The DISH

Unbossed and unbought news and information you can use

Vol. 14 No. 16…Dedicated to the Dialogue on Race…April 18, 2011

 

 

Intuit's Vibe

Let America Be America Again

By Langston Hughes (1902-1967)

 

 


Let America be America again.

Let it be the dream it used to be.

Let it be the pioneer on the plain

Seeking a home where he himself is free.

(America never was America to me.)

 

Let America be the dream the dreamers dreamed-

Let it be that great strong land of love

Where never kings connive nor tyrants scheme

That any man be crushed by one above.

(It never was America to me.)

 

O, let my land be a land where Liberty

Is crowned with no false patriotic wreath,

But opportunity is real, and life is free,

Equality is in the air we breathe.

(There's never been equality for me,

Nor freedom in this "homeland of the free.")

 

Say, who are you that mumbles in the dark?

And who are you that draws your veil across the stars?


I am the poor white, fooled and pushed apart,

I am the Negro bearing slavery's scars.

I am the red man driven from the land,

I am the immigrant clutching the hope I seek--

And finding only the same old stupid plan

Of dog eat dog, of mighty crush the weak.

 

I am the young man, full of strength and hope,

Tangled in that ancient endless chain

Of profit, power, gain, of grab the land!

Of grab the gold! Of grab the ways of satisfying need!

Of work the men! Of take the pay!

Of owning everything for one's own greed!

 

I am the farmer, bondsman to the soil.

I am the worker sold to the machine.

I am the Negro, servant to you all.

I am the people, humble, hungry, mean--

Hungry yet today despite the dream.

Beaten yet today--O, Pioneers!

I am the man who never got ahead,

The poorest worker bartered through the years.

 

Yet I'm the one who dreamt our basic dream

In the Old World while still a serf of kings,

Who dreamt a dream so strong, so brave, so true,

That even yet its mighty daring sings

In every brick and stone, in every furrow turned

That's made America the land it has become.

O, I'm the man who sailed those early seas

In search of what I meant to be my home--

For I'm the one who left dark Ireland's shore,

And Poland's plain, and England's grassy lea,

And torn from Black Africa's strand I came

To build a "homeland of the free."

 

The free?

Who said the free? Not me?

Surely not me? The millions on relief today?

The millions shot down when we strike?

The millions who have nothing for our pay?

For all the dreams we've dreamed

And all the songs we've sung

And all the hopes we've held

And all the flags we've hung,

The millions who have nothing for our pay--

Except the dream that's almost dead today.

 

O, let America be America again--

The land that never has been yet--

And yet must be--the land where every man is free.

The land that's mine--the poor man's, Indian's, Negro's, ME--

Who made America,

Whose sweat and blood, whose faith and pain,

Whose hand at the foundry, whose plow in the rain,

Must bring back our mighty dream again.


Sure, call me any ugly name you choose--

The steel of freedom does not stain.

From those who live like leeches on the people's lives,

We must take back our land again,

America!

 

O, yes,

I say it plain,

America never was America to me,

And yet I swear this oath--

America will be!


Out of the rack and ruin of our gangster death,

The rape and rot of graft, and stealth, and lies,

We, the people, must redeem

The land, the mines, the plants, the rivers.

The mountains and the endless plain--

All, all the stretch of these great green states--

And make America again!





A Tale of Two Speeches

By John Burl Smith



U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton spoke at the US-Islamic World Forum (4/12/11) during its gala dinner highlighting efforts "to try and help bridge the difference between the US and Islamic world." Speaking to dignitaries and business leaders from Muslim countries and former American diplomats, the audience included leaders, activists, and experts from different Muslim nations. Secretary Clinton gave what was described as "the most comprehensive and expansive speech yet by the Obama administration on the recent changes in the Middle East."


The goal of the annual meeting, held in Washington for the first time, was to address current issues in US-Muslim relations in light of ongoing Middle East revolutions. Secretary Clinton's speech was laden with descriptive phrases and metaphors intended to give the impression that a "new awakening" in the US foreign policy establishment and a real reevaluation in US diplomacy had arrived, while she maintained US "core values" and "strategic interest" had not changed. For instance she said, "America strongly supports democratization in the region, but rejected a 'one-size fits all' approach." The question is what does 'unconditional support for Israel' means in this "new awakening."

