The DISH

Unbossed and unbought news and information you can use

Vol. 11 Issue 39…Dedicated to the Dialogue on Race…September 28, 2008

 

 

 

 

Intuit's Vibe

God Bless the Child

Billie Holiday



Them that's got shall get

Them that's not shall lose

So the Bible said and it still is news

Mama may have, Papa may have

But God bless the child that's got his own

That's got his own



Yes, the strong gets more

While the weak ones fade

Empty pockets don't ever make the grade

Mama may have, Papa may have

But God bless the child that's got his own

That's got his own



Money, you've got lots of friends

Crowding round the door

When you're gone, spending ends

They don't come no more

Rich relations give

Crust of bread and such

You can help yourself

But don't take too much

Mama may have, Papa may have

But God bless the child that's got his own

That's got his own



Mama may have, Papa may have

But God bless the child that's got his own

That's got his own

He just worry 'bout nothin'

Cause he's got his own







News You Use

Avoid Foreclosure Scams



White collar criminals have devised a number of foreclosure "rescue" scams that invariably leave consumers worse off than any actual foreclosure. According to a national survey, nearly ten percent of homeowners either behind on their mortgage payments or already in foreclosure will fall victim to these scams in often fruitless attempts to save their homes. Once behind on mortgage payments, the worst thing a homeowner can do is get into bed with crooks promising to stave off foreclosure.

From Washington State to the Sunshine State of Florida, these shady operators are bilking hapless homeowners of millions in fees and equity. In most cases, according to FBI reports, these shady operators either demand a fee for their non-existent services up-front and disappear or they employ a series of complicated transactions that basically strip the homeowner of any equity. No foreclosure rescue scheme benefits distressed homeowners.



Laws passed by a number of states against these fraudulent operations are generally ineffective, because as soon as a law is passed these white collar crooks devise sophisticated ways to skirt the new restriction. The most effective remedy rests in the hands of the individual. If you are late on a mortgage payment or are facing foreclosure, ignore unexpected solicitations, whether via mail, television, by telephone or in person. Contact your mortgage lender at the first sign that you will be unable to make a payment. Seek counseling advice. The US Department of Housing and Urban Development at http://www.hud.gov/foreclosure/ provides a nationwide list of certified counseling agencies.



As a general rule, no smooth operator will rescue you from foreclosure; pursuing their self-interest, these for-profit-operations are out to make themselves rich at your expense. Do not fall for a foreclosure rescue scam that will make your situation worse.







Bit of History

Adam Smith (1723-1790)



"His very limitation made for success. Had he been more brilliant, he would not have been taken so seriously. Had he dug more deeply, had he unearthed more recondite truth, had he used more difficult and ingenious methods, he would not have been understood. But he had no such ambitions; in fact he disliked whatever went beyond plain common sense. He never moved above the heads of even the dullest readers. He led them on gently, encouraging them by trivialities and homely observations, making them feel comfortable all along." Joseph Schumpeter - History of Economic Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press



Adam Smith, who is widely recognized as the father of modern economics was born to Margaret Douglas at Kirkcaldy, Scotland in June 1723. His exact birthday is unknown; his baptism was recorded on June 16, 1723. Smith's father, a lawyer and civil servant, also named Adam Smith, died six months prior to his birth.



From 1729 to 1739, Smith attended the Burgh School of Kirkcaldy, where he studied Latin, mathematics, history, and writing. At age fourteen (14), Smith entered the University of Glasgow, as was the usual practice, on scholarship. He later attended Balliol College at Oxford, graduating with an extensive knowledge of European literature and an enduring contempt for English schools.



On returning home, Smith delivered a series of well-received lectures and was made first chair of logic (1751), then chair of moral philosophy (1752), at Glasgow University. In 1759, Smith published The Theory of Moral Sentiments in which he first refers to the "invisible hand" to describe the benefits to society of individuals acting in their on self interests. Moral Sentiments would serve as the underpinnings for his later work. Smith's popularity increased with the book's publication.



In 1762, the University of Glasgow conferred on Smith the title of Doctor of Laws (LL.D.). However, the following year, he accepted a lucrative offer from Charles Townshend to tutor his young stepson, Henry Scott, the Duke of Buccleuch.



For the next two years, Smith traveled extensively with his pupil. During this period, Smith met and came to know a number of intellectual leaders; he also began writing another book. In 1766, Smith's tutelage ended and, with his pension for life earned, he returned to Kirkcaldy. For the next ten years, Smith devoted most of his time to writing his magnum opus An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations.



