The DISH

Unbossed and unbought news and information you can use

Vol. 14 No. 48…Dedicated to the Dialogue on Race…November 28, 2011

---

 

Intuit's Vibe

Home, Sweet Home

By John Howard Payne (1791-1852)

 

 

 

Mid pleasures and palaces though we may roam,

Be it ever so humble, there's no place like home;

A charm from the sky seems to hallow us there,

Which, seek through the world, is ne'er met with elsewhere.

Home, home, sweet, sweet home!

There's no place like home,

Oh, there's no place like home!


An exile from home, splendor dazzles in vain;

Oh, give me my lowly thatched cottage again!

The birds singing gayly, that come at my call --

Give me them -- and the peace of mind, dearer than all!

Home, home, sweet, sweet home!

There's no place like home,

Oh, there's no place like home!

 

I gaze on the moon as I tread the drear wild,

And feel that my mother now thinks of her child,

As she looks on that moon from our own cottage door

Thro' the woodbine, whose fragrance shall cheer me no more.

Home, home, sweet, sweet home!

There's no place like home,

Oh, there's no place like home!

 

How sweet 'tis to sit 'neath a fond father's smile,

And the caress of a mother to soothe and beguile!

Let others delight mid new pleasures to roam,

But give me, oh, give me, the pleasures of home.

Home, home, sweet, sweet home!

There's no place like home,

Oh, there's no place like home!


To thee I'll return, overburdened with care;

The heart's dearest solace will smile on me there;

No more from that cottage again will I roam;

Be it ever so humble, there's no place like home.

Home, home, sweet, sweet, home!

There's no place like home,

Oh, there's no place like home!


---



DISHing it Up Hot!

On Being Thankful!

By Dot



Since reading a well-written and documented survey of American history, I have maintained a healthy skepticism regarding the storyline of the first Thanksgiving. I am sure you have seen an elementary school production based on that eventful gathering; it is the fiction about Pilgrims and Indians told to public school children. As it turns out, our children are spared the harsh realities and are not expected to learn any facts beyond that fairy tale.

Truth be told, the Native American has been driven to the brink of extinction by those "friendly" settlers with whom they shared their bounty. Those friendly settlers and the ones that followed stole native American land from sea to shining sea and forced the native Americans on reservations, a saga being played out today in the Middle East between Israelis and Palestinians.

There is something not quite right about celebrating that bit of history. So, my family has developed its own tradition of gathering and giving thanks. We try to gather weekly, as opposed to annually, to share with one another what transpired this week and upcoming events. On a shoestring budget -- no one in my family is a member of the 1%-- we manage to make these gatherings festive occasions.

This year, as part of our usual get together, we completed my granddaughter's Thursday homework assignment, which was part of her Thanksgiving homework packet. The assignment called for each family member to write a sentence to form a "progressive story." My daughter suggested we all say something about which we are thankful.

As it turned out, we were gathered around the dining room table satiated and noisy playing a game of UNO when my daughter remembered the assignment. So, my granddaughter ran to get pencil and paper and wrote the first couple of sentences to get us started.

Each of us wrote something about family, love and home and how thankful we are to have someplace warm to gather and enjoy each other. As such, it was not much of a "progressive" story; there is no telling how my granddaughter's teacher will grade it. But, we were delighted with the message. It said something about us and being thankful.

These are difficult economic times. And, I think each of us, even the very young, realize how fortunate we are. Millions of Americans have lost jobs and their homes or are facing foreclosure. Hunger stalks even more people than food banks and other charitable organizations can assist.

On Thanksgiving, politicians can be seen standing in serving lines helping to feed the hungry. But, Thanksgiving is just one day. Many people do not have enough to eat or a place to sleep on a daily basis. Ironically, some of these same politicians advocate cutting social service programs, including education, and investing in risky endeavors, such as nuclear energy, that could render our home, planet Earth, unfit for human habitation.

This is America. Our children are indoctrinated to believe that in America anything is possible, yet America allows so many to go without the most basic necessities. Our children are the future; their bodies and dreams must be nourished and encouraged to ensure the future is better than today. It is difficult, if not impossible, to dream, be thankful or work on an empty belly. America can and ought to do better.