 

Completely overlooking the US role in bankrolling most of the authoritarian regimes in the Middle East and North Africa whose behavior she now condemns, Clinton said "Where the regional balance of power was once measured in tanks and missiles (supplied by the US), Middle Eastern policymakers now have to factor in 'connected, organized and frustrated' citizens who want economic opportunities, political freedoms and an end to corruption. In the 21st century, the material conditions of people's lives have greater impact on national stability and security than ever before."

 

Clinton declared, "The long Arab winter' has begun to thaw. For the first time in decades, there is a real opportunity for lasting change. A real opportunity for people to have their voices heard and their priorities addressed." She continued, "Young Arabs have shown the world that they share universal human aspirations for freedom, dignity and opportunity. But these young people have inherited a region that in many ways is unprepared to meet their growing expectations."

 

Secretary Clinton cited unemployment, poverty, corruption and a lack of women's and minority rights as factors holding back the region. She outlined assistance the US is providing to help transitional democracies in the region, including $150 million for Egypt and $2 billion to encourage private investment across the Middle East and North Africa, particularly for small- and medium-sized businesses.

 

Secretary Clinton's speech to the US-Islamic World Forum is viewed as "a tale of two speeches" by black Americans when comparing her speech to the one given by President Barack Obama at the 20th Annual Convention of the National Action Network (NAN), a black civil rights group based in New York City (4/6/11). Although both recognized some of the same needs and dire conditions facing the people represented by those in the audiences, there were two decidedly different tones and messages delivered. Whereas Secretary Clinton was formal and professionally respectful in her presentation, providing dollar amounts for specific programs the US is undertaking to put its "money where its mouth is," the President left no doubt he had come to simply "high five with the home folks" and not to offer any assistance.


Between clever jokes and name-dropping to church-like applause, Mr. Obama let the NAN faithful know, he felt their pain and clearly understood the desperation from, "A recession that was leaving millions of Americans without a home, without a job, without hope for the future. And I want you to know that so long as there are Americans who cannot find work I will be fighting for jobs, and so long as the gap between the wealthiest few and everybody else keeps on growing I will be fighting for opportunity. That's the last thing I think about when I go to bed at night - the hopes and dreams of people who work hard every single day, look after their families, take care of their responsibilities, and just need a little bit of help to make it.


Now, it's also true, though, the unemployment rate for African Americans is almost double what it is for other groups. It's also true that those with the least have been sacrificing the most during this recession. What's also true is that even before the recession hit, too many communities were marked by structural inequalities in health and education and employment that made it profoundly difficult for too many people to get ahead. I've seen the frustration and the wounded pride in the eyes of folks who've lost their jobs or a father who has to go home and tell his kids that we might not have enough this month, might be losing our apartment this month. I've heard the stories of struggling families who are doing everything right and still at the end of the month don't quite have enough to pay the bills."


Obviously, after such statements and acknowledging such grim realities of life in the African American community, one would expect the President of the United States of America to do as Secretary Clinton by offering help to "bridge the difference" with specific programs and funding to address the myriad problems that he recognizes. Unfortunately however, Mr. Obama did not reveal one dime his administration plans to spend to alleviate problems specific to the black community as he is spending to help people in foreign countries.


The black community could certainly use $150 million of direct aid or $2 billion to encourage private investment in small- and medium-sized businesses. Instead, blacks were served dribble about "nearly 2 million jobs created in the last 13 months but few blacks were among that 2 million. Neither "expansive" nor "comprehensive" in his remarks while patting himself on the back for so-called Wall Street reform to combat predatory lending practices and saving the American auto industry, the President offered no rescue efforts for black people. The absurdity of this tale of two speeches is the fluffy yarns spun about tackling poverty with "Promise Neighborhoods" and expanded "Earned Income Tax Credit," while making sure our civil rights and anti-discrimination laws are enforced. Mr. Obama made no mention of any efforts to address the millions of black men and women in prisons across the US.


A speech filled with dubious claims to say the least, the next time Mr. Obama's handlers send him to talk to black people he should come with more substance and less folksy ghetto-ism. Black voters, what this trip back home was really all about, like everyone else, detest condescending "bullsh**t." Black people have enough comedians getting laughs and being paid for doing so at their expense. They need a president who takes them and their problems seriously. For this lifetime member of NAN, it is truly humiliating when all that black people get from a black president is backslapping and signifying. We got that from white presidents.





