The DISH

Unbossed and unbought news and information you can use

Vol. 13 No. 34…Dedicated to the Dialogue on Race…August 22, 2010

 

Intuit's Vibe

Perhaps the World Ends Here

By Joy Harjo



The world begins at a kitchen table.

No matter what, we must eat to live.

The gifts of earth are brought and prepared,

Set on the table.

So it has been since creation,

And it will go on.

We chase chickens or dogs away from it.

Babies teethe at the corners.

They scrape their knees under it.

It is here that children are given instructions

On what it means to be human.

We make men at it, we make women.

At this table we gossip,

Recall enemies and the ghosts of lovers.

Our dreams drink coffee with us

As they put their arms around our children.

They laugh with us at our poor falling-down selves

And as we put ourselves back together

once again at the table.



This table has been a house in the rain,

An umbrella in the sun.

Wars have begun and ended at this table.

It is a place to hide in the shadow of terror.

A place to celebrate the terrible victory.

We have given birth on this table,

And have prepared our parents for burial here.

At this table we sing with joy, with sorrow.

We pray of suffering and remorse.

We give thanks.

Perhaps the world will end at the kitchen table,

While we are laughing and crying,

Eating of the last sweet bite.

 

 



Bit of History

George Washington Carver (1861-1943)



"It is not the style of clothes one wears, neither the kind of automobile one drives, nor the amount of money one has in the bank, that counts. These mean nothing. It is simply service that measures success." George Washington Carver

 

Born January 10, 1864 near Diamond, Missouri on the farm of Moses Carver, George Washington Carver never knew the identity of his father, although he believed his father was a slave from a neighboring farm. Born near the end of the Civil War, an infant Carver and his mother were kidnapped by Confederate night-raiders. Moses Carver found and reclaimed Carver after the war; however, his mother was never located. Moses and Susan Carver reared George and his brother as their children. On the farm, Carver fell in love with nature, earning the nickname 'The Plant Doctor.'

 

Carver began his formal education at age twelve. Racial segregation and the absence of schools for black children near his adopted parents' home forced Carver to move to Newton County, Missouri, where he worked as a farm hand and studied in a one-room schoolhouse. He attended Minneapolis High School in Kansas. Racial barriers made college entrance difficult. Carver finally gained acceptance to Simpson College in Indianola, Iowa; he was its first black student.

 

Since he was intent on a science career and Simpson offered no science courses, Carver transferred to Iowa State College of Agriculture and Mechanic Arts (Iowa State University) in 1891. He earned a Bachelor of Science degree (1894) and a Master of Science degree in bacterial botany and agriculture (1897). On graduating, he became the first black to join its faculty.

 

In 1897, Booker T. Washington, founder of the Tuskegee Normal and Industrial Institute, convinced Carver to come south and serve as the school's Director of Agriculture. At Tuskegee, he developed his crop rotation method, revolutionizing southern agriculture.

 

Because the US economy was heavily dependent on agriculture during this era, Carver's method proved significant. Devastated by years of civil war, no longer able to exploit slave labor and because its soil had been depleted by years of growing only cotton and tobacco, the economy of the farming south was in shambles. Carver convinced farmers to use his method of soil rotation, which helped the region recover.

 

Carver educated farmers to alternate soil-depleting cotton and tobacco crops with soil-enriching ones, such as peanuts, peas, soybeans, sweet potato and pecans. And to help market the new crops, Carver discovered three hundred uses for peanuts and hundreds more for soybeans, pecans and sweet potatoes. Among the listed items that he suggested to southern farmers to help them economically were his recipes and improvements to/for: adhesives, axle grease, bleach, buttermilk, chili sauce, fuel briquettes, ink, instant coffee, linoleum, mayonnaise, meat tenderizer, metal polish, paper, plastic, pavement, shaving cream, shoe polish, synthetic rubber, talcum powder and wood stain. However, Carver only applied for three patents.

 

Carver also worked to develop industrial applications from agricultural crops. During World War I, he found a way to replace textile dyes formerly imported from Europe. He produced 500 different shades of dye and was responsible for inventing (1927) a process to produce paints and stains from soybeans.


Carver neither patented nor profited from most of his ideas. He freely gave them to mankind. About his ideas he said, "God gave them to me. How can I sell them to someone else?"