---




The Need to Debate Nuclear Power

By John Burl Smith



Entering the White House, President Barack Obama talked of a new energy policy with renewable and alternative energy sources as the centerpiece. As a result of such talk and even some action in the private sector efforts to move away from nuclear power and oil have become less expensive and more prevalent. The American Wind Energy Association reports that close to 10,000 megawatts (Mw) of new wind power joined the grid in 2009. This is roughly the equivalent of 1.5 times what an AP1000 nuclear reactor will generate but without the long wait of construction or the radiation risk and waste. According to a report by the nonprofit Environment California, solar panels installed on rooftops across the state are generating one gigawatt of solar power, equaling the power generation capacity of 2 typical coal-fired power plants. Solar and Nuclear Costs Magazine reported that solar electricity has become cheaper than electricity from nuclear plants in North Carolina.

However, Mr. Obama stepped on his message regarding alternative energy sources in February 2010 while trying to court Republican support for his climate and energy policies by announcing a loan guarantee of $8.3 billion to help the Southern Company build twin reactors in Burke County, Georgia. Now that decision has come back to haunt Obama, as a new controversy over nuclear power plants rages among environmentalists in Georgia and South Carolina, as well as across the nation.

The new Plant Vogtle in Georgia and VC Sumner in South Carolina are ground zero as battle lines are drawn framing the debate over nuclear power, but Republicans vying for the 2012 nomination are ducking the issue. Currently, the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is poised to license the Georgia plants following an October 21, 2011 staff report favoring certification that was not made available to the public until November 2. This prompted a petition by Friends of the Earth, the AP1000 Oversight Group and the North Carolina Waste Awareness and Reduction Network (NC WARN) (11-10-11) that would require the NRC to resolve design issues posed by the AP1000 prior to certification.

Issues surrounding certification of the Westinghouse-Toshiba AP1000 are many. Some are standard design flaws but the petition documents 7 un-reviewed safety concerns which have come to light with the ongoing disaster at Japan's Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant where on March 11, 2011 a magnitude 9.0 earthquake and tsunami forced a shutdown of the plant operated by Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO). As a result of that accident, Arnie Gundersen, Chief Engineer with Fairewinds Associates and other nuclear experts see containment of radiation following an accident as the major problem in the US.

Gundersen says, "Westinghouse's assumption of zero probability of reactor and/or spent fuel cooling failure poses a dangerous risk to public health and safety. Fukushima Unit 4 released enormous amounts of radiation when its spent fuel pool cooling system was shut down during the tsunami. This same sequence is possible with the AP1000 - and the lessons learned from the Fukushima disaster must be applied during the design phase but instead, the NRC and Westinghouse-Toshiba are insisting there is a zero percent chance of such an accident occurring. This is a blatant manipulation of safety codes -- the Atomic Energy Act (AEA) and the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) require the Commission to take a hard look at safety issues and others design flaws of the AP1000 -- that impact the ability of the Westinghouse passive design to cool the reactor and spent fuel pools."

For instance, Gundersen identifies further concerns, "The AP1000 containment system is "extraordinarily close to exceeding its peak post accident design pressure. Its containment is designed for 59 pounds of pressure and the accident calculations analysis is for 58.3 pounds of pressure. So the margin is very small or 7/10 pound of pressure between what the containment can withstand and what they believe will be produced after an accident. The AP1000 Oversight Group has already identified the inability of the AP1000 shield building to act as an effective ultimate heat sink and its containment system to prevent releases of radioactivity in the event of an accident. "The NRC said that containments never leak but Fukushima showed us that they do leak. Also, there are extra heat loads that the NRC assumed will not raise the pressure inside the containment to over its design value. Those extra heat loads relate to something called inadvertent criticality which means the reactor turns its self on without any human intervention," Gundersen said.

TEPCO's admission (11-2-11) that melted nuclear fuel inside three of the Fukushima reactors was continuing to emit traces of a radioactive gas that is a byproduct of nuclear fission. "This means the fuel is probably continuing to experience bursts of fission although the reactors have all been shutdown since March 11," officials said. However to the contrary," Westinghouse-Toshiba's analysis assumes that once a nuclear reactor is shutdown after an accident, the reactor stays shutdown. Even though the Fukushima accidents have clearly proven the fallacy of this Westinghouse-Toshiba calculation, their design does not include any upgrade to account for heat from a continuing nuclear fission reaction like that which Fukushima is currently experiencing," Gundersen warns.