Venue for an Artist

The Shifting Zeitgeist of the 'Arab Spring'

By Mark LeVine



The problem is, of course, that the West clearly has little interest in fostering real democratic development across the Arab world (the glaring silence in the face of army violence in Egypt is the most striking confirmation of this fact). And why should it, when for several generations war and authoritarian rule have been at the center of the region's political economy, ensuring steady oil supplies, military alliances, massive arms purchases and cooperative regimes - with adversaries as much as clients each playing their assigned roles.

 

This system has not only generated trillions of dollars in profits for corporations but created a geo-strategic environment that has, remarkably, become more stable as a source of profiteering and military activity the more unstable it has become. The power, and because of that, the danger, of the Arab pro-democracy revolts of the last four months lies precisely in the threat they have posed, not just to local rulers, but to the entire international system in which they are thoroughly enmeshed.

 

It is clear that neither the Western alliance nor powers like Russia and China have any real interest in upsetting this system. But the countries of the developing world, or rather their peoples, do. Led by emerging and recently democratized powers like Brazil, Turkey and Indonesia, this emerging "non-aligned" bloc, whose economic and political fortunes are not tied to the existing military-petroleum complexes of the West, could join with emerging democracies in Africa and Latin America to demand a re-founding of the international system along much more equitable lines.

 

Such a move would have to start with demanding the UN Security Council end the veto power of the five permanent members and a reformulation of the global financial system that has for decades (in fact centuries) worked to ensure an increasing concentration of wealth in the hands of local and global elites as the majority of the earth's people live in near or absolute poverty.


Second, there would have to be a collective opting out of the international debt-for-pseudo development system ruled by the World Bank, IMF, and larger financial industry-led Washington Consensus system by the developing world. A century and a half ago, a debt and finance-dominated global economic system helped destroy both the already weakened Ottoman Empire and the fast-rising Egypt of Muhammad Ali and his successors. Today it has become the most effective tool of controlling restive countries and citizens from the American heartland to the African or Argentinian plains. The momentary solidarity between protesters in Tahrir Square and Madison, Wisconsin points to the common plight of average working people world-wide. The greatest gift bestowed by contemporary globalization would be both a greater awareness of this situation and the means and desire to act collectively against it.

 

The people of the Arab world have begun to do their part. What is necessary now is for citizens in the West to join the fray by taking on their militarized and finance-dominated governments with the same passion as their counterparts from Tunisia to Bahrain have taken on their autocratic systems. It's hard to imagine such a collective awakening in Washington, London or Paris. But four months ago, no one imagined the possibility of such change in Tunis, Cairo, Tripoli or Damascus. History has a funny way of providing opportunities for epochal change when people least expect it. It's up to all of us to ensure that this moment is not wasted, lest Libya rather than Tunisia come to define the Arab awakening of 2011.

 

Finally, using force to aid a violent uprising, while supporting the violent repression of non-violent protests in other countries (most notably Bahrain and other Arabian Peninsula states), sends three very negative messages to protesters around the Arab world: First, that the West only supports democracy when it serves its military interests. Second, violent revolt is more likely to get massive Western support than mass civil protests. Third, there is little incentive to engage in the hard work of developing a broad and coherent strategy of non-violent resistance and non-cooperation-strikes, boycotts and other forms of non-compliance with the government that - while far less spectacular in terms of TV or YouTube imagery - in the long term are crucial to fatally weakening authoritarian regimes. (Source: http://english.aljazeera.net/indepth/opinion/2011/04/20114118540870935.html)



About Me: Mark LeVine is a professor of history at UC Irvine and senior visiting researcher.







Politics Y2K11

Blacks and the Economics of Voting

By Raynard Jackson



How long will the Black community continue to allow the Obama administration and the Democratic Party to insult them and then blame it on Obama not wanting to be perceived as a "Black" president?

 

Let me give an example. You have invested in a business project, Obama Inc. There were 4 classes of investors: class W, which comprised 74% of the total stock; class B, which comprised 13% of the total stock, class H, which comprised 9% of the total stock; and class G, which comprised 4% of the total stock.

