The DISH

Unbossed and unbought news and information you can use

Vol. 13 Issue 4…Dedicated to the Dialogue on Race…January 24, 2010

 

 

Venue for an Artist

Afghanistan

By Dorothy Terry



Was smaller than before

The pebbles washed up on the shore

And all we ever did adore

Turned to wormwood.

We walked along the stonewall,

We did not talk

We knew not when our time would come

But that was yesterday.



Above, the stars had hid from sight.

The longest day returned to Night -

The moon came up with portent's sigh,

The days grew long, the nights flew by,

We hid in grandma's tower room,

Where crows still cawed

Their cries of doom

Explicit nothingness of Hell!



Up there among the wreck and wrack,

We listened for the call

"Give Back," give back the all you'll ever know,

Return the crackling icy flow.

Return the stinging summer heats,

The metronomic heart that beats.

Return the simple, lasting things,

The moon that winks -- the sun that sings…."



You are the lost and weary ones -

The ones who threw away their Guns,

To die in haven's craggy place,

To die ascending rocky face,

To die alone, and scared and cold

To die too soon, before you're Old,

To die tomorrow or today,

In one Portentous giveaway.



About Me: Terry is a little known Chicago poet. This poem and excerpts from her other works can be read online at http://poetrydispatch.wordpress.com.





Bit of History

Greg Mortenson


The son of American missionaries, Irvin "Dempsey" and Jerene Mortenson, Greg was born December 27, 1957 in St. Cloud, Minnesota. Just a few months old when his parents moved to Tanzania (Tanganyika) in East Africa to become teachers for the Lutheran missionary society, Greg grew up on the slopes of Mount Kilimanjaro. His father was the founder and development director of the Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Center, the nation's first teaching hospital, and his mother founded the International School Moshi to educate the children of expatriates working in the region. He had three younger sisters, the youngest, Christa, suffered from severe epilepsy and Greg became her protector.

 

Greg's life as a humanitarian, international peace-maker and mountaineer took root in this fertile African environment. Surrounded by children of many races and religions, he learned a number of languages from the children with whom he attended school. Mountain climbing became a passion when Greg climbed Mt. Kilimanjaro at age 11. The Mortensons returned to the United States and settled in Roseville, Minnesota in 1973.

 

Greg enlisted in the US Army, where he trained as a medic. After two years in Germany, he was honorably discharged in 1977. He entered Concordia College in Minnesota on a football scholarship, later transferring to the University of South Dakota. Graduating with honors in nursing and chemistry, he entered Case Western University's medical school. Unfortunately, shortly thereafter, Dempsey Mortenson died and Greg returned home to help support his family.

 

Christa's sudden death had a profound affect on Greg. Having turned to mountain climbing for a sense of freedom, he lacked purpose in his life. Living in the San Francisco Bay Area, he worked in a number of hospitals to finance his climbing expeditions in the Sierras of California and as far away as the Himalayas of Nepal. Greg decided on a dramatic gesture in memory of Christa that changed his life forever in 1993.


Greg Mortenson, a superb mountain climber in great physical condition, joined an expedition of English, Irish, French and American climbers, who were attempting to climb K2, which crowns the Karakoram Range that divides China from Pakistan. Second in height to Mount Everest, K2's razor-sharp cliffs pose a daunting challenge to all climbers.


Greg's pledge to place an amber bracelet from Tanzania belonging to Christa on K2's summit as a memento brought him face to face with his mortality. Of the 16 climbers who made it to the summit of K2, four died during their descent. On the way up, Mortenson stopped to help a fellow climber who collapsed and was unable to return to base camp. After a grueling 78-hour rescue, an exhausted Mortenson became hopelessly lost in the snow.


Starving and disoriented, he wandered into the village of Korphe. The villagers were Balti, ethnic Tibetans and Shia Muslim, who fed, sheltered and nursed the frozen stranger back to health. Life was one of scarcity, without modern conveniences in this remote forbidding landscape, but they shared what they had.

 

Mortenson, deeply moved by the kindness and generosity of these people, who gave a stranger so much when they had so little, learned their language and customs. Poor by western standards, but rich in humanitarian spirit, the thing they lacked but wanted most was a school for their children. Without a teacher, the children gathered every day in an open field, where the older children tried to relay whatever they had learned from the last teacher to pass through. Using sharpened sticks for pencils, they scratched figures in the frozen earth.

