birds being culled. It could also stop new strains of flu mutating in domestic fowl and spreading to people, leading to killer worldwide pandemics. The British team behind the GM chicken says it is 'inconceivable' that its meat or eggs could be harmful. However, it will need rigorous safety checks before it could go into the food chain, they said. But anti GM campaigners warned that genetic engineering was not the answer to stopping bird flu - and said the public would never accept GM eggs and meat.

 

Email hesco@campaignfoundations.com...Although you mentioned several times in this weeks piece the impact of rising fuel costs on the grocery checkout tape, I saw no mention of peak oil production (which many say we hit a few years ago) on this trend. Nor did I see any examination of the impact of our long supply lines for increasing those costs. I urge that you check out literature on local diets and the 100-mile diet for inspiration for a path forward. Thanks for alerting me to the Vermont resolution. I had not heard of that yet. Thanks again for all you publish.