The DISH

Unbossed and unbought news and information you can use

Vol. 12 Issue 47…Dedicated to the Dialogue on Race…November 22, 2009

 

 

Intuit's Vibe

"Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee"

Songwriters: Sainte-Marie, Buffy

Performed by Indigo Girls



Indian legislation on the desk of a do-right Congressman

Now, he don't know much about the issue

So he picks up the phone

And he asks advice from the

Senator out in Indian country

A darling of the energy companies who are ripping off what's left of the reservations.



I learned a safety rule

I don't know who to thank

Don't stand between the reservation and the corporate bank

They send in federal tanks

It isn't nice, but it's reality



Bury my heart at Wounded Knee

Deep in the Earth

Cover me with pretty lies

Bury my heart at Wounded Knee. Huh.



They got these energy companies that want the land

And they've got churches by the dozen who want to guide our hands

And sign Mother Earth over to pollution, war and greed

Get rich... get rich quick.



We got the federal marshals

We got the covert spies

We got the liars by the fire

We got the FBIs

They lie in court and get nailed and still Peltier goes off to jail



My girlfriend Annie Mae talked about uranium

Her head was filled with bullets and her body dumped

The FBI cut off her hands and told us she'd died of exposure



We had the Goldrush Wars

Aw, didn't we learn to crawl and still our history gets written in a liar's scrawl

They tell 'ya "Honey, you can still be an Indian d-d-down at the 'Y' on Saturday nights"



Bury my heart at Wounded Knee

Deep in the Earth

Cover me with pretty lies

Bury my heart at Wounded Knee. Huh!





Bit of History

Leonard Peltier


"The government, under pretext of security and progress, liberated us from our land, resources, culture, dignity and future. They violated every treaty they ever made with us. I use the word "liberated" loosely and sarcastically, in the same vein that I view the use of the words "collateral damage" when they kill innocent men, women and children. They describe people defending their homelands as terrorists, savages and hostiles . . . My words reach out to the non-Indian: Look now before it is too late--see what is being done to others in your name and see what destruction you sanction when you say nothing. --Leonard Peltier, Annual Message January 2004



Born on September 12, 1944, in Grand Forks, North Dakota, Leonard Peltier is the son of Leo Peltier and Alvina Robideau. Peltier is of Anishinabe-Lakota ancestry. He spent his early years living with his grandparents on the Turtle Mountain Indian Reservation.


Around age 14, Peltier attended meetings on the reservation with his father at which tribal members discussed the termination of Turtle Mountain under a US government policy to "relocate" Indians off their lands and into cities. Peltier would later recall the roots of his political activism. Buried deep in the rank racism and brutal poverty he experienced every day as an Indian child growing up on the Turtle Mountain Chippewa and Fort Totten Sioux reservations in North Dakota, his activism began in response to his female cousin's emotional, tear-filled quandary. "Where are our warriors? Why don't they stand up and fight for their starving people?" Sending chills down his spine, her questions ignited a lifelong quest.

 

According to Peltier, "It was like a revelation to me--that there was actually something worthwhile you could do with your life, something more important than living your own selfish little life day by day. Yes, there was something more important than your poor miserable self: your People. You could actually stand up and fight for them... and as I would come to see in later years, all Indian people, all Indigenous People, all human beings of good heart. I vowed right then and there that I would become a warrior and that I'd always work to help my people. It's a vow I've done my best to keep."

 

Since then, Peltier has been standing up for his people. He joined the protest for fishing rights in the Northwest. He participated in the 1970 peaceful takeover of abandoned Fort Lawton, outside Seattle, Washington. Because this facility was on "surplus" federal land to which the Indians had first right under the law, Peltier refused to leave even when faced with government machine guns and flamethrowers. Along with other protestors, he was taken into custody and beaten. Ultimately, the Indian's challenge was successful. Today, Fort Lawton is an Indian cultural center.

