The DISH

Unbossed and unbought news and information you can use

Vol. 14 No. 33…Dedicated to the Dialogue on Race…August 15, 2011

 

 

Bit of History

John Conyers, Jr.


Born in Detroit, Michigan on May 16, 1929, John Conyers, Jr. graduated from Northwestern High School, where he excelled in music, receiving a letter for playing trumpet in the high school band; he also studied bass, piano, tenor saxophone, and trombone.


His father, a Georgia-born laborer, dropped out of high school and sought work in Detroit at a Chrysler auto plant. On learning that black auto painters made less than their white counterparts, Conyers made a personal protest to company president Walter P. Chrysler. And, while the elder Conyers' labor organizing activities cost him jobs, he rose within the ranks of United Auto Workers' (UAW) union.

 

The 1943 Detroit race riots, in which blacks were pulled off streetcars and attacked by white mobs, began to awaken Conyers' political consciousness, but music and school came first. He breezed through high school, often skipping classes to play pool. He graduated in 1954 with no money for college. He relied on his father's influence to get a job at a Lincoln auto plant. He became the director of his UAW local unit. He took night classes connected with Detroit's Wayne State University and finally enrolled there on a union-backed scholarship in the late 1940s, taking courses in civil engineering.

 

Conyers served in the Michigan National Guard 1948-50; US Army 1950-54; and the US Army Reserves 1954-57. He served for a year in Korea as an officer in the US Army Corps of Engineers and was awarded combat and merit citations.


At the end of his military service, he returned to Michigan where he earned his Bachelor of Arts (1957) and Juris Doctor (1958) degrees at Wayne State University. After passing the bar exam, he co-founded the law firm of Conyers, Bell, and Townsend.


From 1958 to 1961, Conyers worked as an aide to Congressman John Dingell. He was elected to the Congress in 1964, on a platform of "Jobs, Justice, and Peace." Rep. Conyers was re-elected for a 24th term in November of 2010.

 

Over the course of his nearly 50 years in Congress, social justice and economic opportunity have remained focal points of Conyers' congressional career. Some of his major accomplishments include: the Violence Against Women Act of 1994, the Motor Voter Bill of 1993, the Martin Luther King Holiday Act of 1983, the Alcohol Warning Label Act of 1988, and the Jazz Preservation Act of 1987. He was also the driving force behind the Help America Vote Act of 2002. He is one of the founding members of the Congressional Black Caucus, which was formed in 1969.

 

From 1989 to 1994, he served as chair of the House Committee on Government Operations (renamed Committee on Oversight and Government Reform). In 2006, he became the first black to chair the House Committee on the Judiciary in the 110th and 111th Congress.

 

Like many members of Congress, Conyers has had his share of ethical complaints. In late 2006, he "accepted responsibility" for possibly violating House rules after two former aides alleged that Conyers used his staff to work on several local and state campaigns, and forced them to baby-sit and chauffeur his children. The matter was dropped. Conyers was also implicated in the 1992 House banking scandal. Perhaps the worst scandal to touch his career is the bribery conviction of his wife Monica.


A former President pro tempore of the Detroit City Council, Mrs. Conyers pleaded guilty to conspiring to commit bribery in June 2009. On March 10, 2010 she was sentenced to 37 months in prison and two years of supervised probation. She began serving her term on September 10, 2010 at a minimum-security facility in West Virginia.

 

The Conyers have two sons, John III and Carl Edward.


Rep. Conyers is the recipient of many awards for leadership, including the Southern Christian Leadership Conference Award, which was presented to him by Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. He has also been awarded a number of honorary degrees from colleges and universities throughout the nation. (Sources: www.answers.com/topic/john-conyers, www.aaregistry.org, http://en.wikipedia.org, and http://conyers.house.gov)





Politics Y2K11

Protest White House: March on Obama

 

 



At a press conference held by members of the House Out of Poverty Caucus, Rep. John Conyers (D-Mich), criticized the White House regarding the lack of effort to create jobs and the proposed cuts to Social Security that President Obama put on the table during the debt ceiling negotiations. In recognizing that the members of Congress who opposed raising the debt ceiling and called for budget cuts, mainly in critical social programs, were elected by voters from their districts, Rep. Conyers said, "We've got to educate the American people at the same time we educate the President of the United States. The Republicans, Speaker Boehner or Majority Leader Cantor did not call for Social Security cuts in the budget deal. The President of the United States called for that."