 

Carver received an honorary doctorate from Simpson College in 1928. He was an honorary member of the Royal Society of Arts in London, England. In 1923, he received the Spingarn Medal given annually by the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP). In 1939, he received the Roosevelt medal for restoring southern agriculture. On July 14, 1943, U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt honored Carver with a national monument dedicated to his accomplishments. The area of Carver's childhood near Diamond Grove, Missouri, preserved as a park, became the first area designated as a national monument to a black American in the US. Dozens of majority black schools across the USA are named in his honor.


In a culture in which maximizing individual satisfaction is a cornerstone of the free enterprise economy, it is difficult to imagine the selflessness of Carver's actions in giving the world his ideas for improving agriculture, rather than trying to enrich himself. Carver donated his life savings to establish the Carver Research Foundation at Tuskegee to continue research in agriculture. The epitaph on his tombstone reads: "He could have added fortune to fame, but caring for neither, he found happiness and honor in being helpful to the world." George Washington Carver died at Tuskegee on January 5, 1943. (Sources: http://inventors.about.com and www.aaregistry.com.





Politics Y2K10

Modified Foods and Toxic Chemicals (Excerpts)

By Rosalind Peterson



Genetically Modified foods and toxic chemicals are finding their way into the food you eat and other products at an alarming rate. The United States Department of Agriculture (U.S.D.A.), the Environmental Protection Agency (E.P.A.), and the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (U.S. D.H.H.S.) are allowing genetically modified food and other products to be approved without considering or even knowing their negative impacts on human health, pollinators, the very food chain that we depend upon, and other key agriculture and climate issues.

 

One-hundred and sixty three regulatory agency reviews have been completed involving tomatoes, cotton, corn, canola, papaya, soybeans, potatoes, brassica napus, cantaloupe, flax, squash, beets, rice, radicchio, sugar beets, wheat, alfalfa, and other crops. Most of these basic foods are used worldwide and in the United States. The impact of the approval and introduction of these agricultural products will have long-lasting effects. It will take years to determine their harm on human health and the environment. Once introduced cross-pollination will contaminate existing plants, flowers, and other crops, changing their makeup as well.


Thus, after the introduction of these altered plants into the environment, it will take years of study to determine their impact on human health, pollinators, and cross-pollination problems. And once introduced they cannot be removed from our environment. They will also increase our dependence on chemical fertilizers, herbicides, pesticides, and insecticides, increasing human consumption of these toxins from our food sources. Our oceans, rivers, and streams will also be changed due to ever-increasing toxic fertilizer and chemical run-off into these water sources.

 

The USDA database, for the above 163 GE crops, lists the companies and universities involved in genetically modifying our crops to increase their profits and make us more dependent on their seeds, fertilizers, and chemicals. The list of chemical companies, seed companies, and universities includes, but is not limited to: Monsanto, Dow AgroSciences LLC, DuPont, DNA Plant Technology Corporation, Ciba-Geigy Corporation, Mycogen, Calgene Inc., Agritope Inc., Pioneer Hi-Bred International Inc., Aventis CropScience, AgrEvo, Zeneca & Petoseed, BASF, Rhone Poulenc Inc., Northrup King, Syngenta Seeds, Inc., Asgrow, Dekalb Genetics Corporation, Novartis Seeds, Plant Genetic Systems, Bejo Zaden BV, Upjohn, Vector, Bayer CropScience, and various universities.


The listing of "Trait Categories" varies from "Herbicide Tolerances," to "Altered Fatty Acids & Oils," "Insect & Virus Resistance," "Male Sterility," and "Phytate Degradation" along with other trait modifications. One of the most interesting and widespread of all the categories is DELAYED FRUIT RIPENING in tomatoes and cantaloupes.


Tomatoes are used as fresh vegetables, in soups, stewed tomatoes, catsup, for seasoning, sauces and a wide variety of other food products. They have been under the genetically modified barrage for years in order to remake them for mechanical picking. The taste of these modified tomatoes has made them almost unfit for fresh use as they taste nothing like the delicious tomatoes of our past. Now, there is interest, by many companies, to delay the ripening process so they can be stored for longer and longer periods of time. When the genetically modified tomatoes, now found in many supermarkets ripen, they still don't taste like their former counterparts…anyone can tell the difference by the harder feel, color, flavor, lack of moisture, and the tough or greasy skins. They don't fully ripen for the most part and don't have the taste and juice qualities for a great eating experience

 

The most important problem to be addressed is genetic food modification on our pollinators. Without the pollinators we won't have enough food to eat and we will lose the wide variety of food, flowers, and other plants that not only sustain wildlife but ourselves in the long run. If we damage this abundance for any reason then we all suffer from lack of variety, type of foods, and the nutrition that goes with those foods.

