The DISH

Unbossed and unbought news and information you can use

Vol. 14 No. 41…Dedicated to the Dialogue on Race…October 10, 2011

 

Bit of History

Carrie Barefoot Dickerson (1917-2006)


Born May 24, 1917 in Okmulgee County, Oklahoma, Carrie Barefoot attended the Rocky Hill and Nuyaka Mission schools. She earned her M.S. degree in home economics with an emphasis on nutrition at Oklahoma State University.


On an Oklahoma Farmers' Union-sponsored trip to Washington, DC in 1936, she met C.R. Dickerson, who would become an award-winning dairyman and agriculture teacher. The couple married in 1938 and lived on the Dickerson Farm east of Claremore.

In 1943, Barefoot Dickerson began teaching at the Mennonite Pleasant View community school. She taught in several Rogers and Mayes County schools and served as a home demonstration agent in the Cherokee communities of Muskogee and as a 4-H Club leader.

In 1957, Dickerson resigned as home economics teacher at Claremore High School to open a bakery offering whole-grain organic breads. In 1964, she and her husband founded Aunt Carrie's Nursing Home (later Wood Manor) in Claremore. At the age of 50, Dickerson began studying nursing at St. John's Hospital in Tulsa, Oklahoma to fill a need at the nursing home.

On May 8, 1973, Dickerson read a news article entitled "$450 M N-Plant Planned for Inola." Concerned, Dickerson conducted research on the hazards of atomic reactors. She attended the first public hearing held by the Public Service Company of Oklahoma (PSO) on the proposed Black Fox nuclear power plant

Like most people, Dickerson assumed the government would protect her safety. Outraged to learn the government would allow the construction of a nuclear reactor, even though it knew a meltdown could render an area the size of Pennsylvania uninhabitable, Dickerson became an activist. According to Dickerson, "When I saw my little grandson playing outside on the green, uncontaminated grass, I knew in my heart that I was obligated to do all I could to keep him and future generations safe."  Beyond the fear of a meltdown, residents feared that waste from the nuclear plant would lead to birth defects and other health problems.

Dickerson threw herself -- and most of her worldly goods -- into the effort to stop construction of the Black Fox nuclear power plant. She founded CASE (Citizens' Action for Safe Energy) to teach the public about the dangers posed by nuclear power. To raise money for a legal challenge to the reactor's construction, she sold her nursing home. When those funds were depleted, she mortgaged the family farm. When even more money was needed, she stitched quilts and raffled them off, all the while devoting hundreds of hours to learning all she could about nuclear energy.

On October 6, 1978, 346 protestors were arrested at the proposed Black Fox Nuclear Power Plant site. In 1981, the Oklahoma Corporation Commission, which regulates utilities in the state, held hearings on the high electric rates consumers would have to pay, if the nuclear plant was built. After hearing testimony from Dickerson and others, the Commission declared that Black Fox was no longer economically viable. In February 1982, the Corporation Commission officially announced the Black Fox nuclear plant would not be built.

She wrote "Aunt Carrie's War Against Black Fox Nuclear Power Plant," an inspirational tale of her efforts to protect her community. Dickerson is featured in the book Women of Spirit: Stories of Courage from the Women Who Lived Them by Katherine Martin. The Carrie Dickerson Lifetime Achievement Award, presented by the Oklahoma Sustainability Network, is named in her honor. There is no nuclear plant in the state of Oklahoma, and Carrie Barefoot Dickerson is the biggest reason why. Carrie Barefoot Dickerson died on November 17, 2006. (Sources: www.carriedickersonfoundation.com/lifeAndLegacy.html, www.ecn.cz/PRIVATE/Piano/CARRIE.HTM, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carrie_Barefoot_Dickerson)




Intuit's Vibe

Despite Concerns Children Allowed to Return


Japan has been facing an ongoing nuclear crisis since the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant was severely damaged on March 11 when a 9.0-magnitude earthquake and a subsequent tsunami devastated the country. The disaster disabled the cooling systems of the plant. Radioactive elements that leaked into the sea were later found in water, air and food products in some areas of the country. At least 15,813 people were killed and another 3,971 remain missing. More than 88,000 people continue to live in temporary shelters.


According to a study conducted by the Japan Chernobyl Foundation in cooperation with the Shinshu University Hospital, 10 out of 130 children evacuated from Fukushima Prefecture showed hormonal and other irregularities in their thyroid glands.


Despite the study's findings, as well as the detection of plutonium at six locations in Fukushima Prefecture, including in the village of Iitate which is located about 45 kilometers (28 miles) northwest of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant, the government of Japan has lifted its evacuation advisory in certain areas within a 20 to 30 kilometer (12.4 to 18.6 mile) radius from the crippled Fukushima Daiichi power plant.


