The DISH

Unbossed and unbought news and information you can use

Vol. 14 No. 47…Dedicated to the Dialogue on Race…November 21, 2011

 

 

Venue for an Artist

Downsizing

By Jenny Walker

 


How much work will be done

once all the workers are laid off?

Who will fit all the fragments

together to form your "bottom line"?

Who will know how to make

your copier copy and your fax fax,

unstuck sticky projects

and translate "idea" into "project done"?

And who will be there to make you look good?

Who will need assistance

instead of being your assistant?

And who will pay to meet that need?

We have watched cartoon

Cartoon Network

American Idol

and Fox News

while our civil liberties were locked up

our investments gutted

our Social Security shredded….

We are told: "you can't win if you don't play"

But , if we sit and wait for "our number,"

our number will be up…..

Haven't we played long enough?



About Me: A long-time activist (since the '60s, although now less organizationally-related, Walker resides in New York City, where she is a poet, photographer, family doctor and educator. She tries to create art that draws people in so they see/hear what they would otherwise not pay attention to. Send comments to jennywalkr@aol.com.

 




Bit of History

Colonel Morris D. Davis

Born July 31, 1958 in Shelby, North Carolina (NC), Morris Davis graduated from Appalachian State University in Boone, NC with a bachelor of science in criminal justice in 1980. He received his law degree in 1983 from North Carolina Central University School of Law in Durham, NC. After receiving his law degree and admission to the North Carolina State Bar, Morris entered active duty, serving as the staff judge advocate for the 7th Bomb Wing, Dyess Air Force Base in Texas. Davis continued his education, graduating from Squadron Officer School (1985). He received his master of laws in military law with a concentration in government procurement law from the Army Judge Advocate General School in Charlottesville, VA (1992). That same year, Davis earned a master of laws in government procurement law from the National Law Center at George Washington University in Washington, D.C. In 1995, Davis took correspondence courses at the Air Command and Staff College. Davis completed Air War College by seminar in 1999.

Davis' military assignments included the 14th Flying Training Wing, Columbus Air Force Base, Mississippi; and the 4409th Operations Group (Provisional), Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. His Department of Defense assignments began in December of 1983 to May 1985 as chief of military justice, Eastern Space and Missile Center, Patrick Air Force Base in Florida.  Davis served as the area defense counsel at the same facility from May 1985 to January 1988. He served as the circuit trial counsel, eastern circuit, Bolling Air Force Base, D.C. from January 1988 to May 1989. Davis became the appellate government counsel, Bolling Air Force Base, D.C., a position he held from May 1989 to July 1991, prior to attending the LL.M. program at the Army Judge Advocate General School in Charlottesville, VA. Davis was selected as the Outstanding Judge Advocate for Headquarters Air Force in 1990.

From June 1992 to July 1995, Davis was an instructor in the civil law division at the Air Force Judge Advocate General School at Maxwell Air Force Base. His other positions include staff judge advocate, deputy commandant, director of Air Force Legal Information Services, and chief prosecutor of the Office of Military Commissions. As chief prosecutor, his responsibilities included directing the overall prosecution efforts of the US in military commissions, supervising all commission prosecutors and assistant prosecutors and advising the Department of Defense General Counsel on matters relating to military commission prosecution activities.

In October 2007, Colonel Davis resigned from his position as chief prosecutor mere hours after he was informed that controversial General Counsel William Haynes would be his superior. Colonel Davis objected to the use of evidence obtained by torture and the growing political interference in the military commissions. In a statement regarding his resignation, Davis declared, "The guy who said waterboarding is A-okay I was not going to take orders from. I quit." Davis became Head of the Air Force Judiciary. He retired from active duty in October 2008.

Davis was named the head of the Foreign Affairs, Defense and Trade Division of the Congressional Research Service in December 2008. He was fired from the position at the end of 2009, because he wrote a critical opinion piece that was published in the Wall Street Journal. The op-ed criticized a preliminary report from the inter-agency review team President Obama authorized for proposing looser judicial standards when the suspects faced more serious charges.

In August 2010, Colonel Davis became the executive director of the Crimes of War Education Project, a nonprofit organization that seeks to increase understanding of the laws of armed conflict worldwide.

An Air Force judge advocate for 25 years, who retired as a Colonel, Davis' military decorations include the Legion of Merit, six Meritorious Service Medals, the Global War on Terrorism Expeditionary Medal, and Global War on Terrorism Service Medal. He received the Justice Charles E. Whittaker Award from the Lawyers Association of Kansas City. Davis was denied an end-of-tour medal for his two years at Guantanamo because he resigned and later criticized the military commissions.