 

Greg Mortenson found a challenge more inspiring than any mountain in the most unlikely of places. He promised the children of Korphe that he would return and build them a school. Back in California, he worked long shifts, often living out of his car, to raise the estimated $12,000 to build Korphe a school. He got no response of note from 580 letters sent to celebrities known for their philanthropy. However, students at the elementary school where his mother invited him to speak got the ball rolling by raising several hundred dollars in pennies.

 

Following that initial success, Dr. Jean Hoerni read a short article on Mortenson's effort published in the American Himalayan Society's newsletter. The Swiss-born physicist, as well as mountaineer, was a millionaire philanthropist, a pioneer of microprocessors and a founder of the Silicon Valley semiconductor industry. Initially skeptical, Dr. Hoerni funded Mortenson first school building effort.


Since those inauspicious beginnings, Greg Mortenson has built over 131 schools in some of the poorest, most inhospitable and violent places in Afghanistan and Pakistan. These schools have provided education to over 58,000 children, including 44,000 girls. Along the way, he co-founded (with Dr. Jean Hoerni) and directs the non-profit Central Asia Institute, and is founder of the educational charity Pennies For Peace. He is the co-author of the #1 New York Times bestseller Three Cups of Tea: One Man's Mission To Promote Peace... One School At A Time (Penguin 2007), with a sequel, Stones Into Schools: Promoting Peace with Books, Not Bombs, in Afghanistan and Pakistan released December 1, 2009 (Viking 2009).


Residing with his wife Dr. Tara Bishop, a clinical psychologist, and their two children in Montana, Greg was nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize in 2009, but unfortunately he was passed over for President Obama. In November 2009, U.S. News & World Report magazine featured Mortenson as one of America's Top Twenty Leaders in 2009. PARADE Magazine, the world's largest weekly periodical, featured him in an article on November 22, 2009.

 

Greg has received numerous awards including the Sitara-e-Pakistan ("Star of Pakistan"), Pakistan's highest civil award for his 15 years of humanitarian service promoting girls' education in rural areas (2009), the Golden Fleur-de-lis Award from Comune Firenze, Italy 2006, District School Board - Award For Peace Toronto, (Canada)2010 and Jeanette Rankin Peace Award - Institute for Peace 2004. He has also been given many honorary doctorate degrees from schools such as Saint Louis University, MO 2009, Loyola University Chicago, IL 2009, and University of Pennsylvania, PA 2010. (Sources: www.achievement.org, www.gregmortenson.com/biography/, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greg_Mortenson)





A Battle Worth Fighting

By John Burl Smith



The awarding of the Nobel Peace Prize to Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. (1964) recognized his life's work of standing up against violence, injustice and war. Dr. King demonstrated an intrepid spirit, audacious courage and an indomitable will in the face of bigotry, hatred and oppression of the weak by the strong. It reflected the belief that all people's humanity hangs in the balance when war, whether it is nation against nation or a nation against one people, is the preferred solution to problems rather than human discourse.

 

The 2010 Nobel Committee's selection of United States President Barack Obama was a retreat from those noble standards by passing over such a worthy individual as Greg Mortenson. Rather than being humbled by the prize, Mr. Obama has become arrogantly aggressive prosecuting a war that is killing more elderly, women and children than combatants.

 

Mortenson has proven that bullets and bombs will never win the hearts and minds of as many people as books and education. Building schools to educate primarily girls in places where people are thought to be hostile to that concept, religiously intolerant, ignorant and too poor to care, Mortenson is seen much like how former American slaves saw St. Katharine Drexel, who built schools for slaves and Native Americans in the early 20th century. Very measured in his comments but very clear in his intent, he is opposed to the US' bomb first and talk later strategy.


Mortenson is quick to outline his strategy, "Well, I was very fortunate to grow up in Tanganyika, Tanzania, East Africa. My-- it was a very wonderful time; President Julius Nyerere was a visionary president. My father gave me this fairly hard reading book when I was nine years old, called Reverence for Life by Dr. Albert Schweitzer, a medical missionary in Congo. Subsequently, I've learned from it, all life is sacred, animals, plants and humans. We're all created, we're sacred and we must respect life. I've had the good fortune to meet tens of thousands of kids, good people, in the military and people here in the U.S.