 

A member of Congress since 1965, Conyers said, "My response to him is to mass thousands of people in front of the White House to protest this. We want full employment as a matter of government policy, which was passed in 1978 when I stood with Hubert Humphrey. We passed the first bill that allowed the government - in areas of high unemployment - to directly intervene and create jobs. Well, we've got the bill in here again and I've got nothing from the White House."


Conyers also recalled a meeting between labor and civil rights leader A. Philip Randolph and President Franklin D. Roosevelt at which Randolph urged the president to take action against discrimination in the labor market. Roosevelt said, "I agree with you. Now go out and make me do it." While Obama hasn't called on lawmakers to "make him do it," Conyers said, that's exactly what must be done. Otherwise, he added, lawmakers will spend the rest of their lives grumbling about Republican efforts to protect the wealthy instead of actually coming to their constituents' aid. Conyers proclaimed, "We've got to march on him. We want him to know from this day forward that we've had it. We want him to come out on our side and advocate, not to watch and wait to see what [lawmakers] are doing in the House and Senate. We're suffering."

 

Conyers' call for protests on the White House can be seen online at www.youtube.com/watch?v=Op66HTJdf-U.







Hijacking the I-20 Protest

By John Burl Smith



Pressure increased this week on the Atlanta Regional Roundtable Executive Committee as the DeKalb Votes "No" proponents gained momentum in the face of attempts by supporters of the Indian Creek spur to merge it with the demand for an I-20 rail line. This attempted hijacking came on the heels of increased activity in DeKalb County to get the I-20 rail line back on the list of projects to be funded by the one-cent sales tax mandated by the Transportation Investment Act of 2010 (HB 277).


Fearful that history was repeating itself regarding DeKalb residents paying the one-cent Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority (MARTA) sales tax and not getting a train, DISH readers, who felt poorly informed about the legislation, requested a comprehensive review of the bill and updates on the project selection process for HB 277 back in April 2011. Many of these requests came from readers that had been involved in efforts to get an I-20 train over the years.

 

Looking back even further to October of 2010, Southwest DeKalb residents attended a meeting convened by MARTA, DeKalb County government and the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) to plan a lobbying campaign before the Atlanta Regional Roundtable on behalf of an I-20 train. They were told by Dr. John Crocker, MARTA's director of development and regional coordination, "It's up to the community to continue to talk and convince DeKalb and regional officials that the project is something that the community needs. In order to get the I-20 East project on the list we must have certain documentation, such as the locally preferred alternative or a completed environmental impact statement."

 

The I-20 route under discussion at that time ran from downtown Atlanta with stations at major interchanges like Gresham Road, Candler Road, Wesley Chapel Road, Panola Road, Evans Mill Road and ending at the Mall at Stonecrest in Lithonia. There was a general consensus that such a line would serve thousands of South DeKalb, Rockdale and Newton county residents, as well as others that commute daily up I-20 to Atlanta. Economically, it would open up the whole southwest end of DeKalb County which has large tracts of undeveloped land along I-20 and the Lithonia Industrial Park.


Having been dropped from consideration by the Regional Roundtable's Executive Committee (8-4-11), the DeKalb Votes "NO" effort began to take shape last week as disgruntled citizens attended a town hall meeting hosted by Commissioner-at-Large Stan Watson at the Redan Public Library (8-8-11). The two main issues discussed were redistricting and the dropping of the I-20 rail line from the Atlanta Regional Roundtable's constrained list of projects. Expressing outrage at the thought that the I-20 project could go from being number one on the list of transit projects to not even making the list, they were unanimous about voting "NO," if the rail line running out I-20 was not on the list.

 

Boosting the I-20 protest at this meeting was the current President of the DeKalb County Commission, District 3 Commissioner Larry Johnson, who announced that he was holding a press conference the following morning at the Maloof Auditorium in downtown Decatur (8-9-11) to show support for the I-20 proposal. The coalition of I-20 supporters who came to the press conference also traveled to the Loudermilk Center at the ARC in downtown Atlanta to speak before the Atlanta Regional Roundtable's Executive Committee in support of the I-20 train.