 

It appears that the USDA, the EPA, and DHHS are in league with huge chemical companies and other groups to bring these genetically engineered crops to market without public consent and adequate long-term testing. And it appears that these corporations and some universities are in league to promote this type of world for us to live within without our consent. Chemical companies want a monopoly on worldwide crops and seeds and they want them engineered so that they won't grow without their fertilizers and chemicals being used on them. All crops and seeds should not be patented or owned solely by chemical or seed companies.


The Obama administration's approach to agriculture has been to allow government agencies to approve genetically modified crops continuing Bush administration policies. Chemical companies like CropLife America, Monsanto, Bayer CropScience, Dow Chemical, and others are having their GE crops approved in almost record breaking numbers. Early in 2010, President Obama, during a Congressional recess, appointed Islam Siddiqui, a former CropLife America VP and lobbyist, to be the Chief Agricultural Negotiator in the Office of the United States Trade Representative despite over 90,000 objections to his nomination. Instead of going through the Senate congressional process which may have stopped his confirmation, Obama capitulated to the pro-chemical agribusiness industry choice with this recess appointment.

 

It is all driven by money…the public is the sacrificial lamb willing to allow chemical companies and other corporations to dictate what we eat and how safe it is for us and our children. We all have a choice to make…we can stop this process or we can allow these companies to dominate our food supplies, the very quality, quantity, and the types of food we eat.

 

Read the entire article at www.newswithviews.com, and for more information, visit www.agriculturedefensecoalition.org.





Venue for an Artist

Female Infants Growing Breasts

By John Robbins



People are very upset about this, and for good reason. Female infants in China who have been fed formula have been growing breasts.


According to the official Chinese Daily newspaper, medical tests performed on the babies found levels of estrogens circulating in their bloodstreams that are as high as those found in most adult women. These babies are between four and 15 months old. And the evidence is overwhelming that the milk formula they have been fed is responsible.

 

Synutra, the company that makes the baby formula consumed by these babies, says it's not their fault. They insist that "no man-made hormones or any illegal substances were added during the production of the milk powder."

 

What is the source of the hormones? A Chinese dairy association says the hormones could have entered the food chain when farmers reared the cows. "Since a regulation forbidding the use of hormones to cultivate livestock has yet to be drawn up in China," says Wang Dingmian, the former chairman of the dairy association in the southern province of Guangdo, "it would be lying to say nobody uses it." Bovine growth hormones are used in China, as they are in the US, to promote greater milk production.


An extraordinary number of food products sold in the U.S. today come from China. Could some of this tainted formula be making its way to the U.S.?

 

There is currently no way for consumers to know whether infant formula they might purchase has been made with milk products from China.


If this problem appears in the U.S., who will be held responsible? The retailers? The importers? The Chinese producers? Will anyone be called to account?

As I describe in my books The Food Revolution and Diet for a New America, and on my website, this isn't the first time something like this has happened. In the 1980s, doctors in Puerto Rico began encountering cases of precocious puberty. There were four-year-old girls with fully developed breasts, three-year old girls with pubic hair and vaginal bleeding, and one-year-old girls, not yet walking, whose breasts were growing. And it wasn't just the females. Young boys were also affected. Many had to have surgery to deal with breasts that had become grossly swollen.


Writing a few years later in the Journal of the Puerto Rico Medical Association, Dr. Carmen A. Saenz explained the cause. "It was clearly observed in 97 percent of the cases that the appearance of abnormal breast tissue was...related to local whole milk in the infants."


The problem was traced and found to stem from the misuse of hormones in dairy cows. When Dr. Saenz was asked how she could be certain the babies and children were contaminated with hormones from milk rather than from some other source, she replied simply: "When we take our young patients off... fresh milk, their symptoms usually regress."

 

Along with China, the US is today one of a few countries that allows growth hormones to be injected into dairy cows. Though banned in Canada, Japan, Australia, New Zealand and most of Europe, the use of these hormones in U.S. dairy is not only legal, it's routine in all 50 states.

 

The U.S. dairy industry assures us that this is not a problem. But there is a very real problem, and its name is Insulin-like Growth Factor-1 (IGF-1). Monsanto's own studies, as well as those of Eli Lilly & Co., have found a 10-fold increase in IGF-1 levels in the milk of cows that have been injected with bovine growth hormone (BGH).