Fighting terrorism only perpetuates a cycle of violence; there should be a global priority to 'promote peace' through education and literacy, with an emphasis on girls' education. I believe that education and literacy for girls globally is the most important investment all countries can make to create stability, bring socio-economic reform, decrease infant mortality, decrease the population explosion, and improve health, hygiene, and sanitation standards globally. You can drop bombs, hand out condoms, build roads or put in electricity, but unless the girls are educated, a society won't change."

 

Undaunted by the fact that in these societies males dominate everything, Mortenson insists, "There is an African proverb which says, 'If we educate a boy, we educate an individual. But if we can educate a girl, we educate a community.' What that means is when girls grow up and become mothers, they are the ones who promote the value of education in the community. The education of girls has very powerful impacts in a society. Number one, infant mortality is reduced. Number two, the population is reduced. Third, the quality of health improves. And, from my own observation, when girls learn how to read and write, they often teach their mother how to read and write. Boys, we don't seem to do that as much. Educating girls is very powerful.

 

One example is Aziza from the tribal areas. She's the first educated female out of 4,000 people in her valley. In elementary school the boys threw stones at her. Teachers refused to teach her in high school. But she persevered, graduating in 1998 and at a cost of $800 got two years of maternal healthcare training. Before she started working in her valley in 2000, 20 women a year died in childbirth. Nine years later, as a midwife, not one woman has died in childbirth."


Mortenson relies on an age old technique for success no matter how hostile the people. "These are the people we deal with. And we're working in Afghanistan in quite heavily Taliban areas now. We've started schools this year in five new provinces, which include Urozgan, Nuristan, and Kunar, which have lots of Taliban. The reason we're successful is we work very closely with the elders to get community 'buy-in' when we set up a school.  We provide the teacher training, materials, and skill labor. But the community must provide free land, free resources and free labor--2,000 to 5,000 days of free manual labor. So, if they're willing to do it, 'buy-in,' they become invested in the school. And that's one of the reasons I think the Taliban have not destroyed or bombed or shut down any of our schools."

 

Audaciously, Mortenson remains steadfast in his commitment even in the face of Pres. Obama's military escalation. "There are some things worth fighting for, so our work will go on whether or not the US has military there or not in that we work so closely with the elders. First, when President Obama had nine meetings to ascertain or decide whether or not to deploy troops to Afghanistan, those meetings were held in secrecy, behind closed doors. There was no public debate. There were no congressional hearings. There was no media involved. We can't run democracy in secrecy. And it doesn't matter whether it's George Bush or Obama.


The other thing is that there was no consultation with the elders or the shura in Afghanistan. Every province has three to five dozen shura. And these are elders. They're poets, warriors, businessmen and even a few women. They're not elected; they've kind of risen up through the ranks. These are the real people with integrity and power in Afghanistan. So when this decision was made to deploy troops, there was no consultation with the elders. They felt very marginalized by it because when going into another's country, they want to at least have a part and a say in it. It's not difficult. It can be done at a district level, or local level, or national level."

 

When one looks at the numbers and the reality of America's intervention in Afghanistan history is not on our side. For 2,000 years the Afghans have fought wars with Genghis Khan, the Ottomans, Mongols, Greeks, Russians, British, and now America. Afghans have won every battle. "I've talked with Commandant Conway, who's a Marine Corps commander and he very strongly, emphatically said 'No military has ever won a battle here and we are not going to win a battle here either. So we've got to be broader in our solution.' I can also say, and Generals Petraeus and McChrystal will all tell you, there is no military solution in this country."

 

Mortenson follows up with this caveat, "It costs the US a million dollars a year to keep one soldier in Afghanistan. That's $30 billion for the new 30,000 troops. With $1 million we could build 30 or 40 schools. And in one generation we could educate over 20 to 30,000 kids. Vice President Joe Biden and George Will, the conservative columnist, recommended pulling troops out but bombing more. The one thing that the elders say is, 'please, do not bomb and kill civilians.' That is the number one way to antagonize people."

 

America would be far more successful if it was as committed to educating people as it is to killing them. Dead they learn nothing but put a book in their hand and you create a live friend. (Sources: http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/28775441/, www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/01152010 and www.ikat.org)






Intuit's Vibe

Colonies Still?

