The DISH

Unbossed and unbought news and information you can use

Vol. 12 Issue 8…Dedicated to the Dialogue on Race…February 22, 2009

 

 

Venue for an Artist

Rosa Sat - A Song for Barack Obama

By Amy Dixon-Kolar



Chorus:

Rosa sat so Martin could walk

Martin walked so Barack could run

Barack ran, he ran and he won

So that all our children could fly


Thousands of people that November night

All of us here who have fought the long fight

Knowing as one we're creating a new nation

Join together in celebration

 

Chorus


Mother and daughter listenin' to the news

Momma breaks down cryin', little girl is confused

Honey we worked so hard to get to this place

Daughter puts a loving hand on momma's face

 

Chorus


Mr. Obama all eyes turn to you

Share with the country what you're gonna do

Wars and foreclosures surround us this year

But Yes We Can rise above our fears

 

Chorus (2x)



About Me: Amy Dixon-Kolar is a seasoned singer-songwriter whose entrancing music and lyrics, honest, distinctive vocals and fluid guitar stylings bring a new perspective to the everyday. Her take on life comes from her years as a teacher, interpreter, mom, social activist and performer. Amy performs mostly acoustic folk music - original, traditional, contemporary and Celtic. You can find out more about Amy, her new CD "Now It's Time," the story behind "Rosa Sat," and where she'll be performing at http://amydixonkolar.com. To hear the song and see the wonderful video created to accompany this song, click on http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l-0NvkuPHZI.



 




Kudos! Kudos!

On What Holder Said

By Dot



February, the shortest month of the year, is Black History Month. During this month, we are apt to hear people say things not mentioned the other eleven months of the year.


On Wednesday in a speech to Justice Department employees marking Black History Month, US Attorney General Eric Holder, the nation's first black AG, said, "Though this nation has proudly thought of itself as an ethnic melting pot, in things racial we have always been and I believe continue to be, in too many ways, essentially a nation of cowards." As an example, he argued that many Americans are still segregated inside what he called "race-protected cocoons." He said, "Saturdays and Sundays, America in the year 2009 does not in some ways differ significantly from the country that existed almost 50 years ago. This is truly sad."

 

Holder believes, and I concur, "Race is an issue we have never been at ease with and, given our nation's history, this is in some ways understandable. If we are to make progress in this area, we must feel comfortable enough with one another and tolerant enough of each other to have frank conversations about the racial matters that continue to divide us."

 

Holder urged Justice Department employees and all Americans to use Black History Month as a chance for honest discussions of racial matters, including issues of health care, education and economic disparities. Kudos! Kudos! It is about time some high-ranking official acknowledged the elephant in the room.

 




Bit of History

Claudette Colvin: Before Rosa Sat



"It was Sojourner Truth pushing me back down on the seat, saying 'Girl, you can't get up,' and Harriet Tubman, too. All of those people were in the back of my mind."



An Alabama native, Claudette Colvin was born September 5, 1939 to a low income family; her father mowed lawns and her mother was a maid. Colvin grew up in King Hill, the poorest section of Montgomery. Colvin attended Booker T. Washington High School in Montgomery. To get to and from the black high school, Colvin relied on Montgomery's public bus system.


On March 2, 1955, Colvin boarded a Capital Heights bus, taking the first available seat about two rows from the emergency exit. Shortly after she and three other black women were seated, four white hobos boarded the bus. As was the custom and law at the time, the bus driver, Robert W. Cleere, ordered the black women to relinquish their seats to the white hobos. Colvin repeatedly refused to relinquish her seat. The police was called. Colvin was handcuffed, arrested and forcibly removed from the bus.


The teenager was thrown into a jail cell until her parents posted bail. She was charged with disorderly conduct, violating the segregation ordinance and assault and battery, presumably for resisting arrest. At her trial, Annie Price, a witness to the incident, testified there was no assault. Ultimately, Colvin was sentenced to probation for violating the segregation ordinance.

 

Ironically, no boycott of the segregated bus system resulted from Colvin's experience, even though she was a member of the National Association of Colored People's Youth Council. Apparently, the organization's leadership deemed her unsuitable to be the face of the movement. A number of justifications have been cited by historians, including her low income background, skin color and the out-of-wedlock pregnancy, which resulted in her expulsion from high school.