Since retiring from the military, Davis has often spoken out against US military commissions. (Sources: www.defense.gov/news/jan2006/d20060111davis.pdf, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morris_Davis, www.youtube.com/watch?v=f6ZczqgLkuw, and www.crimesofwar.org/about/staff/)





Intuit's Vibe

Perfecting a More Perfect Union

By Morris Davis


My father was a 100 percent disabled veteran of World War II. He left home a healthy man in the prime of life and returned seriously disabled by a broken back during a training accident. My earliest memories are of him going to the Bowman-Gray Hospital at Wake Forest University for multiple surgeries, spending weeks at home in bed in a full-body plaster cast, his back and leg braces and crutches, and the hand-controls that let him drive without using the gas or brake pedals. Like many of his generation - and like many of the men and women I see now at Walter Reed Army Medical Center - there was never a word of bitterness over what he lost, only pride in his country and a bond with others who served in defense of democracy.


Robert Hutchins, former Dean of the Yale Law School and Chancellor of the University of Chicago, said "The death of democracy is not likely to be an assassination from ambush. It will be a slow extinction from apathy, indifference, and undernourishment."

I believe that living in a democracy is a privilege, not a right, and each citizen has a duty to do his or her part to ensure the privilege isn't lost to future generations. That was a lesson I learned from my father. I joined the Air Force a few months after he died and served for 25 years, in part because of his example.

Volunteers for military service aren't apathetic or indifferent about democracy. They pledge to support and defend the Constitution, and many make the ultimate sacrifice; I saw proof every morning when I drove by the white stone markers aligned in rows at Arlington National Cemetery on my way to work. We owe them a duty to do more than just passively surrender to the challenges we face; we have an obligation to participate in working towards solutions.

It says something when we cast nearly as many votes to select the next American Idol as we do to select the next American president, when more can name the "Plus Eight" that belong to Jon and Kate than the eight members of the Supreme Court remaining when Justice John Paul Stevens (Navy veteran) retires, and when Tiger Woods wrecking his marriage and his SUV is the lead story on the national news. Too many of us are too absorbed with the superficial world of celebrities and the schadenfreude of their calamitous lives.

The most basic duty of citizenship is participation, something Americans do less than citizens of most other countries. Almost all eligible voters in Australia - about 95 percent - cast ballots in national elections; typically a little more than half of eligible voters in the U.S. do the same. That's a sad fact. There is no excuse for being uninformed on issues and there is no excuse for not voting. In my view, you forfeit the right to pontificate if you're too lazy to participate.

I'm involved in the Coffee Party, a group that promotes civil discussion about issues and greater public participation in the political process. I don't believe any political party or any group along the ideological spectrum has a monopoly on good ideas, and I believe we should be able to discuss issues and ideas without hurling insults and threats. We seem to lose sight of the fact that we're all in this together.

We have the power and the ability to prove Hutchins wrong and to advance the ideal the Founding Fathers envisioned - continuing to perfect the union, doing justice, insuring domestic tranquility, providing for the common defense, promoting the general welfare, and passing these privileges along to those that follow - if we just have the will.





Politics Y2K11

Black America and Obama's Foreign Policy

By Bill Fletcher, Jr., and Carl Bloice, and Jamala Rogers


In the face of the deployment of 100 US troops to Uganda and the assassination of unindicted accused Al Qaeda operative and US citizen Anwar al-Awlaki by the Obama Administration, and a clear pattern of increased militarization of US policy toward Africa, there is a serious question to be posed to Black America: where is the outcry?

 

It is no rhetorical flourish to say that the foreign policy of the Obama administration, far from representing a qualitative break with that of the Bush administration, has proven in most spheres to be continuity. This in no way means that the same verbal belligerence is at play. In fact, the policy is more akin to that followed by former President Bill Clinton in that there is more of an effort to collaborate with other imperial allies in our aggression rather than the unilateralism that was very characteristic of President George W. Bush. Nevertheless, what we are not seeing is anything approaching a transformation of relations between the USA and the rest of the world, making the 2009 awarding of the Nobel Peace Prize to President Obama premature at best.