Even though, the Fukushima accident is rated at Level 7, the highest on the UN's International Nuclear Event Scale, and is considered the world's second most serious nuclear disaster, after Chernobyl, there is scant debate among Republicans over the use of nuclear power as a source of energy vis-à-vis safer sources or what to do with waste, as well as clean up in the event of an accident. Just considering the radiation releases that caused more than 80,000 people to be evacuated for 30 kilometer (20 miles) not to mention the environmental aftermath, every American not only Georgians and South Carolinians should be concerned about the RNC's lax approach to certification.

With power companies pushing for 30 new reactors across the U.S., 14 are AP1000s -- and all of those are slated for sites across the South: Duke Energy's Lee plant near Gaffney, S.C.; Florida Power & Light's Turkey Point plant south of Miami; Georgia Power/Southern Company's Plant Vogtle near Augusta, Ga.; Progress Energy's Shearon Harris plant near Raleigh, N.C. and its Levy County plant in Florida; the SCANA/South Carolina Electric & Gas Summer plant near Jenkinsville, S.C.; and the Tennessee Valley Authority's Bellefonte plant in Hollywood, Ala. --- the prospects for a nuclear accident grows exponentially. The next president will definitely face these decisions. Where he stands on nuclear power and how to deal with waste and accidents are "homeland security" issues that should be debated like "war."

Americans should occupy nuclear power plants to pressure lawmakers to insure that the RNC is rigorous with certification. Moreover, congressional candidates should lead a national debate on nuclear power versus support of alternative energy sources no matter who is president. Plant Vogtle and VC Sumner are lines drawn in the sand; once we cross them, they become another problem we are passing on to our grandchildren to solve. (Sources http://atlantaprogressivenews.com, www.truth-out.org, and www.ens-newswire.com)



---



Venue for an Artist

Thanks for What?

By Robert Scheer



I love Thanksgiving for its illusion of abundance. It brings back early childhood memories of the one day each year during the Depression when the food on my family's table was not the leftover produce that my Uncle Leon could no longer sell at his stall, or the nearly spoiled organ meats that our local butcher offered at a steep discount.


But Thanksgiving day was quite the opposite, and while I obviously can't recall what was served in 1936, the year I was born, the holiday was soon seared into my childhood memory as the day when the good times looked upon us in the form of charity gift baskets from philanthropists of various religious and political orders, much like the needy will be served today in volunteer kitchens across America and just as soon will be forgotten.

It did not take long before I was old enough to realize that the largesse of Thanksgiving was the rare exception, and that "just getting by," as my mother's brave optimism would have it, was the norm. Getting by, thanks to Mom's piecework in the downtown sweatshops and my mechanic father's signing on to one of the New Deal's public jobs programs.

Then came the economic miracle of World War II, dismissed in its day by some Republicans as Franklin Roosevelt's treachery, and my parents and other relatives got their jobs back. The relevance of the wartime jobs to Thanksgiving in our family was that my Uncle Edward, the welder, was rewarded every year at his plant with one enormous turkey or two smaller ones.

The result was what I recall as an annual day of bloating, as if my extended family was frantically storing calories in preparation for a severe economic winter that was certain to return. But for us it didn't return. Not with the good union jobs that abounded in the postwar boom and the opportunities provided by the GI Bill and the spread of affordable college education that made upward mobility a truly plausible American goal.

Every time I need to be reminded of what was done for my generation in the way of generous government-funded programs, I reread the part of Colin Powell's inspiring autobiography where he writes about the educational opportunities and vigorous community support programs that postwar kids in the Bronx were afforded. Powell and I were engineering students in the same class at the City College of New York, though I didn't get to know him until he was famous and I spoke with him as a journalist. But the great opportunities available to us, as compared to what is available to the poor today, is a recognition we share.

I thought back to those buoyantly optimistic times at CCNY, the working-class Harvard as it was justifiably called, last week when students protesting onerous tuition hikes at the University of California got pepper-sprayed for their efforts to keep hope alive. The once excellent and very affordable UC system, like the publicly funded colleges of New York and elsewhere across the country, was the proud boast of moderate Republican and Democratic politicians who believed as did the nation's Founders that equal opportunity leading to a land of stakeholders was the essential bedrock of America's experiment in democracy.