A Japanese science ministry official confirmed the plutonium detected was a result of the nuclear crisis at Fukushima. This was the first time the government confirmed the spread of plutonium. However, officials said the amount detected posed no danger to health.


At the end of September, the Japanese trade minister announced the government's decision to allow children and pregnant women to return to certain areas near the Fukushima plant, based on improvements in living conditions. According to Trade Minister Yukio Edano, who oversees economic damages from the worst nuclear disaster in 25 years, "We have taken a sound step towards rebuilding and reconstruction in areas suffering damages from the nuclear disaster. We recognize those who evacuated from this zone are concerned about radiation contamination and infrastructure." He added, the government will help clean these areas.


Local governments and volunteers have worked to reduce radioactivity by removing radioactive top soil. However, residents continue to worry about the long-term health effects of radiation exposure. (Sources: http://in.reuters.com/article/2011/09/30/idINIndia-59638020110930 and http://wireupdate.com/news/japan-thyroid-gland-irregularities-found-in-evacuated-youths-from-fukushima.html)





Hood Notes

Doctors and Nurses Flee Fukushima


According to a survey conducted by an association of Fukushima Prefecture hospitals, hundreds of doctors and nurses have resigned from nearby facilities since the start of the crisis at Tokyo Electric Power Co.'s Fukushima nuclear power plant. As a result of their departures, some hospitals in the prefecture have suspended nighttime emergency care and other services.

There are 139 hospitals in the Fukushima Prefecture. Of those, 127 belong to the association that conducted the survey in late July, which found that 125 full-time doctors had resigned from 24 hospitals in the prefecture, or 12 percent of all doctors at those facilities.

As for nurses, 407 have quit from 42 hospitals in the prefecture, representing 5 percent of the nursing staff.

The highest rate of doctor departures occurred in Minami-Soma. Of the four institutions' total staff of doctors, 13 or 46 percent have resigned from four hospitals in the city. At Minami-Soma City General Hospital, the number of doctors has fallen from 14 to seven, a 50 percent drop. In Iwaki, 31 doctors at five hospitals, or 23 percent, resigned. In Fukushima, 41 doctors at six hospitals, or 9 percent, left their jobs. In Koriyama, 25 doctors or 8 percent at four hospitals quit.

As for nurses in Minami-Soma, which is located within the areas designated as emergency evacuation preparation zones, 44 or 16 percent of the total nursing staff left their jobs at four hospitals. At Minami-Soma City General Hospital, 42 nurses have resigned (including some who quit after the survey). In Iwaki, 113 nurses at seven hospitals, or 8 percent, resigned. In Fukushima, 68 at nine hospitals, or 4 percent, quit. In Koriyama, 54 at six hospitals, or 4 percent, resigned.

The association assumes most of the doctors and nurses who resigned did so due to their desire to leave the area amid concern about radiation exposure. Moreover, the actual number of doctors and nurses who have resigned could be much higher if the hospitals that did not respond to the survey and non-association member hospitals are included.

The association said most of the departing doctors and nurses cited evacuation from the nuclear disaster as their reason. However, doctors who quit the hospital's obstetrics and gynecology department and pediatrics department said they were doing so because their patients had already left the city.

At Yotsukura Byoin, a psychiatric hospital in Iwaki, about 35 kilometers from the Fukushima nuclear power plant, three of the institution's six full-time doctors left the prefecture soon after the nuclear crisis began. Two of the three resigned at the end of March.

One of them said, "I'm concerned about radiation because I've got a small child."

The two doctors have since found new jobs in Nagano Prefecture, where their respective parents live.

In late August, the hospital asked one of the doctors via e-mail to return, saying radiation levels in the city had fallen. The hospital received no reply. (Source: http://www.agoracosmopolitan.com/news/intrnational/2011/10/06/984.html)




Venue for an Artist

4 Generator Failures Hit Us Nuclear Plants (Excerpts)

By Ray Henry


Four generators that power emergency systems at nuclear plants have failed when needed since April, an unusual cluster that has attracted the attention of federal inspectors and could prompt the industry to re-examine its maintenance plans.

None of these failures has threatened the public. But the diesel generators serve the crucial function of supplying electricity to cooling systems that prevent a nuclear plant's hot, radioactive fuel from overheating, melting and potentially releasing radiation into the environment. That worst-case scenario happened this year when the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear plant in Japan lost all backup power for its cooling systems after an earthquake and tsunami.