In 1773, Smith was elected fellow of the Royal Society of London and member of the Literary Club in 1775. On March 9, 1776, Smith published The Wealth of Nations. An instant success, it became the bible for market capitalism. In it, Smith expounded on the principles that lie at the heart of free market economics, i.e., division of labor, pursuit of self-interest and freedom of trade. As though guided by an invisible hand, free markets produce the goods consumers demand; the economy naturally achieves equilibrium.



In 1778, Smith was appointed commissioner of customs in Scotland and moved to Edinburgh. In 1783, he became a founding member of the Royal Society of Edinburgh and from 1787 to 1789, Smith served in the honorary position of Lord Rector of the University of Glasglow. Smith died on July 17, 1790. He never married.



Smith's literary executors were given explicit instructions to destroy his personal papers. Several works, including History of Astronomy (1795) and Essays on Philosophical Subjects, were published posthumously.







Bulls Stampeding Bears

By John Burl Smith



During the current stampede to bail out Wall Street, most Americans do not understand why other needs are being trampled to rescue the runaway credit market. Wall Street, like the rest of America, is awash in red ink. Over- exposure to credit has given investors shivers around the world. Practicing voodoo economics in their palaces high above the basic comprehension of Main Street, Wall Street gurus speak jargon that causes eyes to glaze over, hearts to pound and thoughts to swirl at the mention of derivatives, de-leveraging, liquidity, equity participation notes, LIBOR, breaking the buck, swap market, bridge loans, bulls and bears, etc. Casting bones, the chill its shaman gave Wall Street resulted in pneumonia on Main Street.



Trying to cure the jitters caused by over-exposure to credit, these "laissez-faire" witch doctors are prescribing heavy doses of liquidity - a placebo aimed at a symptom of the contagion. Now, rather than a mild case of sniffles, bailout advocates swear the economy is on its death bed.



Digressing, the earliest stages of voodoo economics began under Pres. Ronald Reagan. Praising the need for fewer restrictions on business, "laissez-faire" or "free-market" capitalism became a code word for deregulation. Republicans began crooning a tune of deregulation and Americans swooned every time they heard the melody. Following his election in 2000, George W. Bush teamed with Alan Greenspan, Chairman of the Federal Reserve, to form a duo. Bush sang lead with tax cuts for the rich and Greenspan chimed in with a mortgage financing jingle. The duet convinced Americans that a recession was imminent. Therefore, to put a little pep into the sick economy's step, Americans needed to go on a shopping spree.



Greenspan opened with a song and dance that urged Americans to use their homes like ATM machines. A chorus from Wall Street trilled the need for fewer restrictions on refinancing and mortgages for first time home buyers. Serenading Americans with a choral of easy credit, Wall Street and Main Street went on a spending spree. Spend now and pay later became the baseline for Bush's overture to Congress. Bulls on Wall Street loved the bull coming out of the White House. Pumping up stock prices, Wall Street bulls jumped on Greenspan's housing bubble bandwagon. Their crescendo push real estate prices through the roof. Appraisers kept the beat going by inflating real estate values and loan officers harmonized with exotic instruments.



Wall Street bears (those who take a conservative approach to buying stock) hit a sour note with bulls when they pointed out the inflated value of real estate, the ever increasing risk in the mortgage market and dangers ahead if the bottom fell out of the subprime market. Bulls excoriated bears, shouting them down for their refrain for restraint and opposition to cheap credit. Accused by bulls of trolling gloom and doom, bears were reduced to cantillating on street corners.



The Bush administration and Wall Street bulls used the media to stampede bears into virtual silence. Buying and selling mortgages, as orchestrated by Greenspan, meant money for anyone willing to sing along. Enjoying themselves like sunbathers on a Florida beach, there were bonuses all around; everyone from CEOs and mortgage brokers to loan originators and bundlers got rich; money covered Wall Street like a January blizzard.



Like a snowball rolling down a snow covered hill, the real estate bubble grew and grew and grew. Then one day the sun came out and began melting all that snow. Although the spring thaw had not begun, the subprime snowball melted and the back flow seeped into the subprime market. Clogging up-stream banks, the flood of bad debt continued to rise; major banks started going under. Lapping at Wall Street's door, the red tide infected beach goers around the world.