No more. On this Thanksgiving we have been cheated of the bounty of that harvest as the stakes have been pulled up on 50 million Americans who have lost or soon will lose their homes. The housing crisis haunts a majority of Americans, even those who own their homes outright but have lost their jobs and must now sell in a downward-swirling housing market.


Good public education on every level, from preschool through college, is now a matter of inherited privilege reserved for those who can pick and choose affluent neighborhood settings for their children's schools. And the prospect of affording one of those settings is dim for most parents in a country where securing a good job is beyond the reach of so many highly motivated people.

How many folks from my generation are honestly sanguine about the economic future of their children and grandchildren? What I have heard constantly, and just this week from a former top investment banker addressing a college class I teach, is that our offspring probably will face a decade of lost opportunity. I thought back to my college days and how shocked any of us, even those from the most impoverished of circumstances, would have been to hear such a prediction.

As The New York Times editorialized this Thanksgiving, "One in three Americans - 100 million people - is either poor or perilously close to it."

A bummer of a message, I know, until I think of those pepper-sprayed college students linking arms, and of all the Americans, young, old and between, who have occupied their minds with a challenge - that it doesn't have to be this way. For their brave spirit of resistance we should be most grateful this Thanksgiving.

About Me: Scheer is editor in chief of Truthdig. Over 30 years as a journalist, his columns have appeared in newspapers across the country, and his in-depth interviews have made headlines. His columns can be read at www.truthdig.com.



---



Hood Notes

US Census Figures Show Jump in Child Poverty

By Fred Mazelis

 

 

Figures released by the US Census Bureau indicate an official child poverty rate of 21.6 percent, the highest since the specific surveys of child poverty began in 2001. The report comes from the American Community Survey, a nationwide study that includes an annual sample size of about 3 million addresses across the United States, including every county in every state as well as Puerto Rico, where it is called the Puerto Rico Community Survey.

The highlights of the latest survey, for the year 2010, show that 15.75 million children lived in poverty and that more than 1.1 million children had been added to the total between 2009 and 2010.

Black children, as has been the case historically, had the highest poverty rate, at 38.2 percent. Poverty among Hispanic children was 32.3 percent.

The number and percentage of children in poverty increased in 27 of the 50 states during this period, and no state saw the number or percent of children in poverty decrease. Ten states had child poverty rates of 25 percent or higher, with the highest rates reported in Mississippi (32.5 percent), the District of Columbia (30.4 percent) and New Mexico (30.0 percent).

The child poverty rate has trended upward in the past 10 years. After falling slightly in the years 2006-2008, it has shot up following the 2008 financial collapse, rising 1.8 percentage points between 2008 and 2009 and then another 1.6 in the following year. It is now more than 20 percent for the first time since the surveys began.

About one out of every three children in poverty lived in the four most populous states of the country--California, Texas, Florida and New York. In these states, hard hit by the financial crash and the ongoing deindustrialization, a total of 5.6 million children are in this category. As the official survey admits, "Children who live in poverty, especially young children, are more likely than their peers to have cognitive and behavioral difficulties, to complete fewer years of education, and, as they grow up, to experience more years of unemployment."

The official poverty rate among children is, according to the Census, determined by comparing annual income to a set of threshold dollar values that vary by family size, number of children and age of householder. If the given family's income is less than that threshold value, the individuals in it are considered below the poverty level. The thresholds are based on a cost of living that is calculated using the Consumer Price Index, which is very widely considered to understate the actual expenses for families, including housing, health care and other needs. Food costs, which have historically been stable and in some cases trailed the overall rate of inflation, have jumped drastically for many necessities in the last several years.

The latest ACS survey of child poverty follows other recent data released by the Census Bureau, including a revised measure showing a 16.1 percent national poverty rate, compared to a rate of 15.2 percent. The Census reported 49.1 million in poverty, but also acknowledged that nearly double that figure, 98 million, or almost one third of the US population, is either poor or just above the poverty level.

During the Great Depression of the 1930s, President Franklin Roosevelt, seeking to save the capitalist system, declared in his second inaugural address, in January 1937, "I see one-third of a nation ill-housed, ill-clothed and ill-nourished." This famous phrase, associated with the heyday of American liberalism, was delivered literally in the midst of the famous Flint sit-down strike, in the midst of a period of mass struggles and union organization.

