The DISH

Unbossed and unbought news and information you can use

Vol. 14 No. 17…Dedicated to the Dialogue on Race…April 25, 2011

 

Venue for an Artist

Poetic Justice

By Robert Johnson

 


Build prisons

not day-care

Lock 'em up

What do we care?

 

Hire cops, not counselors

Staff courts, not clinics

Wage warfare

Not welfare

 

Invest in felons

Ripen 'em like melons

Eat 'em raw, then

Ask for more

 

More poverty

More crime

More men in prison

More fear in the street

More ex-cons among us

Poetic justice



About Me: A professor of justice, law and society at American University in Washington, D.C., Johnson is the author of several social science books dealing with crime and punishment, including Death Work: A Study of the Modern Execution Process, winner of the Outstanding Book Award of the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences. His latest collection of poetry is A Zoo Near You, BleakHouse Publishing, 2010. The above poem is from the collection Poetic Justice: Reflections on the Big House, the Death House & the American Way of Justice published online at www.stopviolence.com/9-11/arts/Poetic_Justice.pdf.  He can be reached at robert.johnson@american.edu.







Bit of History

William Moses Kunstler (1919-1995)



William Moses Kunstler has been called both a "great American hero" and "the most hated lawyer in America" for defending radicals, militants and terrorists. The oldest of three children, Kunstler was born in New York City on July 7, 1919. The son of Frances Mandelbaum and Monroe Bradford Kunstler, a proctologist, William grew up in a middle-class Jewish neighborhood in Central Park West on Manhattan's Upper West Side. He attended Dewitt Clinton High School and then matriculated at Yale University where he graduated with honors in 1941. During WWII, Kunstler served with distinction in the Pacific with the US Army Signal Corps. He attained the rank of major and was awarded a Bronze Star and a Purple Heart.

 

Fighting for right in defense of a just cause continued as part of Kunstler's nature in the study of law at Columbia University. Upon graduation, he opened a modest practice with his brother Michael, Kunstler & Kunstler, in 1946. They practiced family and small business law in the 1950s. He also met and married Lotte Rosenberger and settled into a relatively quiet life in a suburb of New York City. The couple had two daughters, Karin and Jane.

 

While at Yale, Kunstler became an avid poet and throughout his career used poetry in his summations. He wrote several books including the Edgar-award nominated "The Minister and the Choir Singer." He hosted a radio program called "The Law on Trial" on WNEW and gained honorable mention from the National Legal Aid Association's press award in 1957. He also taught classes in trusts and estates at New York University Law School.

 

However, life as an "armchair liberal" ended abruptly for Kunstler, when he became a member of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). He first made headlines defending William Worthy, a correspondent for the Baltimore Afro-American, whose passport was seized by the State Department for traveling to Communist China and Moscow in 1957. Subsequently, he was asked to represent Paul and Orial Redd, the African American founders of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) of New York City, in a housing discrimination lawsuit. Kunstler, who had believed in the principle of equal justice under the law, experienced firsthand how the law actually worked when it came to blacks, minorities and those not favored by society.


Kunstler had enjoyed an ordinary civil practice but now he began his many forays into the dark murky underworld of race relations, civil rights and racial discrimination that tested the code to which he had sworn allegiance. Again at the request of the ACLU, Kunstler rode South to challenge the iron grip of segregation as "Freedom Riders," young activists who rode buses to demand service at bus station restaurants and "white only" restrooms and water fountains, needed an advocate. Standing against Mississippi's racist laws, Kunstler observed "I watched as five scared but determined young people sat down at a lunch counter and were promptly arrested. On that day I learned, all the talking in the world meant nothing; it was the doing, the action that had meaning."


Many of Kunstler's clients were African Americans denied their rights under all kinds of conditions, which made him very unpopular. He would say of his defense in such situations, "For more than 20 years, my representation of Black defendants has been motivated by one of my strongest beliefs: That our society is racist." He refused to defend right-wingers, on the grounds that: "I only defend those whose goals I share. I'm not a lawyer for hire. I only defend those I love."


Representing Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. and others, like Fred Shuttlesworth, who languished in a Birmingham jail, Kunstler played a major role in the legal battles for civil rights. He fought Jim Crow in court as Dr. King desegregated Albany, Georgia, Danville, Virginia, Birmingham, Alabama and St. Augustine, Florida throughout the 1960s. As Dr. King changed his stand on the Vietnam War in the mid-1960s, Kunstler changed to defending black power activists and those opposed to the war.