 

On December 1, 1955, a light-skinned, mature and respected member of the black middle class, Rosa Parks boarded the same bus, refused to give up her seat and was arrested. Her defiance ignited the Montgomery Bus Boycott, which lasted for more than a year, claiming a place in history as the Mother of the Modern Civil Rights Movement.


However, Parks' arrest did not form the basis of the legal challenge to the public transportation segregation ordinance. The NAACP attorneys approached four other black women who had been mistreated. Aurelia Browder, Susie McDonald, Claudette Colvin and Mary Louise Smith became plaintiffs in the legal challenge to Montgomery's segregated public transportation system. On February 1, 1956, the case known as Browder V. Gayle was filed in US District Court. It specifically questioned whether the segregation ordinance violated the Fourteenth Amendment's equal protection clause. On June 19, 1956, a three-judge panel ruled in favor of the plaintiffs. The lower court's ruling was affirmed in December of that year by the US Supreme Court.


While she is not considered the Mother of the Modern Civil Rights Movement and her role is regulated to a footnote in black history, Colvin has said, "I feel proud of what I did. I do feel like what I did was a spark and it caught on... I'm not disappointed. Let the people know Rosa Parks was the right person for the boycott. But also let them know that the attorneys took four other women to the Supreme Court to challenge the law that led to the end of segregation."


In 2004, Colvin retired from the Catholic nursing home, where she had worked for 35 years as a nurse's assistant. Colvin's civil disobedience is the subject of storyteller-actress Awele Makeba's one-woman drama, Rage Is Not A 1-Day Thing! Makeba tells the true story of the 1955-56 Montgomery bus boycott through the eyes of Colvin following her arrest for refusing to give up her bus seat to a white person. In February, Phillip Hoose published his book, Claudette Colvin: Twice Toward Justice, which is based on interviews with the grandmother of five who currently resides in New York. (Source: http://en.wikipedia.org, www.montgomeryboycott.com/bio_colvin.htm and www.core-online.org)






Hood Notes

The Census: How We Count and Why?

By John Burl Smith



Stepping aside as Secretary of Commerce nominee, US Sen. Judd Gregg highlighted the controversy involving how we will count and why during the 2010 Census. Advocacy groups, black activists and Democrats say the Census Bureau's practice of counting prisoners as residents of the area where they are incarcerated proves the 3/5 Compromise in the US Constitution is still active. They believe that in removing responsibility for the census from Commerce, the White House is trying to "guard against the undercount." Ignored by the national media, previous undercounts have resulted in lost political clout and revenue for blacks and poor urban dwellers.


Low census counts of blacks and the poor favor rural whites. US Rep. Joe E. Serrano, D-Bronx, New York in 2006 attached language to an appropriations bill directing the Census Bureau to study counting incarcerated persons where they lived before being jailed. Serrano challenged the Census Bureau's 226-year-old practice, because prisoners are having an unprecedented impact on political representation, allocation of funds and other resources today.

 

Counting incarcerated persons as residents of the places where they are imprisoned rather than as residents of where they call home does more than impact federal and state funds linked to population data; it inflates population counts in areas where prisons are located; it also boosts political clout at the expense of urban communities and rural regions without prisons. Prisons, public and private, are mostly located in rural areas.

 

Exploding prison populations (over 2.5 million) have enabled unscrupulous politicians to create phantom districts that contain more inmates than actual constituents. This hijacks political power in that such bogus districts can elect politicians with shockingly small numbers of free voters. Once in office, they reward friends, punish enemies, block prison reform, support stiffer drug laws and wield as much power as legislators that represent districts with free constituents.

 

Prison-based gerrymandering exploits prison inmates, who are stripped of the right to vote in all but two states. In most cases, inmates benefit prison towns hundreds of miles from where they live. Clearly, prison-based gerrymandering affects voting, illegally inflates legislative districts in violation of federal law and the one person, one vote principle. This has significant civil rights implications, since so many inmates are black. The NAACP has joined others in demanding a change in the Census Bureau's counting procedure.

 

Examples of this problem abound, for instance in Anamosa, Iowa, a city councilman was elected by just two votes (both write ins) in 2006. According to the Census, Anamosa's Ward 2 had almost 1,400 residents of which 1,300 are inmates in the Anamosa State Penitentiary. Minus inmates, Ward 2 has fewer than 60 residents.