Today, as the census figures attest, it would be no exaggeration to say that nearly one third of the nation struggles with many of the same issues as those of 75 years ago. But the current Democratic occupant of the White House, presiding over crisis-ridden and declining American capitalism, is completely silent on fighting poverty. Instead, the White House and congressional Democrats are engaged in behind-the-scenes negotiations with the Republican leadership to decide how many additional cuts will be made in programs like food stamps, unemployment benefits, Medicare, Medicaid and other life-and-death necessities for the working class, retirees and the poor.

The current stalemate on the so-called supercommittee of Congress revolves around how much to cut from these programs. Not a single voice has been raised among the big business politicians for a genuine war on poverty and homelessness. Instead, they argue over whether the savage cuts are to be "balanced" by some token tax increases on the wealthy. This shows in the clearest possible fashion that the task of fighting poverty can only be taken forward through the independent political struggle of the working class, in a bitter fight against the Democratic Party and all of the institutions of big business. (Source: http://www.wsws.org/articles/2011/nov2011/pove-n22.shtml)


---



News You Use

Foreclosed Homeowners Re-Occupy Their Homes

By Zaineb Mohammed



San Francisco - Carolyn Gage was evicted from her foreclosed home in January. Earlier this month, she moved back in. "I've been in here for 50 years. I know no other place but here. I left and it was just time for me to come back home," said Gage, who is in her mid-50s.

Gage's monthly payments spiked after her adjustable rate mortgage kicked in, and she could no longer afford the payments on her three-bedroom house in the city's Bayview Hunters Point district. She says she tried to modify her loan with her lender, Florida-based IB Properties, but to no avail.

When Gage initially left about 10 months ago, she took some personal items with her, but left most of the furniture and continued paying for some utilities. "It didn't feel right for me to move. I just left my things because I knew I was going to return to them eventually," she said. She had to re-activate a few utilities when she returned, like the water, but found the process fairly easy.

Walking back into the house was an emotional moment for Gage, but a joyous one. "I was like Dorothy in the Wizard of Oz; there's no place like home," Gage said. "It's a family home; I plan to stay there."

Gage was one of about two dozen homeowners who gathered Tuesday for a community potluck on Quesada Avenue for residents facing foreclosure and are refusing to leave their homes.

Homeowners expressed outrage at the way predatory lenders have targeted their community.

Residents of the Bayview are starting to see how the African-American community was especially victimized in the foreclosure crisis.

Gage believes that single women and elders in the black community were targeted for predatory loans. At the peak of the housing boom she was solicited for an adjustable rate loan to do some home improvements, even though she told the loan agent that she was on disability and did not have a steady income.

According to a report released last week by the Center for Responsible Lending, African Americans and Latinos were consistently more likely than whites to receive high-risk loan products. About a quarter of all Latino and African-American borrowers have lost their homes to foreclosure or are seriously delinquent, compared to under 12 percent for white borrowers.

Bayview residents Reverend Archbishop Franz King and Reverend Mother Marina King, who are founders of the St. John Coltrane African Orthodox Church, are also facing foreclosure. Their eviction date is set for Dec. 22.

King expressed deep anger and sorrow at the situation facing the black community in the Bayview. "First redevelopment moved us out of the Fillmore and now we're losing our properties too? It's like there's nowhere for us to go," he said.

Grace Martinez, an organizer with Alliance of Californians for Community Empowerment (ACCE) who helped to arrange the event, commented that banks have become increasingly hostile to their efforts. "They call the police on us; they laugh at us."

Vivian Richardson, a homeowner on Quesada Avenue whose house was also foreclosed on, also has no intention of leaving. Her current eviction date is set for Dec. 31, but she, like many of her neighbors, is asking her lender to reduce the principal on her loan in order to make the monthly payments more affordable.

Richardson has been attempting to modify her home loan for the past two years. Earlier this month, tired of the lack of communication from the lender, Aurora Loan Services based in Delaware, she worked with ACCE to coordinate an e-mail blast to Aurora's chairman.

On Nov. 3, over the span of one to two hours, approximately 1,400 emails were sent and more than 100 phone calls made, imploring Chairman Theodore P. Janulis to stop Richardson's eviction. A spokesperson from the bank called her an hour after the blast and asked her to send an updated set of financial information so that they could review her case.