 

After Fort Lawton, Peltier traveled the country. He joined the American Indian Movement (AIM). In 1972, Peltier joined the Trail of Broken Treaties march to Washington, DC to present a 20-point proposal for improving US-Indians relations in time for the presidential election. The march ended with the occupation of the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA), where the protesters had gone demanding better lodging for their leaders. The situation was defused as the government eventually provided vehicles and an early-morning police escort out of town plus under-the-table money ($66,000) to pay the Indians' return travel expenses. Some of the Elders even received first-class tickets home.

 

After the Trail of Broken Treaties, AIM was classified "an extremist organization" by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and its leaders became targets of the FBI's Counter Insurgency Program (COINTELPRO). A few weeks after his return from Washington, DC, in November 1972, Peltier was falsely accused of the attempted murder of a Milwaukee, Wisconsin police officer. Peltier spent five months in jail before Milwaukee AIM could raise his bail, during which time the action at Wounded Knee had commenced. Peltier went underground soon after he was released in April 1973. On August 9, 1974, due to Peltier's failure to appear for trial in Milwaukee, a formal warrant was issued for his arrest. He was later acquitted of those charges.

 

Peltier continued to travel and be involved in political activities including the 1974 takeover by the Menominee Warrior Society of an unused abbey of the Alexian Brothers Novitiate in Gresham, the 1975 eight-day takeover of the Fairchild Corporation electronics plant, where underpaid Navajo women employees had lost their jobs for trying to unionize, and the June 26, 1975 shoot-out on the Pine Ridge Reservation, which resulted in Peltier's conviction for the deaths of two FBI agents. Peltier has been imprisoned for more than 30 years.

 

Incarceration has not completely ceased his efforts to aid his people. As presidential candidate for the Peace and Freedom Party in 2004, Peltier won ballot status in the state of California, where he received 27,607 votes or approximately 0.2%. In 2009, Peltier was severely beaten following his transfer from US Penitentiary at Lewisburg to the United States Penitentiary at Canaan by fellow inmates. He was sent back to Lewisburg after the assault.

 

A popular culture icon, Peltier has been the subject of countless newspaper articles, songs, books and films, including Michale Apted's documentary Incident at Oglala: The Leonard Peltier Story (1992). A number of organizations worldwide, including Amnesty International has formally requested his release, calling him a "political prisoner." In 1999, Peltier published his autobiography My Life is my Sun Dance. He is also an accomplished artist. (Sources: www.whoisleonardpeltier.info/activist.htm, http://en.wikipedia.org and www.huffingtonpost.com)





Obama Meets With Native Americans

By John Burl Smith



President Barack Obama opened the first White House Tribal National Conference on November, 5, 2009 in Washington D. C. with this perspective, "We seek to build on and strengthen our nation-to-nation relationship, ensuring that tribal communities have a meaningful voice in our national policy debate as we confront the challenges facing all Americans." The first meeting since Pres. Bill Clinton hosted Native leaders 15 years ago, though called a White House event, the confab was down-graded to and staged in the Interior Department.

 

Pres. Obama delivered opening and closing remarks and hosted one session. He was followed by six cabinet secretaries and several top administration officials in breakout sessions. Having major responsibility for overseeing Indian affairs, Interior Secretary Ken Salazar, after acknowledging tribal stories have been "swept under the rug in many ways," echoed Obama's promise to "Uphold a nation-to-nation relationship with the tribes and open a 'new chapter of change.' We won't be able to wave a magic wand and resolve all the issues, but it is a great foundation for all the work that lies ahead.'

 

However, all cabinet members were not as receptive, according to Janice Rowe-Kurat, chairperson of the Iowa Tribe of Oklahoma, Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius gave these heads of nations who are "supposed to be on the same level as Mr. Obama" only 15 minutes and didn't take any questions from any tribal leaders"


Mr. Obama was big on symbolism, signing a memorandum asking his Cabinet secretaries to outline plans to improve relations with tribal nations within 90 days --a follow up on a Clinton executive order that has languished. He showcased Native American appointees, including Interior Assistant Secretary for Indian Affairs Larry Echo Hawk, White House Senior Policy Adviser for Native American Affairs Kim Teehee, White House Associate Director of Intergovernmental Affairs Jodi Gillette, and Indian Health Service Director Yvette Roubideaux. Also, he proclaimed "November 2009 National Native American Heritage Month and called on all Americans to commemorate this month with appropriate programs and activities, and called on the nation to celebrate November 27, 2009, as Native American Heritage Day."