 

Controversial clients, like H. Rap Brown, leader of the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC), who faced federal anti-riot charges for his powerful speeches, the Chicago Seven for demonstrations at the 1968 Democratic Convention and the Catonsville Nine, Catholic activists who burned draft files to protest the Vietnam War, catapulted Kunstler onto the front pages of newspapers and TV news cast.

 

Kunstler was director of the ACLU from 1964 to 1972 and a member of its National Council. He co-founded the Center for Constitutional Rights in 1966. A changed man by his experiences, Kunstler's personal life fell apart as his first marriage ended. However, his new lifestyle brought into his life Margaret Ratner, a young radical attorney, who he married in 1976. The couple settled in Greenwich Village and had two daughters, Sarah and Emily.


Kunstler continued to cross the line, moving beyond unpopular civil rights clients to representing prisoners, such as John Hill, charged in the riot at Attica prison, Russell Means and Dennis Banks of the American Indian Movement (AIM), who faced charges for Wounded Knee in 1973. Kunstler even joined the defense of Assata Shakur (grandmother of Tupac Shakur) charged in connection with a 1973 shootout with New Jersey State Troopers.

 

By 1986 Kunstler was off the charts as a "radical lawyer" winning cases for clients viewed as indefensible by most. Such cases included Gregory Lee Johnson, who burned an American flag outside the 1984 Republican National Convention; Larry Davis, a 23-year-old drug dealer accused of the attempted murder of six police officers in 1986 and Yusef Salaam, one of five teenagers whose convictions were overturned in the rape and severe beating of a young woman in the1989 Central Park jogger case.

 

These cases made Kunstler more visible and more venerated by blacks, those denied justice, and those who could not afford high-priced lawyers, while being "vilified" in the press and as persona non grata by Jews for defending Muslim clerics in the 1990s. He represented El Sayyid Nosair, an Egyptian immigrant acquitted of the 1990 murder of Rabbi Meir Kahane, the controversial founder of the Jewish Defense League; Sheikh Omar Abdel-Rahman, head of the Egyptian-based Gama'a al-Islamiyah, accused in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing and Qubilah Shabazz, daughter of Malcolm X, accused of plotting to murder Louis Farrakhan of the Nation of Islam.

 

The death of William Moses Kunstler on September 4, 1995 left a void that is yet to be filled. He was tireless in the pursuit of justice without regard to person or position, and he symbolized the guiding principle of American jurisprudence, "innocent until proven guilty." He battled authorities in defense of "justice for all." And with his passing, justice lost a true advocate and the defenseless lost an audacious champion.




Intuit's Vibe

The Terrible Myth

By William Kunstler



"And that's the terrible myth of organized society. That everything that's done through the established system is legal. And that word has a powerful psychological impact. It makes people believe that there is an order to life and an order to a system and that a person that goes through this order and is convicted has gotten all that is due him. And therefore society can turn its conscience off and look to other things and other times.

 

And that's the terrible thing about these past trials is that they have this aura of legitimacy -- this aura of legality. I suspect that better men than the world has known and more of them have gone to their death through a legal system than through all the illegalities in the history of man. Six million people in Europe during the Third Reich? Legal. Sacco/Vanzetti? Quite legal. The Haymarket defendants? Legal. The hundreds of rape trials throughout the South where black men were condemned to death? All legal. Jesus? Legal. Socrates? Legal. And that is the kaleidoscopic nature of what we live through here and in other places. Because all tyrants learn that it is far better to do this thing through some semblance of legality than to do it without that pretense."

 

This excerpt is from "Disturbing the Universe" a documentary about the life of William Kunstler produced by his daughters Emily and Sarah. (Source: www.pbs.org/pov/disturbingtheuniverse/background.php)





Hood Notes

Why I Signed Bill to Abolish Death Penalty

By Pat Quinn



Today (3-9-11), I have signed Senate Bill 3539, which abolishes the death penalty in Illinois.

For me, this was a difficult decision, quite literally the choice between life and death. This was not a decision to be made lightly, or a decision that I came to without deep personal reflection.

 

Since the General Assembly passed this bill, I have met or heard from a wide variety of people on both sides of the issue. I have talked with prosecutors, judges, elected officials, religious leaders from around the world, families of murder victims, people on death row who were exonerated and ordinary citizens who have taken the time to share their thoughts with me. Their experiences, words and opinions have made a tremendous impact on my thinking, and I thank everyone who reached out on this matter.


After their guidance, as well as much thought and reflection, I have concluded that our system of imposing the death penalty is inherently flawed. The evidence presented to me by former prosecutors and judges with decades of experience in the criminal justice system has convinced me that it is impossible to devise a system that is consistent, that is free of discrimination on the basis of race, geography or economic circumstance, and that always gets it right.