Two weeks have passed and she has yet to hear anything further. The bank spokesperson commented that Richardson's case is still being reviewed internally and they hope to get back to her by the end of next week.

However, Richardson has lived in her house for 13 years and plans to stay regardless of the bank's decision. "I will defend the home," she said.

On Dec. 6, there will be a national day of action, "Occupy Our Homes," where people across the country facing predicaments similar to Gage and Richardson may follow their lead.

Partly inspired by the Occupy movement, the day of action is supported by various community organizations like Take Back the Land and ACCE. The call to action is for people to move back into their foreclosed properties and to defend the properties of families facing eviction.

Martinez commented on the growing anger people are feeling. "The idea is, 'I want what's mine.'" She said many homeowners had trusted the banks and ultimately, "People were buying into a lie."


---



Disgruntled feels: Coordinated! Mainstream media, which are controlled by the 1%, would have us believe the crackdown on Occupy Wall Street that occurred on the same day in major cities across the country was not a coordinated event. No one with half a brain believes that propaganda. The National Lawyers Guild Mass Defense Committee and the Partnership for Civil Justice have filed requests under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) asking the Departments of Justice and Homeland Security, the FBI, the CIA and the National Parks Service to release "all their information on the planning of the coordinated law enforcement crackdown on Occupy protest encampments in multiple cities over the course of recent days and weeks." Their request specifically seeks documents or information that pertains to federal coordination of the crackdown and the police response. I would be surprised if that information is forthcoming. The Justice Department under Attorney General Eric Holder has been a disappointment and is, in all likelihood, apt to continue disappointing. However, the absence of written documentation does in no way disprove the attack on Occupy Wall Street was a coordinated event.


Disgruntled wants to know: In an effort to appear more humanitarian and law-abiding than the prospective GOP presidential contender, Mr. Obama claimed the US does not engage in waterboarding, because it is torture. According to Mr. Obama, the US does not engage in torture, which is a violation of the Geneva Convention. Well, we, the US still engages in rendition, the practice of sending captives - enemy combatants - to prisons in countries that engage in torture, and Mr. Obama is well aware that torture is routine in these facilities. Moreover, he apparently has no problem with remotely murdering men, women and children, which is illegal and decidedly inhumane. His drone strikes have killed more innocent people in Afghanistan, Pakistan and Yemen, not to mention Libya and Somalia, than he has pardoned. While the number of remote murders number in the hundreds, President Obama has granted a total of 22 pardons as of November 21, 2011 and one sentence commuted, fewer than any president in the last century. With the stingy number of pardons and the willingness to kill by remote control, one is forced to wonder is there a lack of conscience and an abundance of cowardice occupying the Oval Office?


Disgruntled says: First Lady Michelle Obama and Dr. Jill Biden, wife of Vice President Joe Biden, served as grand marshals at a NASCAR race at the Homestead-Miami Speedway. They were present to promote their Joining Forces project on behalf of military families. A replay of a video shot shows clearly that when Mrs. Obama was introduced the crowd booed. It was embarrassing. Rather than using this as a teachable moment, the White House and NASCAR are busy downplaying the incident. Clearly, Mrs. Obama, whose approval rating is one of the highest of any public figure in the nation, was taken aback by the negative reception. Because we would rather downplay the incident, we will never know what made this huge crowd of good Americans boo the First Lady.





Mailbox: E-Mails, Faxes and Telephone Calls



Email www.platts.com...Progress says reactor lid not fully tightened after outage...The US Nuclear Regulatory Commission will begin a special inspection at Progress Energy's Brunswick-2 unit in North Carolina after the utility said Friday the reactor pressure vessel's lid was not adequately tightened when it restarted earlier this week. The unit shut Wednesday morning after the reactor leaked. An investigation showed the inadequately tightened reactor vessel head was a potentially "significant" safety issue, Progress said in a report filed with the NRC. Workers seeking the source of the leak found that at least 10 of the 64 bolts that secure the reactor vessel head to the pressure vessel were not fully tightened. The company is reviewing what happened and whether any components were damaged.

 

 


Email www.truth-out.org...Hunger in America: By the Numbers...By Travis Waldron and Pat Garofalo...Last year, 17.2 million households in the United States were food insecure, the highest level on record, as the Great Recession continued to wreak havoc on families across the country. Of those 17.2 million households, 3.9 million included children.