Touting the $170 million for Indian education and the $277 million for Indian school construction in the stimulus Recovery Act, Mr. Obama promised to help improve health care, job training and educational opportunities, noting that Native Americans have among the highest dropout rates of any demographic group in the country.

 

More than government handouts, which created the cycle of poverty, estrangement, hopelessness, ill-health, deprivation and desperation on reservations that characterize their existence, Native Americans have endured centuries of symbolism. They look for substance now. Most tribal members believe if Mr. Obama really wants to help, he would aggressively pursue settling Cobell v. Kempthorne by issuing an executive order.


A lawsuit filed by Elouise Cobell that has dragged on over 12-years, the origins of which date back to 1887, when the government divided up millions of acres of Indian reservation land, parceled it out to individual Native Americans, but put the lots into trusts controlled by the Interior Department. While claiming this land scheme would help Native Americans become self-sufficient, the government leased the land to oil, gas and other companies. Lawyers for the Native Americans contend that over the years the government should have paid Native Americans billions of dollars in royalties. Cobell, a leader of the Blackfeet tribe in northwest Montana, filed the class-action lawsuit in 1996 based on the 1887 suit. She is seeking to force the Interior Department to account for billions of dollars in royalties that are owed Native people from land held in trust by the government. Several states are currently fighting the government over royalties.


U.S. District Judge James Robertson in a recent decision in Cobell v. Kempthorne gave a 165-page opinion. "It would be nearly impossible to figure out the difference between what the government collected from the leases and what it then paid out to Native Americans over the years. The government has trouble accounting for the money. Many records are missing. Some are kept in different forms. Others were destroyed. And Congress did not allocate the money necessary to perform an audit that might ultimately determine what happened to the funds. The government's own data suggested a potential gap of about $3 billion."


Finally, Robertson ruled that the U.S. government did mismanage royalties collected from gas and oil companies that drilled on Native American lands but would only award $455 million -- far less than the $47 billion plaintiffs sought. Here again, it is clear prejudice against Native Americans is reflected in the government's unwillingness to do what was necessary to establish how much is actually owed the plaintiffs. Elouise Cobell said she is "disappointed" by the ruling and is weighing whether to appeal.


Although far short of what they are owed, the Obama administration is trying to avoid paying this meager sum. This is similar to the settlement with Black farmers, where the Agriculture Department is trying to renege on that settlement. If Pres. Obama was not "speaking with a forked tongue," he would settle this suit and make good on promises made this week, which would truly open a new chapter is US and Native people's relationship. (Sources: www.washingtonpost.com, http://winnememwintu.blogspot.com, http://narcosphere.narconews.com,and www.greatfallstribune.com)





News You Use

Differing Views on Native American Confab



Native Americans differed widely and expressed little trust in President Obama's promises made to Native American Tribal leaders. The DISH felt it was important that their thoughts, which were posted at http://narcosphere.narconews.com, be shared with the world.


-"Native Americans Against Obama came about for two reasons. The first is Mr. Obama's total lack of knowledge concerning how an American president should respond to us as a global issue. The second reason is Mr. Obama made it a point not to attend a meeting with the National Congress Of American Indians held in Reno, Nevada during the primary and not standing behind his word to meet with all Native American leaders." --- www.rezkast.com


-"The little bits and pieces I heard was a lot of 'we need to do better.' Well NO sh-t !!!  That's what we've been telling you for years." --Tim Wozny


-"Oh no, we'll not forget - we'll not forget you stored deadly radioactive waste on our reservations - we'll not forget to mine uranium on your lands then leave the tailings there to poison your people forever - we'll not forget - oh no we won't." --Molly Johnson


-"Well I wasn't surprised that Leonard Peltier's name didn't come up, but because of the efforts of those who could make it, our supporters 'were seen' and 'heard' by Obama when he went by. That fiasco is over now and we still have work to do; we just have to think of what to do next." ---Michael Oneroad, Sisseton/Wahpeton Oyate