 

Why is that a problem? A report by the European Commission's authoritative international 16-member scientific committee not only confirmed that excessive levels of IGF-1 are always found in the milk of cows injected with BGH. It also concluded that excess levels of IGF-1 pose serious risks of breast, colon and prostate cancer.

 

How serious is the increased risk? According to an article in the May 9, 1998 issue of the medical journal The Lancet, women with even a relatively small increase in blood levels of IGF-1 are up to seven times more likely to develop breast cancer than women with lower levels.

 

IGF-1 that is consumed by human beings in dairy products is rapidly absorbed into the bloodstream. It isn't destroyed by human digestion. And pasteurization is no help. In fact, the pasteurization process actually increases IGF-1 levels in milk.

 

What's a consumer to do? If at all possible, breast-feed your babies, and support breast-feeding friendly workplaces and other environments. It's hard to overstate the health advantages of breast-feeding for both mother and baby. They are enormous, particularly today when the possibility exists that commercially available infant formula could be contaminated with excess hormones.


If you buy dairy products, try to get them from organic sources. Organic milk products by law can't be produced with bovine growth hormone (BGH). Or look for dairy products that specifically say they are produced without BGH (also called recombinant bovine somatotropin, or rBST).


If you're going to eat cheese, remember that American-made cheeses are likely to be contaminated with BGH and excess levels of IGF-1 unless they're organic or labeled BGH-free. Most cheeses that are imported from Europe are safe, since much of Europe has banned the hormone.

 

Have you ever wondered why dairy products made from cows injected with the hormone aren't labeled? Monsanto, the original manufacturer of BGH, has aggressively and successfully lobbied state governments in the past to make sure that no legislation is passed that would require such labeling.

 

As if that wasn't enough, Monsanto has insistently sought to make it illegal for dairy products that are BGH-free to say so on their labels, unless the labels also included wording exonerating BGH. How does Monsanto justify such a ban? They say that allowing retailers to tell consumers a dairy product is BGH-free shouldn't be allowed, even if true, because it unfairly stigmatizes BGH.


Monsanto acts as though accurately labeling products would make them the victim of some irrational cultural bias. But the company's products are, in fact, responsible for untold damage to human health.

 

My compassion is not for Monsanto. My heart goes out to the babies in China and their families, to the children in Puerto Rico and their families, and to the millions of others who have been or will be adversely affected by the abuse of hormones in dairy production.



About Me: Author of The New Good Life, Diet For A New America, and many other bestsellers, Robbins is the only son of the founder of the Baskin-Robbins ice cream empire. Groomed to follow in his father's footsteps, he chose to "pursue the deeper American Dream…of a society at peace with its conscience because it respects and lives in harmony with all life forms...a society that is truly healthy, practicing a wise and compassionate stewardship of a balanced ecosystem." For more, visit www.johnrobbins.info.







Hood Notes

Study: Puberty Coming Earlier for US Girls

 

According to new research, girls in the US may be continuing to hit puberty at earlier ages. The findings suggest earlier development than what was reported in a 1997 study and show a worrying pattern, say the study's authors, led by Dr. Frank Biro of Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center. Girls who hit puberty earlier are more likely to engage in risky behavior, Biro's team notes, and might be at a higher risk for breast cancer, than their peers who develop later.

 

Doctors are unsure of what could be causing girls to develop at a younger age, but rising obesity rates may be to blame, they say.

 

In a study published today in Pediatrics, Biro's team examined about 1,200 girls aged 7 and 8 in Cincinnati, New York and San Francisco. Researchers, as well as the girls' doctors and nurses, used a standard measure of breast development to determine which girls had started puberty.

 

Compared to the 1997 findings from girls across the U.S., girls in the current study - especially white girls - were more developed at a younger age. As previous research has shown, there were also large differences in development based on race.

 

At age 7, approximately 10 percent of white girls and 23 percent of black girls had started developing breasts - compared to 5 percent of white girls and 15 percent of black girls in 1997, the authors write.

 

Among 8-year-olds in the study, 18 percent of white girls and 43 percent of black girls had entered puberty - an increase from around 11 percent of white girls from 1997, but the same as black girls in that year.


This study and another published in Pediatrics suggest that being overweight, both as a young child and growing up, makes girls more likely to enter puberty earlier. In the second study, Dr. Mildred Maisonet from Emory University's Rollins School of Public Health and her colleagues observed that gaining weight quickly in infancy - a predictor of later obesity - was linked to early puberty in girls in Great Britain.

 

Biro's team found that girls with a higher body mass index (BMI) - a ratio of weight and height - at age 7 and 8 were more likely to be developed than their thinner peers.