Instead we have seen the escalation of war in Afghanistan to the point that one can correctly describe it as the Afpak War (Afghanistan/Pakistan) with the regular drone attacks taking place in both countries and the increase in terrorist activity within Pakistan itself, a phenomenon that truly represents the chickens coming home to roost for US policy. While we applaud the announced withdrawal of US troops from Iraq, there is continued saber-rattling towards Iran. Of course there was the US/NATO intervention in the Libyan civil war with the hypocritical claim to human rights while at the same time casting a blind eye to atrocities in the close US allies like Bahrain. And in the Western Hemisphere, minute changes in US policy towards Cuba, along with on-going hostility towards Venezuela and de facto (if not de jure) support of the 2009 coup in Honduras that overthrew a democratically elected government. Of course, to this list we must add Haiti and US efforts that were undertaken to block the return of deposed President Aristide, not to mention the abject failure of reconstruction efforts since the massive earthquake.

Well, this is a partial list, but the point here is that there is something very wrong in Obama's foreign policy, yet you would not know that from Black America's response. Foreign policy is not being debated on most African American talk radio programs and very rarely do we hear African American commentators in the mainstream media address the limitations of US foreign policy under Obama. While the Congressional Black Caucus has increasingly criticized the President around domestic policies, particularly the need by the administration to address the economic depression-like conditions of Black America, there is relative silence on foreign policy.

This relative silence appears to be rooted in the same general problem that has afflicted Black America since the election of Obama: a belief that criticism and pressure is somehow destructive and disloyal. One can only conclude this in light of the fact that on most foreign policy matters Black America has shown an historic identification with the struggles for liberation and independence, especially in Asia, Africa and Latin America. African Americans were the most critical demographic segment of the USA when it came to the US invasion of Iraq, for instance, and we regularly criticize and openly oppose interventionist activities by the USA...except when they are carried out by the Obama Administration.

We are not waving our fingers at anyone. Rather we are suggesting that this is a dangerous course of action because it represents a failure to recognize that the Obama administration is not about one individual named Barack Obama. It is an administration overseeing policies, many historically rooted, in the objective of building and sustaining global domination. In other words, this goes way beyond a question of Obama's personal views and beliefs and speaks to the sort of administration that he constructed, including who were named top officials and who were excluded.

By remaining silent in the face of US aggression (and law violations, such as the murder of Awlaki and drone attacks that take the lives of many civilian noncombatants) we are making several mistakes. For one, we are ignoring the precedent that is being set. Kill one US citizen without even an indictment (let alone a trial) and where does it end? Wave our swords at Iran and promote destabilization, and does this result in an all-out war? Send troops to Uganda, and does this become another Vietnam? Cajole military forces in one African country to invade another? None of this benefits Black America--not to mention the rest of the world--in the slightest and under other circumstances many African Americans would be protesting.

Paradoxically, it is probably time for us to rethink Obama's remarks at the Congressional Black Caucus banquet in September. When he said African Americans needed to stop complaining and put on our marching boots, many people became upset and felt insulted. But let's think about this for a moment. Too many of us have been content to complain--sometimes bitterly--in private about what we fail to see from the Obama administration. So, maybe it is time to put on those marching boots, indeed, and march in protest not only against the demonic activities of the Republicans but as well against US aggression carried out by the first African American President of the USA?

If not now, when? If not you (us), who? (Source: http://www.zcommunications.org/black-america-and-obama-s-foreign-policy-by-bill-fletcher-jr)





Hood Notes

US Drones Killing Children in Pakistan

By Pratap Chatterjee


A week ago I joined a group of elders and dozens of other young men who had traveled from Waziristan, in northern Pakistan, to Islamabad to discuss the impact of US drone strikes in their communities.

Among the group was Tariq Aziz, a quiet 16-year-old, who had come after he received a phone call from a lawyer in Islamabad offering him an opportunity to learn basic photography to help document strikes.

We met for a grand dinner in the conference hall of a luxury hotel. And the next day we all met again at an official meeting - a 'Waziristan Grand Jirga'. I filmed Tariq Aziz as he walked in with his friends. Each of them pressed their right palms on the chest of each of the elders who lined up to meet them.

Tariq was proud to be part of this meeting. About 18 months earlier, in April 2010, his cousin Aswar Ullah was killed by a missile fired from a drone as he rode a motorcycle near Norak.  Tariq, like all of us, listened intently to the speakers, who included the politician and former cricketer Imran Khan.  What none of us could have imagined was that 72 hours later, this football-loving teenager would himself be killed by a CIA drone, along with his 12-year-old cousin Waheed Khan.

Tariq and Waheed's death brought the total number of children killed in drone strikes to 175, according to the Bureau's own findings. As part of an ongoing investigation, the Bureau has documented 306 drone strikes that have killed between 2,359 and 2,959 people. Over 85% of them have been launched by the administration of President Barack Obama.