-"After listening on MyTribeTV I see the same old carrots dangling before the cart. When there is real action on the issues constantly facing Indian Country I might feel more encouraged. Lisa Jackson's double speak is a slap in the face to those in the Silver Valley and Bunker Hill Superfund site, including the CDAs and Spokanes. I thank all who stood vigil for Leonard." --Gayle Eversole, Choctaw


-"Wow, I thought it was me just being cynical, so glad all of you shared your thoughts. I am really disappointed that no NON federally recognized tribes were asked to join, not even send in suggestions - talk about trying to pit people against one another. These are Native Nations too, whether they have the federal stamp of approval or not." --Corine Fairbanks


"I also agree with Corine, I know Chief Billy Tayac of the Piscataway people was not there. And it is the lands of his people that the White House, the federal triangle and DC sits upon. I never agreed or supported the government maintaining our pedigree's as if we were animals or property. Who gave the government the right to determine who is and isn't Native."


--"Obama assumes that we all want to live the American Dream (nightmare), and that we are all Americans, but that presumption is without a basis in fact. The 1924 American Indian Citizenship Act was imposed upon us; it was a stamp that has denied us a voice and vote in the United Nations and to further assimilate our people into the system. This summit is just another in a long series of mechanisms to bring our people into conformity with the US. If Obama is serious, then free Peltier, relinquish control of the Black Hills, empower the traditional Hopi and Dine' to defend their lands, and remove the soldiers of the state from the border reservations. If that happens, then maybe I might take him a little more serious as an ally than as a threat to the Sovereignty of the First Nations....!"--Ben Carnes, Choctaw


--"Just a few thoughts about the November 5th meeting of Pres. Obama with one tribal government representative of the 564 recognized tribes -- what was our tribal message? What theme was to be cast upon the Executive waters by a Shoshone-Bannock tribal leader? Is it health care, education, economic development, executive policy, legal jurisdiction or sovereignty issues to name a few? No, it was the same ole song and dance to fund for specific projects. To hell with the issues of contamination of mother earth -- water, air, fish and wildlife -- by the Simplot company in Southeast Idaho. To hell with the message and demand for immediate correction of the EPA, whose inactions allow this travesty to continue, and who has a trust responsibility to our Tribe via the Ft. Bridger treaty of 1868! Can we expect Obama to straighten out the EPA. I too am saddened and surprised that not one tribal leader stood and asked the President to release our brother Leonard Peltier. Can we do better and speak not as one arrow separately but as many arrows bound together and strengthened by truth and honor?" ~Sherwin Racehorse.

 

--"The national myth of a 'race of savages' on 'empty lands.'   We must all uncover the counter-narratives (our narratives) from the imperial record that distort reality, our history, past, present and future. Uncovering the tragic and sexually violent history of conquest while also uncovering the true strength and power of both African Americans and indigenous peoples to hope, and continue to live in the face of such violent injustice. We are still here, and will keep fighting until all the earth and all the people are free completely." --Michelle Cook, Navajo


To read other comments by Native Americans on President Obama's confab with tribal leaders, visit http://narcosphere.narconews.com.





Hood Notes

More Money to Collect...Unpaid Oil Royalties

By John Burl Smith



Due to prejudice and discrimination against Native Americans, most other Americans view the historic problem "Indians" have had with the Department of the Interior as related to justifiable exploitation of a "race of savages on empty lands" who have no idea of its value. Consequently, a benevolent government stepped in to insure development of resources for their benefit. Such individuals do not understand that the Department of the Interior has always operated for the benefit of businesses like oil, gas, mining and lumber companies to name a few. However, when government agencies collude with business in this manner, not only do individuals and groups, like Native Americans, but states as well, lose revenues.

 

The Project on Government Oversight (POGO) used a previous report developed from a Congressional hearing held by US Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-NY), which cited the Department of the Interior's failure to collect unpaid oil royalties. POGO released two reports that showed over the period 1960 to 1993, oil companies used posted prices to undervalue oil royalties. After several years of prodding, the Department of the Interior announced it would attempt to collect a mere $440 million in unpaid royalties from oil companies operating on federal leases only in California. Attempting to collect lost revenues due California is a good first step for the Department of the Interior, but the $440 million is just a drop in the bucket of the total amount of unpaid royalties owed the American public by oil companies. This initial effort to collect unpaid royalties owed California since 1978 still leaves at least $856 million and as much as $1.5 billion owed dating back to 1960.