 

Those authors warn that their study population, although diverse, doesn't necessarily represent what's happening in all U.S. girls. But they are continuing to follow the girls in the study to see when the rest of them hit puberty, and what other factors might be related to their rate of development.

 

Biro thinks that rising rates of obesity could be a major reason why girls seem to be developing faster than they did even 13 years ago.

 

Researchers know that heavier girls are more likely to enter puberty early, Lee, of the University of Michigan, said. That could be because overweight people have more of a hormone known to be linked to development - but it could also be a matter of the actual nutrients that girls get from their diet, she said.


Lee and Biro said doctors are worried about both the psychological and physical health of girls who hit puberty at a young age.

 

Studies have shown that girls who develop early are more at risk for depression and often start having sex earlier than girls who develop later.


"For the 11-year old that looks like she's 15 or 16, adults are going to interact with her like she's 15 or 16, but so are her peers," Biro said. Girls who develop early "look physically older," he said. "It doesn't mean that they're psychologically or socially more mature."


In addition, women who spend more of their lives menstruating are at a higher risk for breast cancer - which, depending on when they hit menopause, could be a worry for girls who develop early.


Dr. Biro advises families to minimize the possible risk of early puberty in young daughters by including more fruits and vegetables in their diet and eating together as a family.  (Sources: http://link.reuters.com and http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/)






News You Use

Egg Recall

 

The egg recall has expanded again, this time involving a second Iowa egg company: Hillandale Farms of Iowa. The company said Friday some of its eggs, sold as late as Aug. 18, had the potential to be contaminated with salmonella.


The recall involves eggs distributed to 14 states: Arkansas, California, Iowa, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota, Texas, and Wisconsin. The egg recall brands include: Hillandale Farms, Sunny Farms, and Sunny Meadow in a variety of packages, including in 6-egg, 12-egg, 18-egg, and 30-egg cartons as well as five-dozen cases. In addition, loose eggs were packaged under the brand names Wholesome Farms and West Creek in 15- and 30-dozen tray packs.


Consumers are advised to check - again - the stamped numbers on the end of their egg cartons. The new egg recall involves two plants: P1663 and P1860 (the P stands for plant). If you have P1663 or P1860 stamped on your carton, look for the three-digit number nearby, often just to the right.


For cartons with P1663, the recall involves eggs packaged between 137 and 230 (the 137th day of the year is May 17; the 230th day is Aug. 18). For cartons stamped P1860, the recall involves eggs packaged between 099 and 230 (April 9 to Aug. 18).


Although most of these eggs have long ago been consumed, Hillandale Farms urges consumers to return any remaining eggs and cartons to the store where they were purchased. The stores should offer a full refund. If you have any questions, you can call the New Hampton, Iowa, company at (866) 262-4208.


This marks the third egg recall since Aug. 13. Wright County Egg, another Iowa producer, initiated the recall because federal and state officials had linked some of their eggs to illnesses associated with a surge in salmonella cases. On Wednesday, Wright County dramatically expanded the recall.


In announcing its recall Friday, Hillandale Farms confirmed that officials had linked some salmonella illnesses to its eggs. "There have been laboratory-confirmed Salmonella enteritidis illnesses associated with the shell eggs; the investigation is ongoing," the company said in a statement. (Source: www.medicinenet.com)


 



Disgruntled wants to know: A study conducted by the Environmental Working Group, a nonprofit organization in Washington, DC, discovered the coating on 40%, or two fifths, of all U.S. thermal activated paper receipts contain massive amounts of bisphenol A (BPA), the harmful chemical that is known to cause fertility problems and cancer. Other studies have found that BPA from receipts can transfer to skin and penetrate so deeply that it cannot be washed off and may even enter the bloodstream. Apparently, alcohol-based sanitizers can increase BPA penetration into the skin. High levels of BPA in people's urine were associated with cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and liver problems. People with the highest BPA levels were twice as likely to suffer from diabetes or cardiovascular problems as those with lower levels. Major retailers using the BPA-containing receipts include McDonald's, CVS, KFC, Whole Foods, Walmart, the U.S. Postal Service and Safeway, which had receipts with the highest level of BPA We live in a dangerous world fraught with innumerable hazards. But, who would have thought that store receipts could pose a health risk?