 

How would you respond to the CEO of Obama Inc. if he says the rate of return (ROI) payout would be as follows: those who invested in class W stocks would be paid first, followed by, class G, then class L and the last to be paid back would be class B.

 

Well, any sane businessman would expect to be paid by order of the largest to the smallest investor. If you were part of the class W stock (74%), you should be paid first and work your way down to the smallest investor. This is normal and logical in the world of business.

 

Only in politics and with the Black community is this standard not adhered to.


In my above example, the class W stock represents the percentage of white voters from the 2008 presidential election (74% of the total electorate, of which Obama received 43% and McCain received 55%); the class B stock represents the percentage of Black voters from the 2008 presidential election (13% of the total electorate, of which Obama received 95% and McCain received 4%); the class H stock represents the percentage of Hispanic voters from the 2008 presidential election (9% of the total electorate, of which Obama received 67% and McCain received 31%); the class G stock represents the percentage of gay voters from the 2008 presidential election (4% of the total electorate, of which Obama received 70% and McCain received 27%).

 

Despite receiving 95% of the Black vote (who were the second largest shareholders in Obama Inc.), Obama has made a calculated decision to reward the gay and Hispanic communities ahead of the Black community (the smallest and second smallest shareholders in Obama Inc.). In business, the CEO (Obama) and its board of directors (the Democratic National Committee) would be sued for fraud. But Obama knows that Blacks will only complain and do nothing.

 

The gay community stopped giving money to Obama and the Democrats because Obama didn't deliver on any of his campaign promises to them--recognizing gay marriage, repealing "don't ask, don't tell," and giving spousal benefits to gay couples who are federal employees.


The Hispanic community threatened not to vote for Obama or the Democratic Party if they didn't get amnesty for those in the country illegally and passage of the Dream Act.


But, when asked what he would do specifically for the Black community, Obama said nothing--"he is the president of everyone and a rising tide lifts all boats!"


Despite being the second largest shareholder in Obama Inc., the Black community cannot point to a specific program or policy directed towards them and their issues. How do you justify dividend distributions to other shareholders, but not your second largest?


Privately, the supposed Black leaders like Al Sharpton, Marc Morial (Urban League), Ben Jealous (N.A.A.C.P.) all agree with me; but they don't have the guts to speak out publicly because they still want to get invited to the White House and take pictures with Obama.


It took Obama almost 1 ˝ years before he met with the Congressional Black Caucus; and what did they do? They got mad! Obama has yet to meet with any Black businessmen to discuss the disproportionately high unemployment rate within the Black community.


Just like no one fears angering Obama, no one fears angering the Black community. Obama has made a political calculation that there is nothing to lose by ignoring the Black community and everything to gain--including white voters!


Obama believes that if he doesn't do anything specifically for the Black community that somehow people are going to forget that he is Black.

 

The number 1 rule of politics is to reward your friends and punish your enemies. I didn't realize that Blacks were enemies of Obama.





News You Use

Ending the New Jim Crow

 

"Civil disobedience is not our problem. Our problem is that numbers of people all over the world have obeyed the dictates of the leaders of their government and have gone to war, and millions have been killed because of this obedience....Our problem is that people are obedient all over the world in the face of poverty and starvation and stupidity, and war and cruelty. Our problem is that people are obedient while the jails are full of petty thieves, and all the while the grand thieves are running the country. That's our problem." Howard Zinn


Michelle Alexander, author of the New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness, recently addressed an audience at the Pasadena branch of the American Civil Liberties (ACLU). According to Alexander, "More African-American men are in prison or jail, on probation or parole than were enslaved before the Civil War began."

 

A breakdown of the US Justice Department figures reported by ABC News shows that of the 2.3 million inmates in custody, 2.1 million are men and 208,300 are women. Black males represent the largest group (35.4 %) of inmates held in custody, followed by white males (32.9%) and Hispanic males (17.9%). To place the black male incarceration rate in perspective, black men make up less than 10 percent of the US population, but they comprise 35.4 percent of the jail and prison population.

 

According to The Sentencing Project, a criminal justice think tank, the US leads the industrialized world in incarceration. In fact, the U.S. rate of incarceration (762 per 100,000) is five to eight times that of other highly developed countries.