Another case is Franklin County, a bucolic getaway in up-state New York on the border with Canadian. An overwhelmingly white county of 51,000, more than 5,000 are prisoners and of that 3,600 are blacks and Latinos from New York City. Not only does the influx of big-city convicts bring anti-poverty funds to the little towns, they inflate legislative district populations, even though convicted felons cannot vote. As a result, a state senate district which includes Franklin County has only 287,000 free individuals; while in Queens, a state senator represents 318,000 free persons, giving Franklin County a bigger voice than South Jamaica.

 

Every time New York City sends a convicted criminal to an upstate prison, it also gives up money and power. A 2002 study of New York State's prison system by the Prison Policy Initiative (PPI) documented how prison operators and the politically savvy divert funds and shift power away from minority urban areas to the less-populated, mostly white upstate region.

 

New York State has several senate districts that straddle statistical borders that may eventually prompt a court challenge. When prisoners are subtracted from five of New York's state Senate districts and are compared to the most populous districts in the state, the disparities are larger than federal law allows.


Texas is classic. According to Rep. Warren Chisum, R-Pampa, "The bottom line is, the more people you get, the more money you get." His is the largest district in Texas with 19 counties and it has over 4,000 prisoners from Houston, which is about 600 miles away. "A lot of federal funds, as well as state funds are divided based on population, and it's important to rural areas that we have these people up here in jail," Chisum said.


Texas has roughly 165,000 federal and state prisoners. It has 2 House districts with 12 percent of their population behind bars; though prisoners lack voting rights, they are considered among the 139,000 residents when legislative districts are carved out. Texas has 10 counties where more than 20 percent of the populations are prisoners. Prison reform advocates say this is the key to rural power, prisoners that hail disproportionately from urban areas.

 

Many constitutional scholars express a view that compares the way prisoners are counted with the 3/5 Compromise, "The 3/5 Clause in the Constitution counted slaves as three-fifths of a white person and assure Southern states extra representation in Congress, as well as electoral votes. Within states, voters living in the 'slave belts' had much more political clout than those in districts free of slaves. U.S. congressional district maps within slave states were also skewed to favor slaveholding regions. Although Virginia's Richmond district had less than half the population of the Wheeling district, each was represented by one congressman. Slaves, of course, made up the difference."

 

Changes in how we count and why is the key to why Sen. Judd Gregg was so furious with the Obama administration over the Census Bureau move. The New York Times, the National Conference of Mayors, inmate re-entry service providers, former Director of the Census Bureau Kenneth Prewitt, the Decennial Census Committee and the Census African American Advisory Committee all have endorsed changing how the Census Bureau counts prisoners. (Sources: www.brennancenter.org, www.prisonersofthecensus.org, http://theboard.blogs.nytimes.com)





 

Bailing Out the 3/5 Compromise

By John Burl Smith



The terms "revenue stream" or "funding formula" may not be familiar but they have profound impacts on the lives of all Americans. Cutting across socio-economic and political lines, they function like a double-edged sword, favoring some while disadvantaging others. Economic in nature, their source is political and their economic impact is far reaching. Federal government efforts to bail out banks, save the automobile industry, as well as the stimulus bill illustrate clearly the significance of these terms.

 

The US Constitution is the law of the land.  Among its many roles and responsibilities, it gives Congress control of the nation's purse strings. Congress levies all taxes, determines how they are collected, their uses and disbursal. The process of dispersing taxes is done through what are called "revenue streams" or "funding formulas." This means all funds disbursed, whether spent by the federal government or sent to states and local communities have strings attached. These strings specify the "revenue stream" or "funding formula" by spelling out how the funds are to be used and/or divvied up.

 

The bank bailout, automobile industry rescue package and stimulus bill are designated "revenue streams" or "funding formulas" created by Congress to disburse tax dollars. Unfortunately, all of these corporations and businesses are run by white people who have tolerated discrimination against slave descendants. Consequently, tax dollars from black people are being used to prop up companies that practice discrimination. Neither Congress nor the White House added language prohibiting discrimination by industries notorious for keeping blacks out of upper management. It is the height of folly to assume these corporate giants will suddenly stop discriminating against blacks because a black president is giving them money.