By Mumia Abu-Jamal



One of the greatest theorists, analysts and critics of colonialism was the late Martinican psychiatrist Frantz Fanon, but Dr. Fanon's work dwelled on the crises of colonialism in Africa.

 

We like to think that colonialism was a problem of yesteryear -- the '60's, '70's and early '80's. It's history -- right?


Well, what really matters isn't what we think, but what others in those countries think. We should also note that things change; sometimes in form but not in essence.


Earlier this year, a group of Pakistani intellectuals, activists, lawyers and political leaders produced a brief but collective report detailing the problems facing the nation. The 12-page report, entitled "Making Pakistan a Tenable State," lists 185 points of concern. Among them is the following, pt. 14 which states:


Today, Pakistan finds itself fully trapped in the whirl of liberalization, globalization, privatization and the so-called war on terror. The economic agreements and covenants bind Pakistan to follow policies dictated from the outside. Similarly, the strategies and covenants bind Pakistan to defend itself against foreign aggression are hugely dependent upon the defense related agreements signed with the United States.

 

Frequent visits to Pakistan of the officials of the departments of state and defense are indicative of the advices of the superpower we are obliged to follow. Small wonder, Pakistan is recognized all over the world as a client state of the United States.

 

It's like the 21st century version of colony. For, if a nation can't freely make its own foreign policy, and must abide by the will of another, client is but a polite term. The report covers Pakistan's colonial history, when it was part of India, when it was once known as East and West Pakistan divided by a vast expanse of Indian Territory, and the control of the political elites by the moneyed classes.

 

When we speak of such states as "democracies" we are hardly being honest. They are democracies in name only' client-states of the superpower.






Politics Y2K10

Going Rogue in Combat Boots

By William Astore



Here's a bit of cheery news: Last week, Secretary of Defense Robert Gates met with the nation's top defense company executives, including the CEOs of those mega-military-industrial combines Lockheed Martin and Boeing, and called for a "closer partnership." He also made them a promise. He pledged, according to his spokesman, "to work with the White House to secure steady growth in the Pentagon's budgets over time."


Let's put that pledge in context. Last week, President Obama did something common in the Bush years, something he swore never to do; he requested a supplemental $33 billion over and above the fiscal year 2011 defense budget, mainly for his Afghan surge. That sum, when appropriated by Congress, will bring the total official Pentagon budget to $708 billion dollars ($159 billion of which will be directly slated for Afghan and Iraq war costs). To put that sum in context, it's close to what the rest of the world combined spends on military matters. And you can be guaranteed of one thing: this won't be the last supplemental request of 2011.

 

By the way, if you were to add up the real "defense" budget, including funds for the Department of Homeland Security, the Energy Department (which handles the U.S. nuclear arsenal), veterans' care, the State Department's planned near-billion-dollar expansion of its embassy in Pakistan into a mega-command post for the region and the planned doubling of the number of personnel in its already monstrous embassy in Baghdad for a similar purpose, and many other relevant things, you would be closing in on $1 trillion per year.

 

Meanwhile, in December 2009, the total funds Congress has so far appropriated since 2001 only for our two wars topped $1 trillion dollars, with no end in sight, and that figure doesn't include projected future costs ranging from care for soldiers wounded in those wars to the cost of replenishing worn out military equipment. At the war-fighting level, the Congressional Budget Office has already projected direct war costs over the next decade at $867 billion.


The Pentagon's 2011 budget is already the highest since World War II, according to defense analyst Winslow T. Wheeler. Now, consider that the secretary of defense has just "pledged" more of the same for years to come. And note that none of this -- with the possible exception of that $33 billion supplemental request -- is considered particularly controversial by anyone who matters in Washington, or worth much front-page news attention. Sums that put health-care reform in the shade cause barely a stir. In other words, the Pentagon rules the roost and it could get a lot worse.

 

 

DISHing It Up Hot!

On Collateral Damage!

By Dot



Far removed from the violence, we call their suffering collateral damage. They do not make the decisions and exert no power or influence over the officials running their country. Many are too young to care for themselves, but they are the biggest losers and worst victims of the decisions made by their elders and foreign occupiers, who promise to liberate them from oppression and injustice.

 

According to Afghanistan Rights Monitor (ARM), more than 1,050 people under age 18 years were killed in 2009 alone. While the Afghan human rights watchdog has linked 64 percent of those deaths to Taliban militant actions, all sides in the Afghanistan war bear blame for the plight of young people in this impoverished war torn country.

