The DISH

Unbossed and unbought news and information you can use

Vol. 13 Issue 1…Dedicated to the Dialogue on Race…January 3, 2010

 

 

Intuit's Vibe

Phenomenal Woman

By Maya Angelou (1978)


Pretty women wonder where my secret lies

I'm not cute or built to suit a fashion model's size

But when I start to tell them

They think I'm telling lies.

I say, it's in the reach of my arms

The span of my hips,

The stride of my step,

The curl of my lips.

I'm a woman phenomenally.

Phenomenal woman, that's me.


I walk into a room

Just as cool as you please,

And to a man,

The fellows stand or

Fall down on their knees.

Then they swarm around me,

A hive of honey bees.

I say, it's the fire in my eyes

And the flash of my teeth,

The swing of my waist,

And the joy in my feet.

I'm a woman phenomenally.

Phenomenal woman, that's me.


Men themselves have wondered

What they see in me.

They try so much

But they can't touch

My inner mystery.

When I try to show them,

They say they still can't see.

I say, it's in the arch of my back,

The sun of my smile,

The ride of my breasts,

The grace of my style.

I'm a woman phenomenally.

Phenomenal woman, that's me.


Now you understand

Just why my head's not bowed.

I don't shout or jump about

Or have to talk real loud.

When you see me passing

It ought to make you proud.

I say, it's in the click of my heels,

The bend of my hair,

The palm of my hand,

The need of my care,

'Cause I'm a woman phenomenally.

Phenomenal woman, that's me.





Bit of History

Klaus Martin Schwab


Born March 30, 1938 in Ravensburg, Germany, Klaus Martin Schwab holds a Doctorate in Economics (summa cum laude) from the University of Fribourg, a Doctorate in Engineering from the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology and a Master of Public Administration from the John F. Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University. Dr. Schwab is the recipient of a number of honorary doctorates from universities around the world, most recently the London School of Economics.

 

In 1971, Dr. Schwab founded the World Economic Forum (WEF) as a non-profit foundation committed to improving the state of the world. Today, the WEF is a global partnership of business, political, and intellectual leaders.

 

From 1972 to 2002, he was Professor of Business Policy at the University of Geneva. The author of several books and many articles, Dr. Schwab has yearly published the Global Competitiveness Report since 1979. Written by a team of economists, the report is an assessment of the potential for increasing productivity and economic growth of countries around the world. It is based on a methodology Dr. Schwab developed for measuring competitiveness based on productivity and sustainability.

 

From 1993-1995, Dr. Schwab served as a member of the UN High-Level Advisory Board on Sustainable Development. He was Vice-Chairman of the UN Committee for Development Planning from 1996-1998 and member of the Earth Council when it was located in Costa Rica.

 

In 2004, Schwab created the Forum of Young Global Leaders using the US$ 1 million prize money from the Dan David Prize he received that year. The foundation aims to bring together over 500 people under age 40 from all walks of life who have demonstrated their commitment to improving the state of the world, and encourage them to work together over the span of five years to identify and realize global change.

 

Dr. Schwab is the recipient of numerous international and national honors, and he holds numerous positions of civic, academic and editorial leadership. He was a member of the board of the Lucerne Festival, and has served on the company boards of The Swatch Group, The Daily Mail Group, and Vontobel Holding. He is an honorary professor of the Ben-Gurion University of Israel and the China Foreign Affairs University. Currently, he serves as Trustee for the Peres Center for Peace in Israel and the Ibrahim Hussein Museum and Cultural Foundation in Malaysia.


Dr. Schwab is a member of the Overseers' Visiting Committee at the JFK School of Government, an Advisory Board Member of the Center for International Development at Harvard University, a member of the Corporate Visiting Committee at MIT and a Member of the Royal Academy of Morocco. He is a member of the Editorial Board for Foreign Policy and World Link Magazine.


Dr. Schwab is married and the father of two. With his wife, Hilde Schwab, he co-founded in 1998 the Schwab Foundation for Social Entrepreneurship, a non-profit organization based in Geneva, Switzerland that supports social innovation projects around the world. His hobbies include cross country ski marathons and mountain climbing. (Sources: http://english.dl.gov.cn, http://en.wikipedia.org and http://fora.tv/)





News You Use

Gender Gap Report 2009



First conceived in January 1971, The World Economic Forum began as a patron of the European Commission and European industrial associations in Davos, Switzerland. Following the collapse of the Bretton Woods fixed exchange rate mechanism and the 1973 Arab-Israeli conflict, the Forum expanded its annual meeting from focusing on management to economic and social issues by inviting political leaders to Davos for the first time in January 1974.