However, somewhere between Commissioner Watson's town hall meeting and the media coverage, the I-20 rail line took a detour. Now, the I-20 rail line became a part of the ARC's proposal for a rail line that would run from Indian Creek MARTA station to Wesley Chapel Road and out I-20 to the Mall at Stonecrest. Apparently, the line that began downtown with stops at Gresham and Chandler Road had been hijacked to shoehorn in the Indian Creek proposal, which has not been studied and vetted as the original I-20 project. This is an attempt to hijack the momentum of the protest for the rail line that is favored by most DeKalb supporters, which would run from downtown Atlanta out I-20 to the Mall at Stonecrest.

 

There are three transit projects favored by the Executive Committee: a MARTA line to Emory University, a line from the Arts Center station to Cumberland Mall in Cobb County, and the Indian Creek MARTA station to Wesley Chapel Road. Each of these lines is more costly than a line straight out I-20. Moreover, DeKalb County's representatives on the Executive Committee have engineered a merger of the Indian Creek MARTA station to Wesley Chapel Road line that will cut off the top -- Gresham and Chandler Road - of Southwest DeKalb areas, leaving them out of any new development that will come to DeKalb with any new transit projects, perpetuating their current level of poverty. This is the same old game that has been played on Southwest DeKalb for years; give it to you with one hand while taking it away with the other.

 

South DeKalb County has never gotten a train because its leaders have never stood with us until the end. They have always sold out for campaign contributions. Only this time they are helping to hijack the I-20 protest by turning our attention away from what we want to what they will say is the best we could get. DeKalb residents have paid for a train and they deserve a train or DeKalb Votes "NO!"




News You Use

Protest Anti-American Hiring and Business Practices



"If there is no struggle, there is no progress. Those who profess to favor freedom and yet deprecate agitation are men who want crops without plowing the ground. They want rain without thunder and lightning. They want the ocean without the awful roar of its waters. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and it never will."-- Fredrick Douglass

 

Apple Inc. and other Silicon Valley companies have refused to release EE0-1 data requested under the Freedom of Information Act, calling the information 'trade secrets'. Apple and other companies have argued that the release of employee race and gender data "would cause 'commercial harm' by potentially revealing the company's business strategy to competitors." These companies have convinced federal regulators not to require the release of this data over the 18-month Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) battle launched by Mike Swift, a San Jose Mercury reporter.

 

In 2010, this information was again requested by the Black Economic Council (BEC) and several advocacy groups. To date, no information has been provided.


John Sims, a law professor at the University of the Pacific and an expert in FOIA law, called the objections to release EEO-1 data by Apple, Google and others "absurd."


Northern California has been hard hit by outsourcing, according to a study done by the Brookings Institution, which estimates that between 2004 and 2015, the San Francisco and San Jose metro areas will lose between 3.1% and 4.3% of their jobs to outsourcing. The Sacramento metro area is also estimated to suffer significantly from this problem, losing between 2.1% and 2.5% of its jobs to outsourcing during the same time period.


Occupations considered particularly vulnerable to outsourcing include middle class jobs such as manufacturing positions, office support, financial and technical professions such as data entry and payroll clerks, auditors and tax preparers, computer programmers, software engineers and technical writers. Medical transcribers and paralegals are also viewed as highly vulnerable.


Apple, like Google, has used the excuse that the Bush administration gave them a "wavier" which allowed these companies not to submit EEO data to anyone, including the US Departments of Justice and Labor. These companies, like the banks that were deemed too big to fail, have taken a stand that they are too big and too powerful to comply with federal laws and regulations.

 

Taxpayer dollars are used to fund federal contracts for these Silicon Valley firms and instead of investing in Americans, they invest in non-US tax paying foreign labor.


The destabilization of the American economy, caused by the "Anti-American" hiring and business practices of Apple Inc. under the leadership of CEO Steve Jobs, is inevitable unless we stop the outsourcing of our jobs and manufacturing to other countries.

 

With the goal of increasing employment and contract opportunities for Americans, on August 27th, the Black Economic Council (BEC) will lead a second protest at the Apple Computer Retail Store in Palo Alto, CA. located at 451 University Ave. The protest will begin sharply at 11:45 AM.


For more information, visit www.BlackEconomicCouncil.com or contact Yolanda Lewis at (866) 856-4570 or email lencanty@blackeconomiccouncil.org.





Venue for an Artist

When Is a "Riot" a Revolt? (Excerpts)

By Carl Finamore



Several days of unprecedented revolt by the most impoverished minority populated neighborhoods of London has shaken the normally staid and reserved British aristocracy. Prime Minister David Cameron cut short his Italian vacation in sunny Tuscany to return to the red-orange glare of a burning city. The prime minister was not the only one inconvenienced.