Disgruntled says: A recent news story touted the return of commercial fishing to the Gulf of Mexico. It showed commercial fishing vessels hauling in large caches of shrimp. Gulf commercial fishing had been suspended for months following the worst oil disaster in US history with the explosion of the Deepwater Horizon oil rig on April 20. The government has given an all clear on any long term harmful effects of the oil spill, even claiming most of the oil that freely flowed from the uncapped well has evaporated or been otherwise dispersed. This feel-good moment comes with a serious caveat. Non-governmental scientists examining the aftermath of this disaster claim the oil is still there. British Petroleum (BP) used millions of gallons of Corexit, a dispersant, so the oil has been broken into tiny toxic droplets or it is in underwater plumes. Moreover, there is scientific evidence that Corexit and oil have made their way into the food chain. Bottom line is, people should be extremely leery when the government makes blanket claims that we have nothing to fear, especially in situations such as this in which a huge multinational corporation stands to benefit. The public be damned! There are plenty of reasons to discount government propaganda.



Disgruntled feels: Occupied! While the Obama administration is not declaring "Mission Accomplished" in Iraq, a mistake made by the former White House resident George W Bush, who stood in front of a banner on the deck of the USS Abraham Lincoln in 2003 that made such a declaration, it is declaring an "end to major combat operations in Iraq." Seven years later combat troops may be leaving Iraq, but the war is far from over. Indeed more than 50,000 US combat-trained personnel will remain in that country under the pretext of training Iraqis to defend themselves, among other things. It is those other things that will keep the US in Iraq for an untold number of years. After all, there is oil under its sand. No longer at war, Iraq is officially occupied!







Mailbox: E-Mails, Faxes and Telephone Calls



Email www.jonesreport.com ...Food: The Ultimate Secret Exposed...Advocacy groups recommend that consumers should avoid BPA by doing the following: (1) Search for unlucky 7. Avoid #7 plastic food or beverage containers (check for the numbered triangle on the bottom of the container). Safer plastics for storing your consumables are numbers 2, 4, and 5. Better yet, go for ceramic, stainless steel, or glass. (2) Look askance at cans. Favor fresh, frozen or shelf-stable boxed or pouched food over canned food (at least until food makers stop lining their cans with BPA). If you can't completely avoid cans, be aware that BPA is prone to leach into acidic foods like tomatoes or pasta sauces. BPA is fat soluble, too, so if you eat canned tuna, make sure it's packed in water, not oil. (3) Keep plastic cool. Avoid heating any plastic container, since this promotes leaching. It's probably wise never to heat or microwave food in any kind of plastic. Most plastics contain one additive or another, and none are likely to benefit human health. If you tote your water in a metal bottle, check with the manufacturer to see what the lining is made out of--some could contain BPA.

 

Email www.reuters.com U.S. judge bans planting of genetically engineered beets...By Dan Levine...A federal judge on Friday banned the planting of genetically modified sugar beets engineered by Monsanto Co in a ruling that marks a major setback for the biotech giant. U.S. District Judge Jeffrey White ruled in 2009 that the U.S. Department of Agriculture had approved Monsanto's genetically modified sugar beets without adequate environmental study. Sugar beets account for over half of the nation's sugar supply. But conventional sugar beet seeds remain widely available and environmentalists filing suit said the judge's decision should not significantly affect sugar production. White's decision on Friday to impose the ban did not apply to crops already planted or harvested. It stems from a lawsuit brought by environmentalists over Monsanto sugar beets engineered to be resistant to the weed-killer Roundup. Roundup is also manufactured by Monsanto and was sold to farmers together with the genetically altered sugar beet seeds. "It's a victory for farmers, for the environment and for the public," said George Kimbrell, a senior staff attorney for the Center for Food Safety, plaintiffs in the case. Environmentalists have argued that the "Roundup Ready" crops have increased the use of herbicides and herbicide- resistant weeds. Monsanto has claimed in court papers that revoking the government's approval of its genetically modified seed could cost the company and its customers some $2 billion in 2011 and 2012.


Email actionalert@cspinet.org A human health crisis is brewing on our nation's farms. An estimated 70 percent of antibiotics used in the United States are fed to animals that are not sick, breeding antibiotic-resistant bacteria and causing costly, painful, and sometimes deadly human diseases. Last year, the Food and Drug Administration acknowledged the dangerous health risks of overusing antibiotics, yet the agency has done nothing to solve the problem. In June, the FDA released a set of principles for using antibiotics safely, but there's still no regulation in sight. The FDA is seeking public feedback on this issue, so please write today and tell the agency to prevent the overuse of antibiotics in animal agriculture.