As a state, we cannot tolerate the executions of innocent people because such actions strike at the very legitimacy of a government. Since 1977, Illinois has seen 20 people exonerated from death row. Seven of those were exonerated since the moratorium was imposed in 2000. That is a record that should trouble us all.


To say that this is unacceptable does not even begin to express the profound regret and shame we, as a society, must bear for these failures of justice.

 

Since our experience has shown that there is no way to design a perfect death penalty system, free from the numerous flaws that can lead to wrongful convictions or discriminatory treatment, I have concluded that the proper course of action is to abolish it. With our broken system, we cannot ensure justice is achieved in every case. For the same reason, I have also decided to commute the sentences of those currently on death row to natural life imprisonment, without the possibility of parole or release.


I have found no credible evidence that the death penalty has a deterrent effect on the crime of murder and that the enormous sums expended by the state in maintaining a death penalty system would be better spent on preventing crime and assisting victims' families in overcoming their pain and grief.

 

To those who say that we must maintain a death penalty for the sake of the victims' families, I say that it is impossible not to feel the pain of loss that all these families share or to understand the desire for retribution that many may hold. But, as I heard from family members who lost loved ones to murder, maintaining a flawed death penalty system will not bring back their loved ones, will not help them to heal and will not bring closure to their pain. Nothing can do that. We must instead devote our resources toward the prevention of crime and the needs of victims' families, rather than spending more money to preserve a flawed system.

 

The late Cardinal Joseph Bernadin observed, "[i]n a complex, sophisticated democracy like ours, means other than the death penalty are available and can be used to protect society." In our current criminal justice system, we can impose extremely harsh punishments when warranted. Judges can impose sentences of life imprisonment without the possibility of parole. Where necessary and appropriate, the state can incarcerate convicted criminals in maximum security prisons. These means should be sufficient to satisfy our need for retribution, justice and protection.

 

As Governor, I took an oath to uphold our state's Constitution and faithfully execute our laws. Honoring that oath often requires making difficult decisions, but I have found none to be as difficult as the one I made today. I recognize that some may strongly disagree with this decision, but I firmly believe that we are taking an important step forward in our history as Illinois joins the 15 other states and many nations of the world that have abolished the death penalty. (Source: www.illinois.gov/PressReleases/ShowPressRelease.cfm?SubjectID=2&RecNum=9265)





News You Use

Petition to Save Troy Davis



On March 28, 2011, the US Supreme Court refused to hear the death penalty case of Troy Anthony Davis. It was his final appeal.

 

Davis has been on Georgia's death row for close to 20 years. He was convicted of killing off-duty police officer Mark MacPhail. Seven of the nine witnesses called by the prosecution have since recanted their testimony. There were allegations of police coercion and intimidation in obtaining their testimony. Despite the reasonable doubt surrounding his case, Davis could be put to death.


Davis' fate now rests with the Georgia State Board of Pardons and Parole. It could commute his sentence to life without parole. People from around the world support clemency. Noted individuals from Pope Benedict XVI to Archbishop Desmond Tutu have written letters and sought to intervene on Davis' behalf.

 

Davis' sister, Martina Correia, has worked tirelessly to free her brother. She has called for a global mobilization in an effort to save his life and expose to the world the fact that in the US it is not unconstitutional to execute an innocent person. In 1993, the Supreme Court suggested that "actual innocence" is not a sufficient cause to be granted freedom from incarceration as long as the legal rules are followed, even if an innocent people could still be convicted and put to death.

 

The DISH has joined her effort and is urging its readers to sign a petition by Color of Change calling on the Georgia State Board of Pardons and Parole to commute Davis' sentence. At The DISH, we are for life and oppose the death penalty. We believe death by the state is just as heinous as death by an individual. There is reason to believe Davis is innocent, all the more reason to stop the effort to kill him.

 

Please add your voice to the cry for justice and end the possibility of another execution. Write, call or email the Georgia State Board of Pardons and Parole or add your name to the petition by the Color of Change at http://act.colorofchange.org/sign/troy?referring_akid=.950429.FZXcFa&source=facebook.




Public Transit Plan: Taxation Without Representation

By John Burl Smith



The Atlanta Regional Commission (ARC) has submitted (4-15-2011) its "wish list" of transportation projects for the Metro Atlanta region to the planning director of the Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT). This was in response to HB 277 passed by the Georgia legislature this year. This plan calls for regional referendums in 2012 to approve a penny sales tax in those regions to pay for transportation projects. The same ten Metro Atlanta counties that make up the Atlanta Regional Commission -- Cherokee, Clayton, Cobb, DeKalb, Douglas, Fayette, Fulton, Gwinnett, Henry, and Rockdale - also make up a Special Transportation District for HB 277.