 

In an effort to mobilize 16,000 police officers concentrated in London, England's soccer-addicted fans saw their August 10 match against the Netherlands in Wembley stadium canceled.


So it appears, this week at least, after years of ignoring glaring inequality and injustice, it is safe to say that all of England took notice of the crowded south London neighborhood of Tottenham and to similar minority communities in Birmingham, Manchester, Liverpool and Bristol where an explosive, fiery social consciousness has been rekindled.

 

Tottenham itself, where events first ignited over the police killing of an unarmed black youth, is a genuinely multi-cultural mix of mostly British-born African-Caribbean along with Turkish, Portuguese, Albanian, Kurdish and Somali peoples reportedly speaking 300 different languages.

 

It claims to be the most diverse community in Europe; no doubt most share in common the intense poverty and the abuse and neglect by the rich and powerful that is all too familiar.

 

During this past week, these different languages came together to speak with one voice: look at us; we deserve to be treated fairly.

 

London's current revolt is quite different than the massive protests in other European capitals and even distinguished from those in the Middle East.


The poor of Tottenham, however, do share much with their brethren in black and minority communities of North America. Neither have powerful advocates that are independent of the political establishment.

 

Traditional community and labor organizations in both Britain and the US purporting to represent the working class have utterly failed these communities and allowed both Downing Street and Wall Street to impose their most austere policies on those least represented among us.

 

"Most of all, it once again exposes the trickery and deceit of those who aspire to be our leaders. Not a single black 'leader' has spoken out in defense of the youths. Not one," Hal Austin writes in the August 9 CounterPunch. Austin is a Barbadian, living in London and a leading journalist and social commentator from the black community.

 

Cannot the same be said in America where, for example, prominent national voices mobilizing the oppressed communities to demand jobs are noticeably absent?

 

Of course, the British government peddles a different story about events in Tottenham. Most are echoed by the establishment press.


A typical response came from GlobalPost's London correspondent, Michael Goldfarb, who was quoted on the PBS "NewsHour" web site as derisively dismissing the social problems of Tottenham by commenting that "the tension around [the police killing of the black youth] got out of hand very quickly, but it was clear almost from the beginning that this was plain old looting" by mainly unemployed youth with nothing to do on hot summer nights, he said.


To the extent that this crude and vulgar opinion is shared by many in Britain, it only serves to confirm the truth: Tottenham residents are isolated politically and socially from the rest of British society and particularly from the rest of the working class.

Fundamentally, their isolated existence explains the different form the rebellion took; more akin to a chaotic riot in many people's eyes as opposed to the far-better organized massive upheavals in Madrid, Athens and Cairo that united majority sections of their population and that, thereby, more easily won sympathy and admiration throughout the world.

It is important to recall that these same massive actions ultimately achieved major support from significant and massive social organizations that helped define the powerful and effective character of their protests.


Culpability for the desperate acts in Tottenham is shared by organizations of the working class that have so profoundly failed to embrace these communities and offer them the same shared benefits of organization and same shared status as brothers and sisters.


Their organizational and political inclusion early on, I believe, would have significantly altered and strengthened, how Tottenham residents reacted these last few days.


Attempts during the civil rights movement to politically and socially unite the black community in the US were met with government-inspired assassinations and police terrorism, as documented by revelations contained in the US government's COINTELPRO papers.

 

As a result, beginning in the 1970s, criminal gangs began replacing FBI-targeted militant organizations like Student Non-Violent Coordinating Committee, Congress of Racial Equality, Southern Leadership Conference, Black Panthers, Young Lords, Brown Berets, and numerous other effective social and political organizations in the communities of the oppressed.


This had a debilitating effect after several decades, and results today in reactions to police brutality and poverty being often marked by scattered individual acts of frustration and anger. Protests are sometimes laced with anti-social behavior previously adopted as survival techniques.


For example, while ostensible political targets such as police cars and offices were burned in both Tottenham and Cairo, there was also, in the former case, the indiscriminate burning of buildings and some personal accounts of victimizations that come from pent-up rage.


There were other examples of criminal activity and even conflicts between gangs in the oppressed community of Tottenham that were also reported. Again, these are a result of decades of disorganization in the oppressed communities.