Akbar says that the CIA had every opportunity to meet with Tariq, if they wanted to, when he visited Islamabad. 'If they were terrorists, why weren't they arrested in Islamabad, interrogated, charged or tried?'  Akbar spoke to Noor Kalam, Tariq's uncle, who said he was devastated by the news. 'We are helpless. We cannot do anything against the Americans,' he told the lawyer. 'We would like insaaf - justice.'

Mumtaz Khan, Tariq's father, has flown back from the United Arab Emirates, to mourn the death of his son. He is in discussions with Akbar to bring a lawsuit against the CIA. He will be the 31st family to sign up.

The CIA has secretly agreed changes to how it conducts its drone war in Pakistan after pressure from the military and State Department, according to a report in the Wall Street Journal.

Last month, the Bureau reported the 300th strike of the CIA's seven-year drone campaign, and Bureau reporter Chris Woods suggested in an analysis piece that the pattern of recent strikes suggests the CIA has changed tactics to focus on killing senior militants, or High Value Targets. The Wall Street Journal's report appears to confirm this.

The changes include the State Department having more influence in strike decisions, Pakistani leaders being told about strikes in advance more often, and the CIA holding off from strikes when Pakistani officials are visiting the US, the report says.

'The bar has been raised. Inside CIA, there is a recognition you need to be damn sure it's worth it,' the Journal quotes a senior official saying.

The military and National Security Advisor Tom Donilon are increasingly critical of strikes targeting large groups, as they fear the Pakistani authorities may respond by cutting off vital supply routes into Afghanistan.

Meanwhile, senior State Department officials have been critical of the strikes' impact on diplomacy with Pakistan, when relations are already strained following the raid that killed Osama bin Laden in May.

The White House has instigated an appeals process, giving the State Department more influence in deciding when to strike, although the CIA director still makes the final decision, the Journal claims. There has been no fixed policy towards smaller strikes, or targeted attacks on High Value Targets. (Source: www.alternet.org/story/152987/)




News You Use

Meet the 0.01 Percent: War Profiteers (Excerpts)

By Robert Greenwald


There's the top 1% of wealthy Americans (bankers, oil tycoons, hedge fund managers) and there's the top 0.01% of wealthy Americans: the military contractor CEOs.

If you've been following the War Costs campaign, you already know that these corporations are bad bosses, bad job creators and bad stewards of taxpayer dollars. What you may not know is that the huge amount of money these companies' CEOs make off of war and your tax dollars places them squarely at the top of the gang of corrupt super-rich choking our democracy. These CEOs want you to believe the massive war budget is about security -- it's not. The lobbying they're doing to keep the war budget intact at the expense of the social safety net is purely about their greed.

In many areas, including yearly CEO salary and in dollars spent corrupting Congress, these companies are far greater offenders than even the big banks like JP Morgan Chase or Bank of America.

The top 0.01% of earners makes at least $9.14 million per year, a rarefied strata of income that includes defense company CEOs and Wall Street bank chieftains alike. But a deeper dive demonstrates how defense companies outpace the big banks' knack for enriching themselves at the expense of everyone else.

Military Contractor CEO Pay in 2010: Northrop Grumman CEO Wes Bush $22.84 million; Lockheed Martin CEO Robert Stevens $21.89 million and Boeing CEO James McNerney $19.4 million.

Just to put that in context, consider how these annual payoffs compare to the people we're used to thinking of as poster children for the top 1 percent: Financial Sector CEO Pay in 2010: JP Morgan Chase CEO James Dimon $20.81 million, Wells Fargo CEO James Stumpf $18.97 million, and Bank of America CEO Brian Moynihan $1.94 million.

Considering how they stack up to financial sector heads, war industry CEOs aren't just members of the 1%, they're the super-elite, the one-hundredth of a percent.

Disgusted by the overwhelming corporate influence in Congress? Look no further than the military contractor companies, whose flagship companies spend enough on lobbying to dwarf even financial sector titans.

The war industry gets away with blowing our money on job-killing spending because it can bend Congress to its whim. In the process, the industry is like a vacuum sucking up brain power and engineering resources that could and would establish and grow entirely new wholesome industries. It's no surprise that Americans confront a 9.1% unemployment rate and an underemployment rate flirting with 20 percent this year.

Want to know where all the money went that could be putting people back to work or keeping US manufacturing industries competitive? The war industry CEOs dumped lobbying cash on Congress and diverted all that wealth to their private bank accounts.