 

The Forum continued to expand to include a Centre for Public-Private Partnerships which engages businesses, civil society and political authorities in initiatives ranging from improving health in India to alliances combating chronic hunger in Africa. In 2005, its Centre for Strategic Insight began issuing a Global Gender Gap Report (GGGR), an index that compares and ranks countries based on the status of women vis-à-vis men. Last year's index, released on October 27, 2009, reported major improvements in some surprising places. However, Nordic countries, with their homogeneous societies, remain highest on the equity scale.

 

The index seeks to provide an objective framework that allows countries to compare and contrast their societies with similarly situated neighbors within their region, while simultaneously comparing their standing internationally. By focusing on parity between women and men, girls and boys at whatever level of economic development a nation currently occupies, the index attempts to paint a realistic picture of obstacles individual societies face.


For instance, Lesotho moved into the top 10, showing a marked improvement from its 16th place in 2008 and 43rd in 2006. South Africa moved up dramatically--from 22nd place in 2008 to 6th in 2009. Both countries reflect major efforts to improve labor participation of women and gains made in parliament and cabinet positions made possible by instituting "quotas." Such societies have plenty of ground to make up because of their past histories of colonialism and apartheid. In contrast, the United States moved down to 31, three slots from 2008.

 

The Report's Gender Gap scores can be interpreted as the percentage of the gap between women and men that has been closed. Countries at the top have the greatest reduction in the gap between women and men, while lower ranking countries reflect the least progress.

 

The GGGR measures gender inequality in four critical areas: Economic participation and opportunity - outcomes on salaries, participation levels and access to high-skilled employment; Educational attainment - outcomes on access to basic and higher level education; Political empowerment - outcomes on representation in decision-making structures and Health and survival - outcomes on life expectancy and sex ratio. These categories allow the GGGR to "Assess countries on how well they are dividing resources and opportunities among males and females irregardless of the overall levels of these resources and opportunities. Providing a clear framework for assessing and comparing the relative gender gaps among societies, the GGGR makes it easy to identify those countries that are doing a good job and those doing poorly. The Report serves as a catalyst for greater awareness as well as greater exchange between policymakers." Go to www.weforum.org/gendergap and read the entire Global Gender Gap Report 2009.






Slave Descendants Deserve A GGGR

By John Burl Smith



The 2009 Global Gender Gap Report (GGGR) is truly a noteworthy undertaking and the plight of females in regards to inequality, sexism and discrimination deserves international attention. Moreover, it shows what can be done when powerful individuals and institutions unite and mobilize resources to address a problem. Concomitantly, when men cease wagging their heads in dismay, seemingly intractable problems become manageable, even solvable.


Victims of colonialism and slavery currently experience the widest gap in socioeconomic and political disparities of any ethnic or gender category around the world. By far, they are the most exploited and languish at the bottom of every positive or at the top of every negative variable used to measure "quality of life."


Beginning in the late 1400s, Europeans enslaved Africans and other Indigenous people to build the wealth they use to dominate the world today. Through avarice and brutality, the ancestors of those who run the world today established systems based on racial and cultural discrimination that continues to strangle the development and opportunities of colonial and slavery victims. Obviously, white people are committed to maintaining inequality, racism and discrimination as part of their heritage and the key to holding on to their wealth and power.

 

The goals pursued by the 2009 GGGR -- "Economic participation and opportunity - outcomes on salaries, participation levels and access to high-skilled employment; Educational attainment - outcomes on access to basic and higher level education; Political empowerment - outcomes on representation in decision-making structures and Health and survival - outcomes on life expectancy and sex ratio" - are admirable ones that address needed improvements. Aimed at reversing the inequalities women face, these principles advocate using "quotas" to achieve an equitable balance between men and women. As a matter of fact, the use of "quotas" in this instance is advocated by Americans as a furtherance of democracy and human rights.

 

Conversely, the situation is viewed as 'reverse discrimination' when victims of slavery are the objects of such remedial action in the United States (US). The world turned blind eyes and failed to speak on behalf of slave descendants when the US Supreme Court ruled that the use of "quotas" to end inequalities blacks endured violated white people's rights. Yet, the US is held up by groups like the World Economic Forum (WEF) as a model of equality, justice and fairness. If such criteria as used by the GGGR index were applied to the condition of slave descendants in America, US hypocrisy would be as clear to the world as gender inequality.