These are not excuses, neither are they defenses. It is an explanation that contains the answer for its resolution: new organizations must be forged that unite the community around common social goals and aspirations.

 

The proliferation of criminal gangs and the utter lack of a coherent, credible and socially class-conscious leadership are but another reflection of political and social separation from the majority of working people.

 

But this reality and the impact it has on distorting the communities' response should not in any way diminish the powerful and profound social nature of the Tottenham revolt, one deserving of our full support.

 

The 1965 Watt's rebellion in Los Angeles was similarly attacked in its day as a criminal enterprise, but history has now properly recorded it as a true revolt against poverty and discrimination. History will also record Tottenham on this honor roll.


The rich and powerful benefit from divisions and rivalries in the oppressed communities in both Britain and in the United States. Arguably, these same forces promote criminalization as a way of preventing the kind of social unity that could become a powerful political force.


A politically cohesive and united Tottenham is the frightening specter that certainly haunts the wealthy elite in Britain, even more than the current very dramatic random acts of outrage.


As for their richer cousins in the US, the wealthy elite here are only too well aware of the smoldering embers of discontent that have been stoked by the same draconian reductions in jobs and social services that have been adopted in Britain.

 

These issues affect the majority of Americans and, hopefully, we learn from Tottenham that a united response is the best response with no community or section of working people left alone to fend for themselves.  (Source: http://www.truth-out.org/when-riot-revolt/1313008260)



About Me: Carl Finamore is Machinist Local 1781 delegate to the San Francisco Labor Council, AFL-CIO. He can be reached local1781@yahoo.com





Hood Notes

Cell Phones Blocked in SF to Hinder Transit Protest

By Paul Elias



SAN FRANCISCO (AP) -- Transit officials said Friday that they blocked cell phone reception in San Francisco train stations for three hours to disrupt planned demonstrations over a police shooting.

 

Officials with the Bay Area Rapid Transit system, better known as BART, said they turned off electricity to cellular towers in four stations from 4 p.m. to 7 p.m. Thursday. The move was made after BART learned that protesters planned to use mobile devices to coordinate a demonstration on train platforms.


"A civil disturbance during commute times at busy downtown San Francisco stations could lead to platform overcrowding and unsafe conditions for BART customers, employees and demonstrators," BART officials said in a prepared statement.

 

The statement noted that it's illegal to demonstrate on the platform or aboard the trains. BART said it has set aside special areas for demonstrations.

 

The American Civil Liberties Union questioned the tactic. "Shutting down access to mobile phones is the wrong response to political protests," the ACLU's Rebecca Farmer said in a blog post.

 

The Electronic Frontier Foundation said on its website that "BART officials are showing themselves to be of a mind with the former president of Egypt, Hosni Mubarak." Mubarak's regime cut Internet and cell phone services in the country for days early this year while trying to squelch protests demanding an end to his authoritarian rule.

 

BART officials were confident the cell phone disruptions were legal. The demonstration planned Thursday failed to develop.


"We had a commute that was safe and without disruption," said BART spokesman Jim Allison.

 

The demonstrators were protesting the July 3 shooting of Charles Blair Hill by BART police who claimed Hill came at them with a knife.

 

A July 11 demonstration disrupted service during the rush-hour commute, prompting the closing of BART's Civic Center station. Several arrests were made. (Source: http://news.yahoo.com/cellphones-blocked-sf-hinder-transit-protest-041114962.html)




Intuit's Vibe

Blacks and Obama (Excerpts)

By Sharon Kyle



Columnist Kevin Alexander Gray of The Progressive asks, "The dilemma of black politics is whether it is about changing the system or running it. Is it about ending the empire and elitism or running the empire and somehow becoming part of the elite? And what will people sacrifice for the latter?"


Answers to these questions take us to the heart of the quandary blacks face when questioning Obama Administration's policies. African-Americans voted overwhelmingly to elect Barack Obama in 2008. His victory was felt by and extended to all African-Americans. Barack Obama's victory gave a different kind of hope to African-Americans, a group that has contributed mightily to America's success, but that has historically gotten the short end of every stick.

 

Perhaps because of this, unlike most progressives, the vast majority of African-Americans are deeply loyal to this President. It's as if he symbolizes the realization of a dream and the return-on-investment of their ancestors. Whether the black community knowingly or deliberately seeks to end an empire or run an empire is not known. But what is apparent is that blacks in America are suffering more than most during this economic crisis but they are the least likely to complain about President Obama's policies.