Read this article in its entirety at www.dailykos.com/story/2011/10/27/1030632/-Meet-the-001-Percent:-War-Profiteers. Then, check out www.commoncause.org/defensesupercommittee, which shows the grip the war profiteers have on the super committee that is supposed to come up with a deficit reduction plan.



Mailbox: E-Mails, Faxes and Telephone Calls


Email http://www.thinkprogress.org...Defense Contractors Pay Little To No Corporate Income Tax While Earning Billions...By Pat Garofalo...Last week, Citizens for Tax Justice released a report showing that 30 major corporations have paid no income taxes for the last three years, as they made $160 billion. CTJ looked at 280 companies in the Fortune 500, and found that "while the federal corporate tax code ostensibly requires big corporations to pay a 35 percent corporate income tax rate, on average, the 280 corporations in our study paid only about half that amount." In fact, over the last three years, only two industries -- retail and health care -- paid an effective tax rate of 30 percent or more. American defense manufacturers pay an average annual tax rate of 17.5 percent, placing them in a class with some of the nation's least-taxed sectors like information technology, telecommunications, financial services and energy...Boeing came in with the lowest tax rate among defense firms at -1.8 percent. Boeing has been outspoken about its desire to see the corporate tax rate cut, even as it pays nothing in taxes. Prominent Republicans like House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan (R-WI) have joined Boeing's griping about corporate taxes, ignoring that the company doesn't actually pay them.

 

 


Email www.commondreams.org...Bloomberg Personifies What the Occupation Opposes...By Glen Ford...New York's mayor Michael Bloomberg justified clearing the tents and other materials of Occupation from Zuccotti Park, saying the protesters will now "have to occupy the space with the power of their arguments." This is a strange kind of logic from the 12th richest man in America, who occupies City Hall for one reason only - because he has bought the office three times since 2001. Mr. Bloomberg's $20 billion fortune maintains him in the Executive Mansion, not the power of his arguments. Bloomberg was a lifelong Democrat until he found it more convenient to run as a Republican, and then as an independent - thus proving that money, not party, is what counts in New York, as in all American politics. Everything else is a diversion, and a lie. Bloomberg has used the mayor's office to make the city more hospitable to his fellow economic one-percenters from all around the planet. But, in that sense, he is no different than the mayors of other American cities - including most of the Black ones - who collaborate in every rich man's scheme to expel the poor in favor of wealthier populations. They've all got a lot of Bloomberg in them; they are operatives for whoever has the money. When Bloomberg moved to end the 24-7 physical occupation of Zuccotti Park, it was not on the strength of his argument - which was full of lies and wholly unconvincing - but with the raw power of his police force and its monopoly on violence.

 

Email www.oldelmtree.com...The Embers of Their Own Demise...By David Glenn Cox...Good morning and welcome to the dawn of the police state, not the beginning of the police state, but its dawn. If you have been looking for an event which in your mind would signal the dawn of the police state, you need look no further than Zuccotti Park. Individuals protesting income inequity, wars and injustice have for the past eight weeks been sleeping outdoors. They have stayed despite the rain and cold, they have slept on concrete and they have endured privations to peacefully send a message to their government. This fraud of a Democratic government has responded with pepper spray, tear gas, rubber bullets and the truncheon. They have responded the way autocratic dictatorships have always responded. The New York police come in the dark of night, no differently than the Soviet NKVD or the Chinese troops in Tiananmen Square. The police come in the dark of night to hide what they do; they come in the dark of night because they don't want the country, at large, to see what they do. They come in the dark of night because these are shameful things. They have exposed the truth, that our government is a fraud and exposed the big lie, that you are free.

 

Email http://uruknet.com...Prosecutor: "A Pair of Testicles Fell Off the President After Election Day"...By Jason Leopold...Morris Davis speaks bluntly about some of President Barack Obama's policy decisions. "There's a pair of testicles somewhere between the Capital Building and the White House that fell off the president after Election Day [2008]," said Davis, an Air Force colonel who spent two years as the chief prosecutor of Guantanamo military commissions, during an interview at his Washington, DC, office over the summer and in email correspondence over the past several months. "He got his butt kicked. Not just with Guantanamo but with national security in general. I'm sure there are a few areas here and there where there have been 'change,' but to me it seems like a third Bush term when it comes to national security." Davis is "hugely disappointed" that Obama reneged on a campaign promise to reject military commissions for "war on terror" detainees, which human rights advocates and defense attorneys have condemned as unconstitutional.