No longer dancing to sweet music, Wall Street bulls are singing the blues. Drowning in their excessive use of credit, they are pleading for bears to come to their rescue. Trampled by the stampede for riches, few bears are willing to bail out those whose reckless abandon disregarded warnings that a day of reckoning was coming. Most bears feel bulls are getting their just desserts because this should be the outcome in free-market, "laissez-faire," capitalism. Businesses should not only reap profits; they must take the bitter pill of losses as well. If businesses can get government doctoring to inoculate them against their bad decisions and actions, there is not any difference between America and China or Russia. Many of the people crying for a bail out are the same ones who opposed the federal government saving Social Security and Medicare or providing national health insurance, claiming it would be socialized medicine.



Stampeded by Bush into an illegal war in Afghanistan and Iraq, as well as his tax cuts for the rich, Congress is going to pay $700 billion to give a placebo to a patient with the shivers. The shame is Bush refused to provide taxpayers health insurance, while taking their tax dollars to bail out a private insurance company. The other absurdity in all of this is that Social Security taxes will be used to bail out a private company, while everyone is saying Social Security is going broke. When it does, who's going to bail out Social Security -- AIG?







Hood Notes

Lehman Brothers: The Asian Contagion US Style

By John Burl Smith



Troubles in the US financial market has caused a contagion that is spreading around the world. Almost no country is unaffected by overexposure to Lehman Brothers and what may grow into an economic pandemic. This survey reflects how Far East markets were impacted.



Regulators across Asia bolstered financial systems after Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. collapsed. The US investment house, reeling from $60 billion in toxic real-estate debt, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in New York on Monday (9-15-08). Once America's fourth-largest investment bank failed to secure an investment partner, the 158-year-old Wall Street firm was doomed. Investors were jittery after reports of a $4 billion third-quarter loss, but when Lehman Brothers said it would sell a majority stake in its investment management business, spin off a troubled mortgage unit and slash its dividend, all major Asian benchmarks went lower. News of the US government's seizure of mortgage lenders Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac wiped out gains from a regional rally on Monday. Tuesday morning signs of fallout from the bankruptcy were everywhere, as governments appealed for calm.



From Tokyo to Hong Kong to Seoul, operations of Lehman's local units were suspended and governments sought to reassure investors that the toll on regional companies exposed to Lehman Brothers would be limited. Lehman Brothers' Tokyo unit requested bankruptcy protection, while several Japanese financial lenders -- Aozora Bank Ltd., Chuo Mitsui Trust Holdings, Inc. and Chiba Bank among them -- said publicly their actual exposure was unaffected. However, Japan's Cabinet ministers, along with the central bank chief, held an emergency financial meeting and then the Bank of Japan injected 2.5 trillion yen, or $24 billion, into money markets Tuesday (9-16-08).



Nevertheless, Thursday Japan's key stock index sank to its lowest level in nearly six months as investors dumped banks and brokerage stocks. The Nikkei closed down 225 points, 1.98 percent to 12,102.50 -- its lowest close since March 18. Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc., the world's largest bank by assets, shed 5.07 points and the top Japanese brokerage Nomura Holdings, Inc. tumbled 5.94 percent.



Intensifying its monitoring of financial and foreign exchange markets, South Korea's central bank, Bank of Korea, provided extra foreign currency liquidity via the swap market to "calm nerves." South Korea's financial institutions had a total of $720 million exposure to Lehman Brothers.



Meanwhile the big story was in China. The mainland central bank cut a key interest rate Monday for the first time in more than six years. Hong Kong's monetary chief flushed more cash into the banking system during this "severe crisis" in global markets. Hua An Fund Management Co., one of a number of funds operating foreign investment funds under China's "qualified domestic institutional investor" or QDII program maintained a low profile, warning of potentially heavy losses but did not say how much might be at risk.



The jitters struck China Thursday as the Hang Seng Index in Hong Kong shed 3.1 percent to 19,388.72, its worst finish since March 20 last year. Heavyweight China Mobile, the world's largest mobile phone company for subscribers, hit a new intra-day low for the year as it tanked 5.3 percent. The Shanghai Composite Index fell 3.3 percent, while leading insurance firm China Life sank 8 percent and top China lender ICBC lost 3.4 percent.



Benchmarks in Taiwan and Singapore also lost more than 3 percent. Taiwan directed its state-owned banks and major funds to buy shares in an effort to stem heavy losses in the country's market, as regional equities plunged. Taiwan regulatory agency revealed that the country's institutional and retail investors held about 80 billion New Taiwan dollars ($2.5 billion) worth of exposure to Lehman investments. Taiwan's benchmark swooned 3.2 percent even though the government introduced a stimulus package to boost the struggling economy.



Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd said the nation's fourth-largest bank, Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd. had around $120 million exposure to Lehman; its stock dropped 4.3 percent Thursday. Commonwealth Bank of Australia Ltd. admitted to $122 million on its books and Australia's S&P/ASX 200 retreated 1.9 percent.



Elsewhere, India's Sensex lost 2.3 percent. Selling spread across most sectors, with banks, insurance companies and securities firms among the day's biggest losers. Regulators in South Korea, Hong Kong and Australia restricted or stopped operations and trading activities altogether of local Lehman businesses. By Thursday, Asian markets fell sharply as troubles at Lehman Brothers fanned fears of more credit-market losses, driving down financial company shares across the region. Volatile markets, pessimism about the financial sector and prospects for a sustained global slowdown are leading investors to move funds from stocks to safer waters such as cash or bonds, said Nobuhiko Kuramochi, general manager of the equity information department at Shinko Securities in Tokyo.



"Whatever good news you can think of -- nationalization of mortgage debts or lower oil prices -- doesn't seem to help the markets," said Henry Chan, team leader at Baring Asset Management in Hong Kong, who helps oversee about $11 billion in Asian equities. "It's confirmation that we're in the stage of a bear market. (Sources: www.tmcnet.com, http://business.maktoob.com, http://news.morningstar.com and http://online.wsj.com)







DISHing It Up Hot!

On Racism and Voting!

By Dot



By all accounts, Democratic Presidential candidate Senator Barack Obama should be well ahead in the polls, given the last eight disastrous years of George W. Bush and the Republican candidate's voting record, which has closely mirrored Bush's policies on war and peace. Yet, Senator John McCain is roughly even in the polls with Senator Obama. To discover the reason behind this conundrum, an AP-Yahoo News poll, in association with Stanford University, took a look at voter attitudes and found that more than forty percent of all white Americans harbor some negative perception of blacks. Moreover, more than a third of all white Democrats and Independents hold such negative views; these voters are less likely to cast ballots for a black candidate than whites that do not share such negative perceptions.



Personally, the results of this survey were not surprising. Anyone that knows the history of this country should not be mystified at the degree to which racism is still alive and well in America.



In the 1970s, Harvard biologist E.O. Wilson, the creator of the Encyclopedia of Life (EOL), endured a firestorm of criticism when he suggested that all animals, including humans, were genetically predisposed to certain behaviors and some were genetically superior to others. Naturally, "minorities" and women led the fight to discredit Wilson's work in this area. He was branded a racist. One can only assume these groups thought Wilson saw white men as the superior beings among us. This may or may not have been what Wilson was getting at, but he was denounced nonetheless as a sexist bigot.



Suppose Wilson's supposition was true regarding human evolution, then vestiges of the slavery conditioning of Africans brought to America to provide free labor in creating the wealth of this nation can be found in today's African Americans. Likewise, the mentality that produced this barbarous system did not disappear; it too evolved, such that today it finds expression among whites that believe blacks are "lazy" and must be driven to work in order to be productive members of society and/or some other stereotype, such as blacks are more violent than whites and must be caged or otherwise subjected to harsh policing to minimize their antisocial behavior.



From its founding, the US has been averse to allowing blacks to vote and in counting all black votes. This was aptly demonstrated in the last two presidential cycles. And, since nothing has been done to dismantle this system,2008 is unlikely to be any different. Given this, if Senator Obama becomes the next US president, it will be because white voters in overwhelming numbers decided to put aside their racist views and vote for him.







Disgruntled feels: Afraid! US politicians must believe US citizens have extremely short memories, think we are not paying attention to their machinations or simply do not care what we think. I am inclined to believe the latter. It is true that we are stressed over high food and gas prices, the declining value of the dollar and home prices, foreclosures and the other mundane day-to-day things we do to keep roofs over our heads and food on the table. But, we also pay attention, at least some of us do, to the things done in Washington and state capitols across the nation. Hence, we vigorously opposed the war in Iraq and Afghanistan and strenuously object to bailing out the merchants of greed on Wall Street. And, no amount of fear-mongering by George Bush and other Wall Street's surrogates will alter our objection. Sure, we are afraid, not of a coming depression, but further enslaving our children and grandchildren to an endless stream of debt while the rich folks that created this mess and their offspring continue to live large.