 

According to Klaus Schwab, WEF Founder and Executive Chairman, "Girls and women make up one half of the world's population and without their engagement, empowerment and contribution, we cannot hope to achieve a rapid economic recovery nor effectively tackle global challenges such as climate change, food security and conflict. The Forum works year-round with leaders on ways to close gender gaps through its Women Leaders and Gender Parity Programme, and this report underpins their work. The Global Gender Parity Group, a community of highly influential leaders from business, politics, academia, media and civil society, is 50% women and 50% men who seek to share best practices and identify strategies to optimize the use of talent."

 

Victims of colonialism and slavery are of both genders and make up well over 50% of the world's population; they need such a "year-round" advocate to close the racial gap. There are no prestigious groups seeking to enlighten the world about inequality levels in their societies and how these levels can be lowered.

 

Co-author Ricardo Hausmann, Director of the Centre for International Development at Harvard University, USA opined, "Out of the 115 countries covered in the report since 2006, more than two-thirds have posted gains in overall index scores, indicating that the world in general has made progress towards equality between men and women."


Director Hausmann is associated with a university that maintains an entrance policy that is discriminatory against slave descendants, whether in undergraduate or graduate school, not to mention professorships. Moreover many of its endowments were given by men who made their fortunes from the blood and sweat of slave labor. Unlike the issue of gender disparity, victims of colonialism and slavery were the world's economic engine for centuries and many of those in the forefront of the fight for women inherited fortunes tainted by slavery. It is far easier for such men to embrace a cause that will help their wives and daughters.

 

"The GGGR demonstrates that closing the gender gap in all aspects of life provides a foundation for a prosperous and competitive society. Leaders should act in accordance with this finding as they rebuild their battered economies and set a course for sustainable long-run growth," offered co-author Laura Tyson, Professor of Economics and Business Administration, University of California, Berkeley, USA. Such sentiments should reach beyond women, particularly in the case of slave descendants who served as the foundation of the US economy from its inception. Built on slave labor, the US Constitution still contains language (the 3/5 Compromise) that makes discrimination against slave descendants legal. Consequently, even if the gender gap reduces inequalities for white women, black women will continue to suffer.


Co-author Saadia Zahidi, head of the Forum's Women Leaders and Gender Parity Programme said, "Countries that do not fully capitalize on one-half of their human resources run the risk of undermining their competitive potential. We hope to highlight the economic incentive behind empowering women, in addition to promoting equality as a basic human right." Even though colonial victims and slave descendants taught the world much of what it knows about fighting for human rights, those in leadership around the world have not used that knowledge to fight inequality and discrimination against colonial victims and slave descendants.

 

"Thirteen out of the 14 variables used to create the Index are from publicly available 'hard data' indicators from international organizations, such as the International Labour Organization, the United Nations Development Programme and the World Health Organization." Therefore, these same data bases could be used to construct an index to measure the gap between slave descendants and slave masters in societies in which they live. The same people who care so much about gender inequality accept and some even engage in discrimination against slave descendants and victims of colonialism, or they would be acting just as forcefully to create initiatives to end those inequalities too.



Politics Y2K10

Discrimination against Women



The United Nations Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW) was adopted on December 18, 1979. It guarantees the right of women to be free from discrimination and sets out obligations for states to ensure legal and practical enjoyment of that right.

 

The Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW), which consists of twenty-three (23) experts on women's rights from around the world, is the independent body that monitors implementation of CEDAW.

 

Nations that sign and ratify the treaty are obliged to submit regular reports to the Committee on how the rights of the Convention are implemented. During its sessions, the Committee considers each nation's report and addresses its concerns and recommendations.


The CEDAW Committee formulates general recommendations and suggestions. It can also receive communications from individuals or groups of individuals submitting claims of violations of rights protected under the Convention and initiate inquiries into situations of grave or systematic violations of women's rights. However, these procedures are optional and only available where the concerned state has accepted them, since states can and do offer reservations to their ratification of the treaty.

 

Many countries that are signatory to the treaty have improved their laws, but in most cases, have failed to protect women from everyday violence and abuse. Numerous studies show that millions of women worldwide face discrimination of every description. Annually, hundreds of thousands of women are forced into prostitution; many suffer beatings at the hands of pimps, customers and policemen. Countless others endure domestic abuse.

 

According to UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, "Women's situation is not going to change unless men, particularly those in power, are willing to change their behavior. Changing mindset and habits of generations is not easy. We must work together to state loud and clear, at the highest level, that violence against women will not be tolerated, in any form, in any context."