 

The plan, in theory, will work this way: In each of ten districts, city and county governments will develop lists of projects for inclusion in the regional plan. Locally, this was the regional "wish lists" submitted by the ARC that went to GDOT. GDOT Planning Director Todd Long will evaluate 437 transportation projects using criteria developed by a so-called Roundtable Committee. He will delete some projects and add some that were not submitted by a local government. Long will then present his "unconstrained" list of projects to the Roundtable by June 1, 2011.

 

The Roundtable will pare down Long's unconstrained list to a final "constrained" list that fits within the $8 billion that is projected to be raised by the penny sales tax. Even though during this time, the working list will be available for public comment, it is not clear how the public's interest will be looked after during all this "horse trading." In October, the Roundtable will send a final "constrained" list that falls within the projected $8 billion in sales tax revenue back to GDOT. Voters will have only a yes or no say on the matter in each region when they vote on the referendum in the summer of 2012.


There are several problems with this bill and the process beyond all the backroom "horse trading" between the Roundtable and GDOT, if you live in DeKalb and Fulton Counties. If one knows the history of the ARC and the results of tax referendums to fund public transportation, DeKalb and Fulton should view this plan with a great deal of skepticism. First, the ARC has never looked out for equality in regards to DeKalb and Fulton Counties' black residents because it was created to circumvent desegregation and undercut black political power when Maynard Jackson was elected Mayor of Atlanta (1973). The ARC was created as an overarching structure to control tax revenue coming to Atlanta and Fulton County from the state of Georgia and the federal government, effectively giving whites veto power over any decision made regarding such revenue. And, its role is no different in deciding which public transportation projects will be funded in this plan.

 

Next, when the Metro Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority (MARTA) was created, the ARC led the opposition in the counties that rejected the one-cent sales tax to fund the public transportation system. Only DeKalb and Fulton Counties voted to pay the one-cent sales tax and have continued to do so since 1971. Adding injury to insult, when the state legislature under former governor Roy Barnes created the Georgia Regional Transportation Authority (GRTA), which was supposed to use MARTA in developing a regional rapid transit network, the surrounding counties were supposed to begin paying the one-cent MARTA sales tax. However, GRTA dropped the requirement that surrounding counties pay the MARTA tax after the state of Georgia gained access to MARTA's dedicated source of revenue (its one-cent tax), which it used to float bonds to finance bus systems in Clayton and Gwinnett Counties, where voters have repeatedly refused to pay the one-cent MARTA sales tax. Tricked again!


This new transportation plan is an "old dog" doing the same old tricks. It is another attempt to get DeKalb and Fulton residents to pay for other counties' public transportation improvements. First, there is no rider in this bill that cancels the MARTA tax or extends it to other counties, equalizing transportation cost between DeKalb and Fulton Counties and the rest of Georgia. While other counties will be voting to add a penny to their sales tax, DeKalb and Fulton will be paying two cents for public transportation.


This scheme is similar to what is happening with Social Security (SS) and Medicare. Even though both are based on payroll taxes, the Tea Party and Republican representatives are portraying them as entitlements paid for by the government, which has helped to create the current deficit and debt, rather than the other way around. If the federal government was not using SS funds as general revenue, the deficit and debt would be even greater. The game here is to relieve the federal government of its obligation to pay back the trillions of dollars owed to SS it used as general revenue, while simultaneously the government will continue to tax certain workers for benefits they will never receive.

 

DeKalb and Fulton County taxpayers were snookered with a similar scheme two years ago in the Grady Hospital privatization. That plan, put forth by the business community, was supposed to rescue Grady from the brink of insolvency. However, it has resulted instead in needy black and poor patients paying more for less service as those wielding the budgetary ax have not come up with promised savings or additional revenue through privatization.


Southwest DeKalb is a classic example of the kind of tax resource drain that will occur under this new public transportation plan. Although this area will pay the penny tax, there is not one project planned for this area, whereas some areas will get several projects. Case in point, originally MARTA was supposed to build a train line to service the Southwest DeKalb I-20 corridor. Even though Southwest DeKalb has paid the one cent sales tax for 40 years, MARTA has built extinctions to serve North DeKalb but not the Southwest. Under its new transportation plans in the "wish list" of projects MARTA proposes an east heavy rail line extension from Indian Creek Station to Wesley Chapel Road, a northeast heavy rail line extension from Doraville Station to Norcross, rail service through the Clifton Corridor and a new line to Turner Field but nothing out I-20 East. A heavy rail line extension straight eastward out I-20 would be the most economical project because there would be no need to purchase land and it would relieve traffic congestion from Rockdale, and Henry Counties, as well as commuters from South Carolina.