 

Handing out trillions of tax dollars prompts slave descendants to ask, what about black people? How do they fit into this bailout picture? At the bottom or in the backwash of these "revenue streams," we are residuals in these "funding formulas." An afterthought, black people are still covered by the 3/5 Compromise which siphons off our tax dollars to benefit whites, a process that locks their children into the boardrooms and black children in the outhouse.


These new "revenue streams" or "funding formulas" are no different from those developed at the end of the Civil War. Slaves and their descendants were not a part of any federal funding consideration and when their descendants began paying taxes, discrimination was the law of the land. Even in the North, blacks were second class citizens and were treated disparately. Not only were state governments segregated but the federal government was segregated also. It was not until Franklin D. Roosevelt issued an executive order to the Works Progress Administration (WPA) during the "New Deal" that mandated "hiring be done without regard to race," addressing discrimination for the first time.


Nevertheless, the 3/5 Compromise (Plessy v Ferguson) continued to determine not only social aspects of slave descendants' lives but after Brown v Board of Education (1954) it kept an iron grip, strangling blacks' economic mobility. Legally ending segregation, Brown v Board broke down many physical barriers, but the economic infrastructure of discrimination was never dismantled. Again, the "revenue streams" and "funding formulas" remained in place, and the people who enforced segregation remained in charge. Artificial justifications such as mental capacity, education, a poor work ethic and cultural mixing serviced as barriers to keep blacks down. Whites controlled federal funds designed for the black community by creating boards and commissions that diverted tax revenue to the suburbs.


Although Barack Obama has been elected President, nothing is being said about changing the 3/5 Compromise or old segregation "revenue streams" and "funding formulas" that benefited whites by keeping black communities poor. For instance, Wall Street is the most segregated work place in America and it makes decisions about investments that discriminate against black communities daily. Also, with blacks being the last hired and the first fired, layoffs and downsizing have reduced blacks on Wall Street, particularly black men, back to pre-1990s levels. Even before the economic downturn, George W. Bush had turned back the clock on affirmative action, signaling discrimination against blacks was back en vogue. Now with bailouts, taxes from blacks are financing companies that continue to discriminate against slave descendants.


For instance, black companies doing infrastructure work, like rebuilding sewer and drainage systems, need access because many of these contracts are let through a "good old boy" network. Dredging and levee contracts are let in the same fashion, black companies are locked out of bids based on insider tips and family associations. Without affirmation action to open up the bidding process, black companies cannot get a foot in the door.


Moreover, banks employ some of the most egregious discriminatory practices and are getting trillions from taxpayer. Are minority banks receiving bank bailout funds? Minority banks have been treated disparately as depositories for federal dollars and squeezed out of the credit market. Now is the time for Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner to correct such obvious discrimination. He must issue an order reaffirming the federal government's commitment to affirmative action and take positive steps to make up for decades of the federal government's discrimination against slave descendants. There should be a determined effort to bring blacks up at least to the level of white women, who profited most from affirmative action.

 

Black Americans have lost more ground under the current downturn than any other group. Far behind already because of the 3/5 Compromise, blacks need a "revenue stream" or "funding formula" that addresses historical systemic discrimination, if they are ever to catch up. It is time to drop the old cliché "We have come a long way but we still have a long way to go." WHY!! Dot M. Smith's research has proven the consistent gap between black and white income is the result of discrimination, so while the federal government is reinventing the economy, now is the time to build an economy with enforceable laws against racial discrimination. Obviously, once the trillions of dollars now being spent are gone, if blacks are not included now, there will be nothing left in the treasury to address disparities between blacks and whites.







Blah! Blah!

On New York Post Carton

Open Letter to NY Post Editor Written By John Legend



I'm trying to understand what possible motivation you may have had for publishing that vile cartoon depicting the shooting of the chimpanzee that went crazy. I guess you thought it would be funny to suggest that whoever was responsible for writing the Economic Recovery legislation must have the intelligence and judgment of a deranged, violent chimpanzee, and should be shot to protect the larger community. Really?  Did it occur to you that this suggestion would imply a connection between President Barack Obama and the deranged chimpanzee? Did it occur to you that our President has been receiving death threats since early in his candidacy? Did it occur to you that blacks have historically been compared to various apes as a way of racist insult and mockery? Did you intend to invoke these painful themes when you printed the cartoon?