 

Press-ganged, sexually exploited, deprived of health and education and illegally detained by all sides, children were killed in suicide attacks, roadside bombings and Predator drone air strikes. And as the war enters its ninth year with a pledge by the US to stay the course with more boots on the ground, the situation is likely to get worse for Afghan children.

 

ARM has called on Afghan authorities to set up an official child protection agency and work in cooperation with all the warring parties to protect children's rights. But, tensions are running high in the wake of a report that eight unarmed students were killed by Western military forces in Kunar province in late December. The deaths sparked a series of demonstrations and anti-government violence, fueling distrust and minimizing the likelihood that changes will be instituted that lead to the protection of young people.

 

In the meantime, children continue to suffer. And, while we are far removed from the violence and carnage created by our military-industrial complex, we are nonetheless responsible for the collateral damage. Our tax dollars, borrowed and otherwise provided, make war possible.




Disgruntled feels: Betrayed! I know it is unpopular to criticize President Obama. His supporters will loudly shout that he must be given time to bring change about! Some even want black folks like me to say nothing about his silence on issues of importance to our community. After all, he is president of the entire country and not the black community. I even empathize and not question the reasons they idolize and want to protect the image he projects. After all, our children need positive role models. But, I am also a realist, as well as an idealist, who would like for our children to see something more than fluff-- a dashing appearance and a way with words are not enough. I recognized the subterfuge, a coup of sorts that put him in the Oval Office. Times are tough and are likely to get a lot rougher. What better time to have a black face claiming to hold the reins of power? Even though I knew Obama was and is controlled by the same interests than controlled his predecessors, I foolishly expected more, against my better judgment. The only difference between his predecessor and he on the issues that matter most to me and my ilk is the silk with which he delivers his teleprompter-assisted speeches. That is simply not enough to silence this critic, who feels betrayed by his failure to deliver on the promise of change.



Disgruntled wants to know: Press reports over the last year have quoted Admiral Mike Mullen 17th Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General David H. Petraeus, head of the Central Command in Afghanistan, Gen. Stanley McChrystal, top U.S. Commander in Afghanistan, and General James T. Conway, Commandant US Marine Corps, as saying they believe "the US will not get a military victory in Afghanistan." These are the men who were behind the increase in US forces. If it costs a million dollars a year to keep one US soldier in Afghanistan which adds up to $30 billion for the new 30,000 troops and all these generals admit there will not be a military victory in the war, why do they keep sending young kids to die? Could it be to protect oil and gas pipelines, along with the CIA drug trade? With the same $1 million we could build 30 or 40 schools that will educate over 30,000 kids in one generation. Why aren't we dropping books on Afghanistan and Pakistan rather than bombs? That would be much cheaper and we would be making friends instead of growing enemies.



Disgruntled says: Black voters along with the young, elderly, women and other minorities gave President Obama and the Democrats an overwhelming victory in November 2008. They promised if we gave them majorities in the US Senate and House of Representatives, they would give us change. Once in office, Mr. Obama flushed change down the toilet, put black people at the back of the line and joined the status quo. Saving the economy -- bailing out Wall Street, i.e., banks, insurance and mortgage companies -- the very crooks that caused the problem - became the priority. Consumer credit reform turned out to be a huge profit for credit card companies. Healthcare reform, if passed, will probably become a big windfall for healthcare providers. Ending the War in Iraq became a prelude to escalating the war in Afghanistan and drones killing civilians in Pakistan. And, what did we get out of the deal except, higher interest rates and fees from the banks we saved, increased foreclosures, no relief from high drug prices, higher food and fuel prices, higher unemployment, no SS COLA, no help for the inner city and no job program. The people got screwed while Democrats got richer from campaign contributions. Now, they are back asking for help to keep their majority in Congress this November. We got nothing from the Democrats, so we should give them what they gave us nothing. They saved the economy, let the economy save them!

 



Mailbox: E-Mails, Faxes and Telephone Calls



Email www.sauvessanges.com ...Most Americans oppose Afghanistan troop boost: poll... Overall, 40 percent of those surveyed support the conflict, with 58 percent opposed. The CNN/Opinion Research Corporation survey was conducted by telephone October 30-November 1. Its sampling error was plus or minus three percentage points. An earlier CNN survey conducted in mid-October showed 59 percent of respondents opposed a troop increase, while 39 percent were in favor. It also found substantial misgivings about the Kabul government, with 90 percent saying Afghanistan would not have a stable government within the next 12 months.