 

More astonishingly, royalties the federal government collects from oil production in California represent just a small portion of the total amount of royalties the federal government collects annually -- in fact, from 1985 to 1995, the Department of the Interior collected 90% of its oil royalties from federal land outside of California. Therefore, the State of California is not unique. Since 1985, oil companies have used the same posted price market practice to undervalue oil royalties throughout the United States. POGO has gathered substantial evidence indicating undervaluation from 13 states, 3 Native American Nations, and numerous private citizens. We have also found that many states are way ahead of the federal government in collecting these unpaid royalties. In fact, the Department of the Interior has a long history of avoiding this issue.


According to a senior Department of the Interior official, oil companies' undervaluation of crude oil produced East of the Rockies led to the underpayment of royalties by 3% to 10% from 1985 to 1995. Assuredly, this testimony and Department of the Interior figures show that, outside of California, oil companies owe the American public between $400 million and $1.3 billion in unpaid oil royalties since 1985. This estimate excludes potential interest and penalties. According to Assistant Secretary of the Interior Robert Armstrong (1993-98), the Department of the Interior rarely "makes certain the American public gets what is due."


Perhaps the most glaring evidence is the numerous admissions by oil companies that they, in fact, undervalued oil for years. Both Phillips and Arco have publicly admitted to undervaluing oil, while the admissions of several other companies are conveniently sealed by the courts in California. This evidence proves that oil company pricing policies benefit companies at the taxpayers' expense.


State governments clearly have taken the initiative on collecting unpaid oil royalties. In 1992, six oil companies settled with the State of California for $350 million in unpaid oil royalties and interest. Louisiana, New Mexico, and Texas each have collected significant amounts of money from oil companies for the underpayment of oil royalties, while Alaska's efforts have proven the most fruitful, collecting $3.7 billion in royalties, taxes, interest, and penalties. While individual states have been engaged in this fight for years, the federal government historically has turned a blind eye.

 

Accordingly, Rep. Maloney and POGO have mounted an all-out effort to persuade the Department of the Interior to initiate an aggressive collection policy based on insurmountable evidence detailing the underpayment of oil royalties on federal land. Given the overwhelming evidence detailing royalty underpayment East of the Rockies, it is both logical and imperative that the Department of the Interior initiate efforts to collect unpaid oil royalties from oil companies operating on federal land nationwide.


Individual states have focused their collection efforts almost exclusively on the onshore production of crude oil. The onshore production of oil annually provides the federal government with nearly $200 million in royalties -- of which, 50% is returned directly to the state from which the oil has been pumped. The federal government also collects all oil royalties due from the production of oil on Native American land. However, all royalties collected are returned to the specific Native American Nations from whose land the oil has been pumped. This is why Cobell v. Kempthorne, the Native American lawsuit seeking an accounting of unpaid royalties, which is unrelated to undervaluation royalties which states are collecting, is so important to Native people.


The offshore production of crude oil, on the other hand, provides the federal government with nearly $1 billion in royalties annually -- approximately 80% of these royalties come from the offshore production of crude oil in Louisiana. As royalties from offshore production are allocated almost entirely to the federal government, individual states understandably have not pursued them aggressively. Although the federal government receives a vast majority of its oil royalties from offshore production -- more than $9.4 billion in royalties from Louisiana alone in the previous ten years -- the Department of the Interior has not examined the under-pricing of crude oil offshore beyond California. As a result, nobody -- not the federal government, not individual state governments, and not private citizens -- has attempted to collect potentially hundreds of millions of dollars in unpaid oil royalties stemming from the offshore production of crude oil. (Source: www.pogo.org)





Venue for an Artist

Stopped Hating Thanksgiving and Learned to be Afraid

By Prof. Robert Jensen



I have stopped hating Thanksgiving and learned to be afraid of the holiday. Over the past few years a growing number of white people have joined the longstanding indigenous people's critique of the holocaust denial that is at the heart of the Thanksgiving holiday. In two recent essays (Raining On the Thanksgiving Day Parade and Give Thanks No More: It's Time for a National Day of Atonement) I have examined the disturbing nature of a holiday rooted in a celebration of the European conquest of the Americas, which means the celebration of the Europeans' genocidal campaign against indigenous people that is central to the creation of the United States.