Women activists, who work closely with the UN, note that since the 1995 World Summit in Beijing, some progress has been made to protect women's rights. But many feel much more needs to be done to achieve full recognition of women's rights as human rights.


When the UN Commission on the Status of Women convened its annual meeting in 2009, delegates expressed hope that new US leadership would act differently than the past US administration, which imposed harsh conditions for funding UN agencies working to help improve the lives of women in poor nations. It remains to be seen whether or not that optimism is justified, since the Obama administration has not ratified CEDAW.


The US signed the treaty in 1980; women's rights activists are hoping the Obama administration will ratify it and aid efforts to eliminate discrimination against women. For positive results, a powerful country like the United States must be part of the movement.




 

DISHing It Up Hot!

On Raising Sex Objects!

By Dot



I recently watched a PBS program - Raising a Girl with a Positive Body Image - that exposed ways in which society transmits to and influences impressionable young women to pursue an unrealistic body type. You know the one they were speaking about - the thin, emaciated looking, Barbie doll body, generally white, that is the only kind found on fashion runways and in style magazines. Don't forget the long straight hair that completes the sexy image that is broadcast constantly by all forms of media. Whether music videos or television commercials, young girls are subliminally encouraged to be sexual objects; sex sells everything from booze to vacuum cleaners.

 

The program reminded me of an incident that occurred during the summer my elder granddaughter turned three. We were in Wal-Mart. I promised to buy her an outfit, something reasonably priced that fit my meager budget. Sitting in the shopping cart dressed in a pink top and shorts, she eyed the selection of skirts and dresses like a seasoned shopper. For her inspection, I held up a blue jean skirt that I thought was cute; it fit my budget too. She adamantly shook her head and said, "Grandma, that's not my style." I was floored by this child of three, who was already on her way to becoming a hot pink sex object. Naturally, she settled on something in that color!

 

According to feng shui, her lucky colors are green and brown; she likes them, but pink holds sway. Who can fault her; pink has been the dominant color in most outfits she has worn her entire life? It is the color girls are dressed in from birth, a point made by the program.

 

Young girls are influenced by their parents, peers and the dominant society. Whether you like it or not, the latter two exerts the greater influence on what they choose to wear, their makeup and hair styles. For the young, it boils down to being liked. Everyone wants to be liked, especially young girls, and they dress to please and want a body image that is supposed to be pleasing.

 

Who do we blame when impressionable young people try to achieve an unrealistic body image via drugs or other unhealthy habits, such as purging? The media bear a tremendous responsibility for grooming young women to view themselves as sexual objects. Parents and the rest of society are also responsible for how young women and women, in general, are viewed.

 

The PBS program and web site at http://www.pbs.org/parents/raisinggirls/bodies/image.html offer some excellent parenting tips, including eating disorders, strategies and talking points to assist girls in developing healthy eating habits and exercising to manifest a positive body image. As parents and grandparents, we must strive to help our girls become positive contributors to society, rather than sex objects!





Disgruntled feels: Over-medicated! As a society, we rely far too heavily on medicine for every ache and pain; even soreness from exercising is medicated. Rather than making a life-saving change in lifestyle, we reach for a bottle of pills or rely on something more serious to make us feel good. Far be it for me to disparage marijuana and the other sundry illegal drugs when legal ones do far more harm. We pump our little ones with antibiotics, rather than take them off milk, because "milk is supposed to be good for growing bodies." So, to ease the ache of constant ear infections and to protect diary industry profits, doctors prescribe medicines; the regime also makes big pharma happy. We are so over-medicated that we no longer know what drug-free really means. It certainly does not refer to our public school zones, where a large percentage of the student body is given daily doses of the drug Ritalin or some other mind-altering legal substance.


Disgruntled says: It is that time of year again when people make resolutions and predictions for the New Year. For this New Year, I am resolved to make no promises about weight loss and such. I want to enjoy life as much as possible no matter my dress size. And, as far as predictions are concerned, I have never been accurate, even though I have been close to being right on a few occasions. With that thought in mind, I predict it will be a year like no other. Whether that is good or ill, only time will tell.

 

Disgruntled wants to know: Major General Anthony Cucolo III, who commands US forces in Northern Iraq implemented a policy in November that made it illegal for soldiers and civilian military personnel to become pregnant or cause a soldier to become pregnant, even though it may have been consensual. The policy was reviewed and rescinded by General Raymond Odierno, the top US Commander in Iraq. On its face, such a policy discriminates against women, whether you believe they have a place in war zones or not. However, can one reasonably expect a woman to do a soldier's job, which is basically killing, while with child? Moreover, do female soldiers implicitly sign a contract that forbids them from becoming pregnant on enlisting in the military?