Three diesel generators failed after tornadoes ripped across Alabama and knocked out electric lines serving the Tennessee Valley Authority's Browns Ferry nuclear plant in April. Two failed because of mechanical problems and one was unavailable because of planned maintenance.

Another generator failed at the North Anna plant in Virginia following an August earthquake. Generators have not worked when needed in at least a dozen other instances since 1997 because of mechanical failures or because they were offline for maintenance, according to an Associated Press review of reports compiled by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

"To me it's not an alarming thing," said Michael Golay, a professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology who studies risk at nuclear plants. "But if this trend were to continue, you'd certainly want to look into it."

At a minimum, the failures have prompted NRC inspectors to increase their scrutiny at plants where the problems happened. Beyond that, industry officials and academics say the incidents could lead the NRC to formally warn nuclear plant operators about the recent failures and prompt utilities to reevaluate what can disable a generator. Some think these experiences may factor into upcoming rules the NRC will issue in response to the crisis in Japan.

A single generator failure is not a calamity. All reactors have at least one backup generator and sometimes more. If the diesel generators fail, nuclear plants can run safety gear off batteries for hours or use steam-driven pumps to keep cooling water flowing.

But the loss of all emergency power -- including the diesels -- is a crisis. That happened on March 11 when an earthquake and tsunami disabled all the diesel generators at the Japanese plant. Three of its six reactors suffered meltdowns. The facility was rocked by explosions and released radiation requiring the evacuation of roughly 100,000 people.

In the U.S., an average of roughly one diesel generator has failed when needed each year since 1997. Government researchers who examined diesel generator failures in the U.S. from 1997 to 2003 calculated the average odds that a diesel generator would fail to work at some point during an eight-hour run were slightly greater than 2 or 3 percent, depending on which database was analyzed. Even at low odds, a generator failure can turn serious when combined with other problems, notably human error.

Failure rates have decreased considering they once hovered above 10 percent in the early days of the nuclear power industry, according to NRC reports.

About Me: Henry works for The Associated Press in Atlanta covering nuclear power, agriculture, food safety and environmental issues. He can be reached at www.twitter.com/rhenryAP. Read the entire article at www.fox28.com/story/15651235/4-generator-failures-hit-us-nuclear-plants.




News You Use

The Case Against Fluoride


Fluoridation is the practice of adding a fluoride compound to the public drinking water supply ostensibly for the purpose of fighting tooth decay. The levels used range from 0.6 to 1.2 milligrams of fluoride ion per liter (or parts per million, ppm). The practice began in the U.S. in 1945 and was endorsed by the U.S. Public Health Service (PHS) in 1950.

Very few countries have adopted this practice to any significant extent. Only eight countries in the world have more than 50% of their populations drinking artificially fluoridated water (Australia, Colombia, Ireland, Israel, Malaysia, New Zealand, Singapore, and the U.S.).

In Europe, only Ireland (with 73% of the population fluoridated), the U.K. (10%) and Spain (10%) fluoridate some of their water supplies. In the U.S., about 70% of the population is drinking fluoridated water - that is approximately 200 million people and about half the number of people drinking artificially fluoridated water worldwide.

Some countries have areas with high natural fluoride levels in the water. These include India, China and parts of Africa. In these countries measures are being taken to remove the fluoride because of the health problems that fluoride can cause.

Recently, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control (CDC) issued a report admitting that 2 in 5 children in America show signs of fluoride poisoning (streaking, spotting or pitting of teeth due to dental fluorosis). The agency concluded that fluoride levels need to be lowered in municipal water supplies, reducing fluoride to 0.7 milligrams per liter (the previous recommended upper limit was 1.2 milligrams per liter).

This ends over five decades of the U.S. government recommending up to 1.2 milligrams of fluoride in every liter of water. But even the new lower levels are still more than enough to cause serious harm to children, and when mothers make infant formula using fluoridated tap water, they inadvertently poison their infants with hundreds of times the level of fluoride that would normally be found in healthy human breast milk.

Dr. Paul Connett and other members of the Fluoride Action Network have compiled a compelling case against fluoridation. Their list of 50 reasons to oppose fluoridation includes the fact that fluoride is the only chemical added to water for the purpose of medical treatment. Yet, it treats no medical ailment and is, therefore, bad medical practice.

Other reasons include the fact that the dosage of fluoride is uncontrolled. Everyone, regardless of age, health or vulnerability, receive fluoride in municipalities that fluoridate the water supply. Fluoride is not an essential nutrient. No disease has ever been linked to a fluoride deficiency. Because fluoride accumulates in the body, there are no benefits, only risks, for infants ingesting this heightened level of fluoride at such an early age.