Disgruntled wants to know: When the current run of Wall Street bailouts began with Bear Stearns, there was a great deal of concern and conversation about moral hazard, the notion that decision-makers should not be insulated from risk for fear they will not avoid risky behavior. After all, in a capitalistic economy individuals freely choose when and how their resources are invested and incur profit and loss accordingly. Now that the Bush administration and members of Congress, Democrats and Republicans, have entered negotiations to buy bad debt to the tune of $700 billion in an historic bailout of Wall Street, in effect nationalizing private losses, there is no talk of moral hazard. Even more unusual, some of the nation's staunchest free enterprise advocates support the big bailout. Given this dramatic turn of events, can we officially declare US capitalism dead? More important, what theory of economics will the nation's colleges and universities teach future generations of Americans to explain the dynamics of the US economy.



Disgruntled says: Taxpayers should get more bang for their bucks in bailing out Wall Street, since the money that will be spent will take money away from domestic programs, like education, community services, poverty reduction and sustainable development that does not remove current residents. Wall Street firms, including Bear Stearns, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and AIG, that participate in the bail out should have to do substantial community service and development. For instance, they should use their expertise to help public schools that are in trouble, providing math and reading help. Programs could be set up so that their aids go where the problems are. They should not all help big cities like New York, Boston, Chicago, Washington D.C. or Los Angeles, San Francisco and Denver. This would get some of the best young minds, as well as some highly trained and well educated people into classrooms to help struggling student. This would put them in touch with real America, which may give them a sense of the situation in the real world of the inner city and small town USA.





Mailbox: E-Mails, Faxes and Phone Calls



Email www.msnbc.com ...Senate sends big spending bill to Bush to sign...Bill lifts offshore drilling ban, aids Gulf Coast disaster victims... Automakers gained $25 billion in taxpayer-subsidized loans and oil companies won elimination of a long-standing ban on drilling off the Atlantic and Pacific coasts as the Senate passed a sprawling spending bill Saturday. The 78-12 vote sent the $634 billion measure to President Bush, who was expected to sign it...The measure is needed to keep the government operating beyond the current budget year, which ends Tuesday. As a result, the legislation is one of the few bills this election year that simply must pass. Bush's signature would mean Congress could avoid a lame-duck session after the Nov. 4 election.



Email www.ap.com...WaMu becomes America's biggest bank failure...As the debate over a $700 billion bank bailout rages on in Washington, one of the nation's largest banks -- Washington Mutual Inc. -- has collapsed under the weight of its enormous bad bets on the mortgage market. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. seized WaMu on Thursday, and then sold the thrift's banking assets to JPMorgan Chase & Co. for $1.9 billion. Seattle-based WaMu, which was founded in 1889, is the largest bank to fail by far in the country's history.



Email www.findingdulcinea.com...Genetically Modified Meat Could Be Sold Unlabeled...by Sarah Amandolare....The U.S. government is considering allowing genetically engineered animals to be sold as food to consumers, but some feel that the lack of labeling could be a health hazard. Americans could soon be consuming fish that has grown unusually fast, or has particularly heart-healthy eggs, thanks to the US government. According to CBS News, federal officials have announced that they will begin "considering industry proposals to sell genetically engineered animals as human food." But consumers might not be receptive, despite government backing. A CBS News/New York Times poll in May 2008 "found that 53 percent of Americans said they wouldn't buy genetically altered food." At this point, manufacturers are not required by the FDA to label products containing modified ingredients, making it difficult for consumers to avoid them.



Email patricia2090@yahoo.com ...Dear Dish...Can you believe this! I recently heard a white caller to the Washington Journal blame blacks, he said "minorities," for the housing crisis. In particular, he believes the home loans given to minorities that probably did not work or had marginal jobs were the culprits. This cause of a global financial crisis ignores the avarice on Wall Street. The poor and middle class minorities and whites that received subprime loans and other mortgages played no role in bundling these mortgages and selling them as securities. They did not make the hundreds of millions of dollars the vultures on Wall Street reaped in betting the farm that their corrupt scheme would continue to produce record profits. Yet, some whites will blame "minorities," blacks, for this debacle. It is a sad commentary on the state of race in America. In the interim, rather than laying the blame squarely on the shoulders of the white men who created the scheme and earned the big bucks, some whites would blame the black man wiped out by the fraudulent enterprise trying to realize the American dream of homeownership.