This is a "no brainer" DeKalb and Fulton County residents are being victimized again to pay for development and economic improvements in white communities. Areas like Southwest DeKalb are viewed as "cash cows" where tax dollars are siphoned off, leaving homes dilapidated, businesses and schools closed, services cut and middle class neighborhoods become ghettos, withering "like a raisin in the sun." (Source: http://atlantaprogressivenews.com.html)



Disgruntled says: When it comes to crime and justice in the United States of America, skin color and socioeconomic status play deciding roles in how the system metes out rewards and punishment. The rich can and do get away with rape, robbery and murder. Case in point are the robber barons on Wall Street that have raped and robbed countless Americans of pensions, home and hearth while the Justice Department sees nothing wrong. However, if you are poor and/or black, even when it can be legally proven that the system violated its own rules, the criminal justice system finds a way to stack the deck against you. Case in point is the Supreme Court ruling overturning a lower court decision that awarded former death row inmate John Thompson $14 million for a wrongful conviction. Because prosecutors withheld exculpatory evidence, Thompson spent fourteen (14) years on death row. In overturning the lower court decision, the Supreme Court, in a majority opinion written by Justice Clarence Thomas, a black man, basically said the district attorney cannot be held accountable for failing to train his staff. Not only can an innocent person be put to death in this country and it be perfectly legal, now an innocent person can be wrongfully convicted of a crime due to prosecutorial misconduct and have no expectation of receiving an award for damages.


Disgruntled feels: Scammed! With a little over two years in office under his belt, the president is in full campaign mode. His job approval numbers are in the toilet based on the latest polls. If Americans were asked the question - are you better off today than two years ago - I suspect the numbers responding in the negative would be in the high eighties. As a consequence, his approval rating would sink even deeper into negative territory, even among his most faithful base, i.e., black voters. On the economic front, with high unemployment, high home foreclosure rates, and rising food and fuel prices, there is not a lot for poor and middle income Americans to like about Mr. Obama's time in office. Ironically, even with the turmoil in the Middle East and North Africa, there is an oil glut. Yet, gas prices continue to rise. Obviously, consumers are being scammed. With an oil glut, if supply and demand are the two sides of the "invisible hand" that determines price in the "free market," then the reasons prices are soaring are (1) falling value of the dollar (2) speculation and (3) price gouging by big oil companies. Take your pick! Either way, a crime is being perpetrated. It is past time for Mr. Obama to wade in, even if all he can do is jawbone and expose the scam artists!


Disgruntled wants to know: Let's be frank here! The US uses predator drones to remotely kill "insurgents, terrorists and enemy combatants" in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and wherever else it deems necessary to "root out evil." In the process of conducting these targeted assassinations, it has murdered an untold number of innocent men, women and children. It has used so much depleted uranium in Iraq that generations of Iraqis to come will suffer the negative consequences, which include cancer and birth defects. It used white phosphorus to pacify Fallujah, Iraq, a war crime had it been done by any other nation. Its use of these weapons of mass destruction goes unchecked and unpunished by the international community. In addition to wars in Afghanistan, Iraq and unchecked drone attacks in Pakistan, now, the US is at war in Libya. It will be using drones to kill Libyans as part of the pretext to advance its humanitarian mission in that country. We are told that nation's repressive leader is a murderer. But, who is the bigger murderer? Is it the leader of a country that starts a war to save lives and in the process kills thousands or the dictator that puts down a rebellion by killing hundreds?






Mailbox: E-Mails, Faxes and Telephone Calls



Email www.themonitor.com...Ex-South Texas police chief sentenced in drug case ...A former South Texas police chief who pleaded guilty to helping Mexican drug cartels smuggle drugs across the border has been sentenced to 10 years in prison. Hernan Guerra Jr. pleaded guilty in January to one count of conspiracy with intent to distribute. He was sentenced Wednesday. The 45-year-old was arrested last summer at the Sullivan City Police Department. The McAllen Monitor reports that at the sentencing, Guerra told U.S. District Judge Randy Crane that he is sorry for what he has done. Crane said federal investigators had tapped Guerra's phone lines. Crane says that in those recordings, Guerra "seemed to scoff" at the idea of getting arrested.