Many similar pieces have been published in predominantly white left/progressive media, while indigenous people continue to mark the holiday as a "National Day of Mourning".


In recent years I have refused to participate in Thanksgiving Day meals, even with friends and family who share this critical analysis and reject the national mythology around manifest destiny. In bowing out of those gatherings, I would tell folks I hated Thanksgiving. I realize now that "hate" is the wrong word to describe my emotional reaction to the holiday. I am afraid of Thanksgiving. More accurately, I am afraid of what Thanksgiving tells us about both the dominant culture and much of the alleged counterculture.

 

Here's what I think it tells us: As a society, the US is intellectually dishonest, politically irresponsible, and morally bankrupt. This is a society in which even progressive people routinely allow national and family traditions to trump fundamental human decency. It's a society in which, in the privileged sectors, getting along and not causing trouble are often valued above honesty and accountability. Though it's painful to consider, it's possible that such a society is beyond redemption. Such a consideration becomes frightening when we recognize that all this goes on in the most affluent and militarily powerful country in the history of the world, but a country that is falling apart -- an empire in decline.


Thanksgiving should teach us all to be afraid.


Although it's well known to anyone who wants to know, let me summarize the argument against Thanksgiving: European invaders exterminated nearly the entire indigenous population to create the United States. Without that holocaust, the United States as we know it would not exist. The United States celebrates a Thanksgiving Day holiday dominated not by atonement for that horrendous crime against humanity but by a falsified account of the "encounter" between Europeans and American Indians. When confronted with this, most people in the United States (outside of indigenous communities) ignore the history or attack those who make the argument. This is intellectually dishonest, politically irresponsible, and morally bankrupt.


In left/radical circles, even though that basic critique is widely accepted, a relatively small number of people argue that we should renounce the holiday and refuse to celebrate it in any fashion. Most leftists who celebrate Thanksgiving claim that they can individually redefine the holiday in a politically progressive fashion in private, which is an illusory dodge: We don't define holidays individually or privately -- the idea of a holiday is rooted in its collective, shared meaning. When the dominant culture defines a holiday in a certain fashion, one can't pretend to redefine it in private. To pretend we can do that also is intellectually dishonest, politically irresponsible, and morally bankrupt.

 

I press these points with no sense of moral superiority. For many years I didn't give these questions a thought, and for some years after that I sat sullenly at Thanksgiving dinners, unwilling to raise my voice. For the past few years I've spent the day alone, which was less stressful for me (and, probably, less stressful for people around me) but had no political effect. This year I've avoided the issue by accepting a speaking invitation in Canada. But that feels like a cheap resolution, again with no political effect in the United States.


The next step for me is to seek creative ways to use the tension around this holiday for political purposes, to highlight the white-supremacist and predatory nature of the dominant culture, then and now. Is it possible to find a way to bring people together in public to contest the values of the dominant culture? How can those of us who want to reject that dominant culture meet our intellectual, political, and moral obligations? How can we act righteously without slipping into self-righteousness? What strategies create the most expansive space possible for engagement with others?


Along with allies in Austin, I've struggled with the question of how to create an alternative public event that could contribute to a more honest accounting of the American holocausts in the past (not only the indigenous genocide, but African slavery) and present (the murderous U.S. assault on the developing world, especially in the past six decades, in places such as Vietnam and Iraq).


Some have suggested an educational event, bringing in speakers to talk about those holocausts. Others have suggested a gathering focused on atonement. Should the event be more political or more spiritual? Perhaps some combination of methods and goals is possible.