Despite the fact that fluoride has been added to community water supplies for over 60 years, no health agency monitors fluoride exposure or side effects. No regular measurements are being made of the levels of fluoride in urine, blood, bones, hair, or nails of either the general population or sensitive subparts of the population (e.g., individuals with kidney disease). There has never been a single randomized clinical trial to demonstrate fluoridation's effectiveness or safety.

We know fluoride is a poison that may damage the brain, lower IQ, cause non-IQ neurotoxic effects and reproductive problems. Fluoride damages bone, which may cause hip fractures in the elderly. And, fluoride may cause bone cancer. Yet, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) continues to classify fluoride as an "unapproved new drug."

For more on the case against fluoride, see www.fluoridealert.org/50-reasons.htm#. And, view the video of the fluoridation process in Austin, Texas at

www.youtube.com/watch?v=a5_KmB9_fao&feature=player_embedded#!.




Politics Y2K11

Florida's Pinellas County Rejects Fluoride

By Rick Jervis

 

A decision this week by a Florida county commission to stop adding fluoride to its public drinking water has uncorked a decades-old debate on the benefits and potential risks of fluoride despite widespread scientific support of the practice.

Pinellas County commissioners voted 4-3 Tuesday to cease putting fluoride into their water, making it the largest urban county in Florida to discontinue the practice. The move will halt fluoride-injected water from reaching about 700,000 residents but does not include the city of St. Petersburg and three other cities, says Commissioner Ken Welch, who voted to keep fluoride.

Commissioner Norm Roche voted to end the fluoride treatment, saying it was a "social sort of program" the county should avoid, the St. PetersburgTimes reported

Opponents such as the Fluoride Action Network say the fluoride could harm children and should not be administered by the government. "Fluoride is a toxic substance," said Tea Party activist Tony Caso, the Times reported. "This is all part of an agenda that's being pushed forth by the so-called globalists in our government … to keep the people stupid so they don't realize what's going on."

Fluoride advocates, including the American Dental Association, insist the practice reduces cavities, especially among poorer residents who can't afford dental care.

Welch says a few people at Tuesday's meeting identifying themselves as Tea Party activists "hijacked" the issue, calling the practice a government attempt to "dumb down" residents and likening it to Soviet and Nazi practices. The ban was passed despite testimony of more than a dozen dentists and others advocating the practice, he says. "We're going to pay a price for this for generations to come," Welch says.

Judson Phillips, a founder of the Tea Party Nation, says the issue has not been widely discussed at the national level and he doesn't know the activists who pushed for the ban in Florida. "It's not a hot-button Tea Party issue," he says.

Cities across the USA have been adding fluoride to their water since the 1940s as a way to prevent tooth decay and promote oral health, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. When the count was last taken in 2008, more than 195 million residents, or 72% of the U.S. population then, had access to optimally fluoridated water, according to the CDC.

The CDC named adding fluoride to public water one of the "Ten Great Public Health Achievements" of the 20th century.

Critics say fluoride can harm the enamel on the teeth of young children. More than 200 communities have stopped adding fluoride to water supplies in the past 10 years, according to a count by the Fluoride Action Network. During the same period, however, more than 300 communities began adding fluoride, says Edmond Hewlett, a professor at UCLA's School of Dentistry and an American Dental Association spokesman.

Fluoride "reduces the risk of getting cavities. It's highly available to everyone who drinks that water," Hewlett says. "It benefits everyone." (Source: www.usatoday.com/news/nation/story/2011-10-05/pinellas-county-florida-votes-no-fluoride-in-drinking-water/50673318/1?csp=34news&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+usatoday-NewsTopStories+%28News+-+Top+Stories%29)





Disgruntled feels: Bought! With a narrator sounding and looking like the masked character from the movie V for Vendetta, the group Anonymous posted the following video at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j5xRaQnHGA0&feature=share. As one might expect, the Guy Fawkes or harlequin mask and the mysterious voice of the narrator make for great theater. However, beyond the theatrics, the video contains enough morsels of truth worthy of sharing. Like many of the protestors across the country that have joined the Occupy Wall Street Movement, I believe bankers and the multinational enterprises they finance are a significant part of socioeconomic and political problems plaguing the world. Historically, bankers have financed the most heinous enterprises ever devised by men to the detriment of other men from war and slavery to environmental degradation. And, they have used their ill-gotten gains to shield them from public ire. In the banksters' playbook, everyone and everything is for hire. There is nothing that cannot be brought, including our government, the president, Congress and federal agencies funded with our tax dollars. Drowning in cash, the one-percent can buy police forces to act as private security to protect their personal property. Recently, these thieves bought the New York police department for $4.6 million.