 

If that's not what you intended, then it was stupid and willfully ignorant of you not to connect these easily connectable dots.  If it is what you intended, then you obviously wanted to be grossly provocative, racist and offensive to the sensibilities of most reasonable Americans.  Either way, you should not have printed this cartoon, and the fact that you did is truly reprehensible. I can't imagine what possible justification you have for this. I've read your lame statement in response to the outrage you provoked.

 

Shame on you for dodging the real issue and then using the letter as an opportunity to attack Rev. Sharpton. This is not about Rev. Sharpton. It's about the cartoon being blatantly racist and offensive.

 

I believe in freedom of speech, and you have every right to print what you want. But freedom of speech still comes with responsibilities and consequences.

 

You are responsible for printing this cartoon, and I hope you experience some real consequences for it. I'm personally boycotting your paper and won't do any interviews with any of your reporters, and I encourage all of my colleagues in the entertainment business to do so as well. I implore your advertisers to seriously reconsider their business relationships with you as well.

 

You should print an apology in your paper acknowledging that this cartoon was ignorant, offensive and racist and should not have been printed.


I'm well aware of our country's history of racism and violence, but I truly believe we are better than this filth. As we attempt to rise above our difficult past and look toward a better future, we don't need the New York Post to resurrect the images of Jim Crow to deride the new administration and put black folks in our place. Please feel free to criticize and honestly evaluate our new President, but do so without the incendiary images and rhetoric. (Source: www.johnlegend.com/us/blogs)





Mailbox: E-Mails, Faxes and Phone Calls



Email www.mercurynews.com/ Stanford filmmaker fights for aging survivors of nation's worst race riot...By Lisa M. Krieger...Stanford alumni Reggie Turner and Charles Ogletree thought they knew American history. Political activists and scholars, they studied at the nation's top law schools, launched successful legal careers and joined America's black aristocracy. But nowhere in their textbooks were they told about the worst racial violence in the nation's history. Fixing years of neglect, Turner and 106-year-old Otis Clark will speak at Stanford after the screening of Turner's new film "Before They Die," featuring the survivors of the 1921 Tulsa, Okla., race riot that killed up to 300 people, left 10,000 homeless, destroyed 35 blocks of a prosperous black business community -- and then was virtually erased from history.

 

Email www.gazette-mail.com Melting Pot...Today, the US Census Bureau says, America's population remains 66 percent white - but white dominance is fading rapidly, soon to vanish forever. As early as 2040, traditional whites, with lower birth rates, will become a minority as the country swells with more-fertile Hispanics, Asians, blacks, Pacific Islanders, American Indians and other minorities. At that point, the Census Bureau predicts, America will transform into a 'majority minority' nation. "No other country has experienced such rapid racial and ethnic change," Mark Mather of the Population Reference Bureau says. Already, whites are a minority in one-tenth of US counties, the Census Bureau reports. For example, they're only 19 percent of the population in Florida's Miami-Dade County - and just 29 percent in California's Los Angeles County - and only 37 percent in the Texas County that includes Houston. Starr County, Texas, on the Mexican border, is an astounding 98 percent minority (making the minority the majority).

 

Email www.chicagosuntimes.com...Racial gerrymandering, backed by Dems, hurts blacks...Obama's election clearly confirms that majority-white America is comfortable with a president of African descent. Why only one black in the Senate? There are 39 African-American members of the US Congress, not including non-voting delegates in places such as the Virgin Islands and the District of Columbia. That's about 9 percent of Congress, for a minority group comprising 12 percent of the US population. The real cause of this paucity of blacks in Congress is not racism, but racial gerrymandering, in which black voters are concentrated in congressional districts where blacks predominate, instead of designing districts to follow more natural geographical and institutional boundaries. Race-based gerrymandering - supported by national Democrats - has created 39 congressional districts that are predominantly (more than 25 percent) African-American. In fact, 25 of the 39 districts where blacks now have congressional seats have outright black majority populations. The axiom behind this gerrymandering is that on 'safe,' predominantly black districts could guarantee the election of blacks to Congress, because of protracted racism among white and Hispanic voters. While such manipulation of voting district boundaries is ostensibly intended to favor blacks politically, it actually has the opposite effect.