Email www.niemanwatchdog.org...There Hasn't Been Two Seconds Of Intelligent Discussion About Living Standards In Afghanistan...By John Hanrahan...The poverty in Afghanistan is almost beyond imagining. Thirty Afghans die from TB every day; life expectancy is 43 years; per capita income is $426; only 13% have access to sanitary drinking water; fewer than one in four are literate; access to electricity is among the lowest in the world. Conditions for women are brutal. If Obama plans to address these issues, he's pretty much keeping it secret, points out world poverty expert Jeffrey Sachs. But without addressing them, can stepped- up American military involvement succeed? Or is it bound to fail? Columbia University economist Jeffrey D. Sachs, one of the foremost experts on extreme poverty in underdeveloped nations, says it is past time for the US to end its war in Afghanistan. Sachs believes the US should reverse its priorities and fund major sustainable development programs, which would not only help reduce Afghanistan's overwhelming poverty but would be a surer way to help achieve greater U.S. security.



Email http://news.bbc.co.uk ...US warned on deadly drone attacks...The US has been warned that its use of drones to target suspected terrorists in Afghanistan and Pakistan may violate international law. UN human rights investigator Philip Alston said the US should explain the legal basis for attacking individuals with the remote-controlled aircraft. He said the CIA had to show accountability to international laws which ban arbitrary executions. Drones have killed about 600 people in north-west Pakistan since August 2008. Mr Alston, the UN Special Rapporteur on Extrajudicial Executions, told the BBC: "My concern is that these drones, these Predators, are being operated in a framework which may well violate international humanitarian law and international human rights law. The onus is really on the government of the United States to reveal more about the ways in which it makes sure that arbitrary executions, extrajudicial executions, are not in fact being carried out through the use of these weapons." The US told the UN in June that it has a legal framework to respond to unlawful killings. It also said the UN Human Rights Council and the General Assembly have no role in relation to killings during an armed conflict. But Mr Alston described that response as "simply untenable".



Email trelaster@rocketmail.com ...In 1998, Dick Cheney, former US vice-president and chief executive of a major oil services company, remarked: "I cannot think of a time when we have had a region emerge as suddenly to become as strategically significant as the Caspian." But the oil and gas there is worthless until it is moved. The only route which makes both political and economic sense is through Afghanistan." So, Cheney set out to make it happen. On the subject of Afghanistan, I got an email about the clip at www.youtube.com/watch?v=p7E_IHZTTCY. Produced by Kai Roberts and directed by Paradise, the Arkitech of X-Clan, Afghanistan (HerStory) is a brilliant spoken word video by Bro. Jasiri X. The video is well worth viewing.



Email www.cubanews.ain.cu ...Cuban Doctors Help More than 18,000 Haitians Earthquake Victims...Cuban health collaborators in Haiti have served more than 18,000 victims of the earthquake, according to the head of emergency medical brigade, Yilliam Jimenez. In the devastated Caribbean island 417 collaborators, along with 240 young Haitian medical students make up a force of 657 men and women helping the needy. Via telephone conversation with the Round Table TV program, he said that Cubans had done over a thousand surgeries, 800 of them on the elderly, at different facilities. "We have 14 operating rooms with 16 surgical teams, at six hospitals, and will set up two more." Praising the quick and timely intervention to save lives, Jimenez said, "The Cuban physicians specialized in general medicine, also offered consultations in squares, parks and public spaces where large numbers of Haitians gather. While we see many U.S. troops in the streets, the aid has not arrived. There are 344 Cuban medics who were working in Haiti before the disaster, at two improvised hospitals, only two of them were injured in the earthquake, both remained to assist the disaster victims. Approximately 400 Haitian medical interns, who have completed medical degrees on full scholarships in Cuba, are assisting Cuban doctors working in all 10 administrative regions of Haiti. Cuba has provided free public health care to the poor of Haiti since 1989 - the only public medicine available in that country. During the recent coup and subsequent US/French/Canadian invasion which deposed the Aristide presidency, Cuban doctors continued to provide medical care when other hospitals closed down and doctors fled the country."