However we decide to proceed, we can't ignore the ugly ideological realities of the holiday. My fear of those realities is appropriate but facing reality need not leave us paralyzed by fear; instead it can help us understand the contours of the multiple crises -- economic and ecological, political and cultural -- that we face. The challenge is to channel our fear into action. I hope that next year I will find a way to take another step toward a more meaningful honoring of our intellectual, political, and moral obligations.

 

As we approach Thanksgiving Day, I'm eager to hear about the successful strategies of others. For such advice, I would be thankful.


About Me: Robert Jensen is a journalism professor at the University of Texas at Austin, regular contributor to www.SleptOn.com and board member of the Third Coast Activist Resource Center. His latest book is All My Bones Shake (2009). Jensen is also the author of Getting Off: Pornography and the End of Masculinity (South End Press, 2007); The Heart of Whiteness: Race, Racism, and White Privilege (City Lights Books, 2005); Citizens of the Empire: The Struggle to Claim Our Humanity (City Lights Books, 2004); and Writing Dissent: Taking Radical Ideas from the Margins to the Mainstream (Peter Lang, 2001). He can be reached at rjensen@uts.cc.utexas.edu  and his articles can be found online at www.SleptOn.com and at http://uts.cc.utexas.edu/~rjensen/index.html.




 

 

Disgruntled feels: Empathetic! 10-year old Will Phillips has garnered quite a bit of media attention as a result of his refusal to say the pledge of allegiance, because of discrimination against gay Americans. According to young master Phillips, who appeared on CNN with his father, "I've always tried to analyze things because I want to be a lawyer. I really don't feel that there's currently liberty and justice for all." I say, "Welcome to the real world" Will! I must have been around seven or eight years old when I noticed the difference between the words of the pledge of allegiance and the treatment accorded my people. From that day forward, I remained silent when the pledge was routinely recited as part of our elementary school's daily indoctrination. Back then or even now, I cannot imagine a black child garnering so much favorable media attention for refusing to recite the pledge of allegiance. More likely, such a refusal would result in possible tasering and expulsion from school. Bottom line, I empathize with Will and trust he will be empathetic to the plight of not just gays, but others in this country that have historically been discriminated against.



Disgruntled wants to know: Leonard Peltier is the nation's best-known Native American activist. He has become a global symbol of US injustice and prison abuse. Imprisoned since the late 1970s for allegedly killing two FBI agents, Peltier has never received a fair trial, because federal authorities have quashed or destroyed evidence that might have freed him decades ago. According to Amnesty International, Peltier is a political prisoner whose avenues of redress have long been exhausted; he should be immediately and unconditionally released from incarceration. On November 5, President Obama met with Native American leaders, but there was no mention of the Nation's most well-known political activist. It appears that former Guantanamo detainees will receive trials and/or be freed, paving the way for the closure of the infamous prison on Cuban soil. One wonders, when will Mr. Obama look at political prisoners already on US soil and free them from the abuse and degradation of being incarcerated because they opposed US racist and discriminatory policies?



Disgruntled says: In 2006, the US Interior Department, under then-Secretary Gale Norton, awarded three lucrative oil shale leases on federal land in Colorado to a Royal Dutch Shell subsidiary. According to experts examining these contracts, Shell could net hundreds of billions of dollars over the course of the years needed to extract the oil. Prior to coming to the Bush cabinet as Interior Secretary, Norton was Colorado's attorney general and she represented mining, timber and oil companies as a private attorney. Two months after awarding the oil shale leases to Shell, Norton resigned her position as Interior Department Secretary. In December of 2006, Shell announced it had hired Norton as in-house counsel to its unconventional fuels division, which includes oil shale. The Interior Department investigators referred the matter with sufficient evidence of potential illegal conduct to the Justice Department, which launched an investigation into whether or not Norton illegally used her position to benefit a prospective employer. In addition to the Shell leases, Norton's tenure was marked by its close association with Jack Abramoff, the lobbyist and con man who pleaded guilty to defrauding Native American tribes and corrupting public officials. As the first cabinet-level Bush official to be investigated for wrongdoing while in office, maybe Norton will be the first to be found guilty and imprisoned for feathering her nest while violating the public's trust.