 

In grappling with the dilemma posed by the incarceration rate of black men, Alexander posed the question: If crime rates have fluctuated over the years and are now at historic lows, then why have rates of incarcerated men of color skyrocketed over the past thirty (30) years? She points to the "war on drugs," and the atrocious sentencing system that stemmed from it, which included mandatory minimums, three strikes law and the 100 to 1 sentencing ratio for crack and powder cocaine. Over the past twenty-five (25) years, the war on drugs has focused its discriminating eye primarily on communities of color, despite the fact that multiple studies have shown that Caucasians use and sell illegal drugs at rates equal to or greater than blacks.

 

Ending this new Jim Crow is a must; it will require a revolution in the US criminal justice system. On Saturday, May 21, 2011, Michelle Alexander is scheduled to address the public at a free event at the Riverside Church in Manhattan from 12:30- 4:00 PM. If you are in the area, plan to attend this event and join the revolution to reform the US criminal justice system.





Hood Notes

Mass Incarceration Costly Disaster (Excerpts)

By Linn Washington, Jr.



The U.S. imprisons more people per capita than any country on earth, accounting for 25 percent of the world's prisoners, despite having just five percent of the world's population.

 

America currently holds over two million in prisons with double that number under supervision of parole and probation, according to federal government figures.


Mass incarceration consumes over $50-billion annually across America - money far better spent on creating jobs and improving education.

 

Under federal law persons with drug convictions are permanently barred from receiving financial aid for education, food stamps, welfare and publicly funded housing.

 

But only drug convictions trigger these exclusions under federal law. Violent bank robbers, white-collar criminals like Wall Street scam artists who steal billions, and even murderers who've done their time do not face the post-release deprivations slapped on those with drug convictions on their records, including those imprisoned for simple possession, and not major drug sales.


Exclusions mandated by federal laws compound the legal deprivations of rights found in the laws of most states, such as barring ex-felons from jobs and even stripping ex-felons of their right to vote.


Racism is written all over the economically/socially debilitating practices embedded in mass incarceration. For example, a recent University of Wisconsin study found that 17 percent of white ex-con job seekers received interviews, compared to only five percent of black ex-con job seekers - a race-based disparity that is additionally devastating for people of color.


While politicians pushing punitive policies help drive mass incarceration, its budget- busting persistence implicates the blind-eye of society, according to history professor Dr. Khalil Gibran Muhammad, the new director of the Schomburg Center for Research in Black Culture in New York.

 

"Middle-class whites and blacks in the US are a new kind of 'Silent Majority' regarding mass incarceration," Dr. Muhammad charged. "This 'Silent Majority' supports unjust policies of increased law enforcement and incarceration as the only way to address crime," ignoring proven alternative approaches like "jobs, education and ending societal inequities."

 

Critics of the Obama administration acknowledge that it fulfilled a campaign pledge to address the sentencing disparity between crack and powder cocaine. However, Obama's proclivity for bipartisan consensus resulted in legislation that lowered but did not eliminate the disparity. In addition, that legislation did not apply retroactively, so it failed to mitigate stiff ten-year-plus crack cocaine sentences that left many minorities languishing in federal prisons.

 

In the words of Dr. Cornell West, "Obama and [US Attorney General Eric] Holder have no courage when it comes to the prison-industrial complex." (See entire article at www.thiscantbehappening.net/node/545)




Mailbox: E-Mails, Faxes and Telephone Calls



Email www.dailyprincetonian...News & Notes: West says Obama abandoned Democratic positions...In an interview with Russian television network RT earlier this month, African American studies professor Cornel West GS '80 said that President Barack Obama, whom West publicly supported during his 2008 campaign, is abandoning his political positions. "I think that he has aligned himself with forces that promote the abandonment of poor people and the neglect of working people," West said, according to The Princeton Packet. "I would characterize Obama as a charismatic version of American exceptionalism with a Keynesian neo-liberalism at home and a liberal neoconservatism abroad, which is to say, he is the friendly face of the American empire abroad and internally he is a centrist now leaning to the right." Despite Obama's early adoption of Democratic rhetoric, the president is now "sadly becoming a pawn of big finance and a puppet of big business," West said.