Mailbox: E-Mails, Faxes and Telephone Calls



Email http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/ Making Them (R) Squirm... The President signed the appropriations bill today. Within the Appropriations Act is Sen. Al Franken's (D- MN) amendment prohibiting defense contractors from restricting their employees' abilities to take workplace discrimination, battery, and sexual assault cases to court. The measure was inspired by Jamie Leigh Jones, who was gang-raped by her co-workers while working for Halliburton/KBR in Baghdad. Many Republicans opposed the legislation - saying it was an unnecessary attack on their allies in the defense contracting business - and faced intense political blowback over their positions. The reason I think its good news isn't just on the substance (which it certainly is) but on the politics. Franken's amendment is driving Republicans crazy because they voted to protect rapists and are paying a political price for that. And now they are whining that Franken was somehow "uncollegial" because the amendment put them in an embarrassing position (which makes me wonder how many other things issues are swept under the rug because it makes members of the opposition uncomfortable.)

 

Email www.racialicious.com... Still Getting It Wrong on Affirmative Action...By Darrell Dawsey...Affirmative action suffers a public relations problem. Affirmative action is frequently discussed in terms of race -- both by proponents and opponents of the practice. The problem is the word "minority", which in our society (United States) has become a codeword for "Black." This is not only unfair, it is inaccurate: critics of "minority"-targeted initiatives present narrow-minded arguments that fail to accurately represent the full spectrum of people encompassed by the word "minority." Affirmative action not only is intended to benefit members of all under-represented ethnic groups (Native Americans, and under-represented Asians to name two), but it also benefits class, gender, and faith applicants. Opponents paint reasonable and useful policies with a tinge of racial favoritism to reinforces the notion that Blacks and Latinos, who occupy the bottom rung of our social hierarchy as undeserving minority groups. This supports the implications of the persistent, narrow belief that affirmative action is just a set of "racial preferences" -- when the truth is that the biggest beneficiaries of affirmative action have been white women. No, I'm not saying that blacks, Latinos, Arab-Americans and Asian-Americans haven't benefited also. (The University of Michigan, for instance, has 11 percent fewer minorities than in 2006, in part because affirmative action was outlawed.) But it's the idea that these minorities, not white women, are disproportionately helped by affirmative action that the news media completely ignores.

 

Email ...So long "Mr. P" ..."People may forget what you said. People may forget what you did. But, people will NEVER forget how you made them feel." ..On Thursday, December 31, 2009 Dr. William "Bill" Powell, Hall of Fame golfer and beloved humanitarian passed away surrounded by his family. His daughter (Renee), the second black female golfer on the PGA tour, offered her thanks to all the fans and friends who helped to make Mr. P's last year such a wonderful experience for him and his family. Services will be held at the United Methodist Church in Minerva, OH on Wednesday, Jan. 6 at 11:00 AM. For those who wish to honor his memory with a contribution to sustain the project Mr. P dedicated his life, Clearview Golf Course, you can make a tax-deducible gift payable to the Legacy Foundation Clearview Golf Club, P. O. Box 30196, East Canton, OH 44730. The DISH staff offers it sincere condolences to the family. The world will miss the presence of such a wonderful human being, but his spirit will remain among us as an example of how a powerful dream can touch people and help change the world.

 

Email www.summitdaily.com ...Colo. man accused of dragging woman by hair at bar -- A white man accused of dragging a black woman out of a Colorado bar by her hair has been charged with a bias-motivated crime. The Summit County district attorney filed assault and bias-motivated crime charges Wednesday (12-09-09) against 37-year-old Dustin Meadows. Prosecutors say Meadows used a racial epithet against the woman, as well as other obscenities, during an argument at a bar in Summit Cove. According to the Summit County sheriff's office, the argument began after Meadows spilled his beer on the woman while he was dancing. According to the report, the woman turned to him and said "What, no apology?" The sheriff's office says the woman was missing hair on the right side of her hair. Meadows is free on bail.

 

Email jocelynlamont@thehandstand.org ...Happy and Successful New Year to you and your husband Dot. Although I live so far outside of your world I value every edition of your magazine for the knowledge of America I learn from you. Congratulations on the 12th year and never fear the 13th; for as the Red Indians, of tribe unknown to me, say: the sun has thirteen rays! So for sunlight all the year to you! Best regards from Jocelyn (Now going into the 9th year of www.thehandstand.org.)