 

 

Disgruntled wants to know: The most recent information from Japan regarding the Fukushima nuclear disaster indicates conditions are improving. In fact, the government has advised the evacuees that it is safe to return to some areas, since the radiation levels are low. Scientists and apparently the doctors and nurses that have chosen to vacate the premises know that even low levels of radiation over time can be harmful to human health. As far as some of us are concerned, there is no "safe" level of radiation. With that said, we, meaning people of the world, have no earthly notion of what is transpiring in Japan in the wake of this disaster. In the West, especially the US, no information is being broadcast to keep us apprized of the situation, as though this ecological disaster does not affect all of us. We must ask the pressing question, what is happening at the TEPCO nuclear power plant in Fukushima?

 

 

 

 


Disgruntled feels: American fall! Recently, President Obama called for members of the Congressional Black Caucus to take off their bedroom slippers and put on their marching shoes. Apparently, folks beyond that black-tie audience heard him and have taken their concerns to the streets of America. Whether or not the Occupy Wall Street protests develop into an American fall - ala the Arab Spring-remains to be seen, but there are plenty of things wrong in this country and the world that people can come together around and demand change. Quite frankly, with gridlock paralyzing Washington as economic conditions deteriorate, I am surprised that Americans have taken so much pain and misery in stride. It must be the fluoride in the drinking water that has made them so docile. Then again, maybe the Wall Street Occupation will metastasize into a full blown revolution - the American fall!

 




Mailbox: E-Mails, Faxes and Telephone Calls



Email www.care2.com...GM Salmon Secretly Filled With Eel DNA? Anyone For Dinner?...By Judy...I demand the right to know what I am eating. Why should that be such a problem? For a decade, Monsanto has been selling genetically engineered corn and soybean seeds to farmers. Some has already made its way into processed food and is sold to consumers without any labeling. Shockingly, according to the Grocery Manufacturers Association, an estimated 80% of processed food sold in the U.S. contains GMO ingredients. Now, genetically modified (GM) crops are poised to move into supermarket produce sections and farmers markets. The first GM fish, AquAdvantage salmon, which has been engineered with eel genes that grow to maturity twice as fast as normal, could soon be at fish counters. "FDA should require labeling to insure that any unexpected or unintended effects of engineering this salmon, the first GE animal to request a New Animal Drug Approval, come to FDA attention," said Dr. Michael Hansen, senior scientist at Consumers Union. "Recently certain drugs approved by FDA as safe have turned out to have unexpected health effects after they were widely used by consumers. It is essential to label a GE animal so that any unexpected effects will be recognized and consumer health protected."

 

 

Email www.federalnewsradio.com...EPA rolls back air rule, Texas gets most leeway...By Ramit Plushnick-Masti...The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is planning to ease new pollution rules that angered several states and infuriated GOP presidential contender Texas Gov. Rick Perry. The proposed fix to the cross-state pollution rule published Thursday will allow nine states, including Texas, to emit more sulfur dioxide. EPA regional administrator Al Armendariz says most of the additional pollution will come from Texas. Armendariz says the change is being made because the EPA now understands it had been provided incorrect information from some utility companies, including Luminant in Texas. He says it's not because of a letter Perry wrote to President Barack Obama or complaints by utility companies that they did not have enough time to comply. States still will have to comply with the revised rules by Jan. 2012.

 

 

 

Email www.khou.com...It's the water you drink, clean in and pay for. It's the water you rely on, because you have to have it. For the past year the KHOU 11 News I-Team has been investigating the quality of the tap water in Texas. What they found was surprising: That many of the state's communities have a real problem with radioactive contamination in their local drinking water. However, the team also discovered that many of those consuming it didn't know they were also being exposed to a health risk. With these latest discoveries, KHOU 11 News is presenting Investigative Reporter Mark Greenblatt's findings in a comprehensive one-hour special. In the program (seen in the five parts below), you'll find out how state scientists found some of Texas' water could pose a 1 in 400 cancer risk. You'll also find out how neighborhoods across the state have been getting illegal amounts of a particularly damaging form of radiation, an exposure that some say was "covered-up" by Texas officials. We'll present how water with under-the-legal-limit amounts of radiation still might not be "safe". You'll read about how concentrated "bursts" of radiation could be released into your home (see note from Dr. Bill Field below) from water pipes that become "a hidden risk" themselves. You'll also hear from the nation's top radiation and health experts, learn the risks and even what to do if your water is contaminated. See the KHOU 11 News I-team ask local and state government officials the questions that you want answered in the video at www.brasschecktv.com/videos/water/radiation-drinking-water-and-deception-15.html.