 

Last week, the NAACP held its 102nd Annual Convention at LA's Convention Center. Issues plaguing black America -- mass incarceration, Great Depression-level unemployment, unparalleled foreclosure rates, lack of affordable health insurance and others -- were discussed by the speakers, but the unwritten taboo against uttering any dissatisfaction with the President or his Administration was in full force.


For legitimate reasons, the black community has continued to rally around President Obama. However, reasons that understandably unite the African-American community in its support of the President -- such as this president's need for more security than any other president in American history; the blatant disrespect shown to him even while addressing the nation at a Joint Session of Congress; the credence given to those who would question his place of birth or demand his school records; and other unprecedented and blatant displays of disrespect -- have solidified the African-American community's support of both Barack Obama and his policies.

 

Today, African-Americans -- arguably the group that is hurting more than any other group except possibly Native Americans -- are reluctant to say anything that might suggest that Obama needs to do a better job. If any other president had enacted the same policies, African-Americans would have been marching in the streets. But black leaders such as Tavis Smiley who have come out and said as much are quickly labeled "Obama Haters".

 

In a piece written for CounterPunch, Vijay Prashad said, "Obama must certainly be defended against attacks to his person. But that defense does not extend to factual and serious criticisms of Obama's policies. The protection of Obama should not mimic the bizarre line of argument that accuses all criticism of Israel as being motivated by anti-Semitism. There is room to both attack racism, and to question Obama's record, just as one must combat anti-Semitism alongside a robust criticism of Israel's record."


The recent debt-ceiling drama is no exception. Even though the "deal" approved by 269 of 435 members of Congress has the potential to cause even more pain in the black community, we aren't hearing their outrage.

 

In a brave and rare move, Congressional Rep. John Conyers (D-Michigan) and Congressional Black Caucus Chair, Rep. Emanuel Cleaver (D-Missouri), have voiced extreme disgust with the bill, with Cleaver referring to the "debt-ceiling" deal as a "sugar-coated Satan Sandwich" and Conyers saying that we need to educate the president.

 

Conyers also said we need to educate the people. He couldn't be more right. We have a political system that is increasingly controlled by the wealthy, with policies enacted that disproportionately benefit them and disadvantage others. The link between race and class was magnified in a report released by the Pew Research Center. The data in the report released last month indicates the wealth gap between whites and blacks is worse today than it was 25 years ago.


Reporting for the Associated Press, Hope Yen recently wrote, "The wealth gaps between whites and minorities have grown to their widest levels in a quarter-century. The recession and uneven recovery have erased decades of minority gains, leaving whites on average with 20 times the net worth of blacks and 18 times that of Hispanics."

 

The Black Congressional Caucus has come out against the debt-ceiling deal with 24 of its 41 voting members voting against it. This is a positive step considering the impact this deal will likely have on the black community.

 

The devastation that would have ensued had this deal not passed is unquestionable. But what is not clear is the path to take going forward. The Tea Party's willingness to hold the country hostage paid off. Now that they've been rewarded, there's no reason to believe they won't use the same tactics again; all the more reason for African-Americans to unite with other progressives.


These cross currents between a desire to support the nation's first African-American president and the need to stand tall for progressive values affected me personally this past weekend, when the Progressive Caucus of the California Democratic Party put forward a resolution that opened the possibility of a primary challenge to President Obama. With a foot in both camps -- as an officer of the Progressive Caucus and a member of the African American Caucus -- I can only hope that steps like this one will push the President and his advisors to reassess their policies and move in more progressive directions. African Americans, in particular, need that course correction.

 

Two developments are worth noting:  During the first week of August, Tavis Smiley and Cornel West are launching what they have dubbed the "Poverty Tour", a 15-city bus tour that will highlight the plight of the poor. The two will be on the road August 6-12, 2011, starting with a gathering of the nation's often forgotten Native Americans on the Lac Coutre Oreilles Indian Reservation near Hayward, Wisconsin.

 

Van Jones, founder of the "Rebuild the Dream" organization and former member of the Obama administration, has joined forces with The Campaign for America's Future to build a coalition committed to countering the Tea Party. Jones, Robert Reich, leaders of the Congressional Progressive Caucus and others will map out a cross-country drive for economic revival.

 

In the coming months, African-Americans will increasingly be forced to make a distinction between defending Obama's policies that have yielded to the Tea Party and supporting Obama the man. The two do not have to go hand-in-hand. Unless action is taken to counter the power wielded by the Tea Party, the country -- and especially the black community -- will be in dire economic straits. (Source: http://www.laprogressive.com/elections/blacks-and-politics/)







Mailbox: E-Mails, Faxes and Telephone Calls



Email www.alternet.org...Graph: US Food Stamp Participation is At An All-Time High...Recently released data from the United States Department of Agriculture's Food and Nutrition Service finds that the U.S. once again reached an all-time high in food stamp recipients in May, with 45.8 million people receiving these benefits. The blog Zero Hedge illustrates this statistic, showing how many more Americans are relying on food stamps than during even the height of the recession



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Email http://talkingpointsmemo.com...Nebraska AG Jon Bruning Compares Welfare Recipients To Scavenging Raccoons...By Benjy Sarlin...Nebraska Attorney General Jon Bruning, a frontrunner to win the GOP nomination against Sen. Ben Nelson (D-NE), compared poor people to scavenging raccoons in describing a requirement that workers at a construction site gather up endangered beetles by luring them into a bucket with a dead rat for release elsewhere. The plan is thwarted when hungry raccoons eat them out of the rat-infested bucket. According to Bruning, "The raccoons figured out the beetles are in the bucket. And its like grapes in a jar. The raccoons - they're not stupid, they're gonna do the easy way if we make it easy for them. Just like welfare recipients all across America. If we don't send them to work, they're gonna take the easy route." See www.youtube.com/watch?v=z7DyDrmviTs 1:08...The incident recalls similar language from Lt. Gov. Andre Bauer (R-SC), who apologized in January 2010 for saying in a speech on America's "culture of dependency" that he learned "as a small child to quit feeding stray animals. You know why? Because they breed."

 

Email http://axisoflogic.com...Israel Cuts Gaza Communication Lines...Israel has damaged communication lines in the Gaza Strip, imposing a complete information blackout on the besieged territory, Palestinian reports say. The communication lock-down occurred late on Tuesday after Israeli bulldozers cut all mobile, land-line and Internet connections with the strip. Based on reports, all efforts to reach residents in the Hamas-run Palestinian region have been unsuccessful. Palestinian telecommunications officials blamed Israeli military bulldozers for damaging fiber optic lines into Gaza, but an Israeli military spokesman has denied any role in the incident. The Palestinian telecom network, PalTel, which needs permits from Israeli authorities to repair the lines, says it has not received them yet. The Israeli regime laid an economic siege on the Gaza Strip in June 2007 after the democratically-elected government of Hamas took over the administration of the strip.

 

Email mulindwa@look.ca..."UK, and other Western countries have encouraged and supported rioters in Third World Countries, whom they label "peaceful demonstrators" even though buildings, vehicles have been torched in addition to loss of lives. It is good for them to have a dose of their medicine. Britain has the capacity to contain the mayhem to a degree, Third World countries have fewer means and capabilities. At the end of the day, the economy will be affected and the FTSE index may dwindle causing a European catastrophic economic crisis"...Eddy Kironde

 

Email www.eurweb.com...This week broadcaster/activist Tavis Smiley and Princeton professor Cornel West, hosts of the syndicated radio show Smiley & West, embarked on a 15-city bus tour to highlight the plight of the poor. From August 6-12, 2011, Smiley & West's Poverty Tour held town hall meetings with America's unemployed, victims of bank foreclosures, senior citizens, students, homeless veterans, educators and young families struggling to survive. They also met with organizers, activists, social entrepreneurs and others who are using creative solutions to address America's biggest challenges: jobs, food, energy, housing, health care and education. Many of the stories gathered from this tour will be heard weekly on the radio program Smiley & West and featured on Tavis Smiley on PBS. Following the tour, the Indiana University School of Public and Environmental Affairs (SPEA) will release a white paper examining the "new poor" in America, and how the face of poverty in America is changing. Recent data suggests that many of the new poor in America are the former middle class. "With all the talk about deficit reduction, somebody has to tell the truth about poverty in America and the impact the outcome of this debate will have on the nation's poor," said Smiley. The Poverty Tour is sponsored in part by the AARP Foundation and the National Education Association (NEA).