The DISH

Unbossed and unbought news and information you can use

Volume 10 Issue 30…Dedicated to the Dialogue on Race…July 27, 2007

 

 

 

 

Intuit's Vibe

Monster

By Kay, Edmonton, Nicholas and Byrom



Once the religious, the hunted and weary

Chasing the promise of freedom and hope

Came to this country to build a new vision

Far from the reaches of kingdom and pope

Like good Christians, some would burn the witches

Later some got slaves to gather riches



But still from near and far to seek America

They came by thousands to court the wild

And she just patiently smiled and bore a child

To be their spirit and guiding light



And once the ties with the crown had been broken

Westward in saddle and wagon it went

And 'til the railroad linked ocean to ocean

Many the lives which had come to an end

While we bullied, stole and bought our a homeland

We began the slaughter of the red man



But still from near and far to seek America

They came by thousands to court the wild

And she just patiently smiled and bore a child

To be their spirit and guiding light



The blue and grey they stomped it

They kicked it just like a dog

And when the war over

They stuffed it just like a hog



And though the past has its share of injustice

Kind was the spirit in many a way

But its protectors and friends have been sleeping

Now it's a monster and will not obey



(Suicide)

The spirit was freedom and justice

And its keepers seem generous and kind

Its leaders were supposed to serve the country

But now they won't pay it no mind

'Cause the people grew fat and got lazy

And now their vote is a meaningless joke

They babble about law and order

But it's all just an echo of what they've been told

Yeah, there's a monster on the loose

It's got our heads into a noose

And it just sits there watchin'



Our cities have turned into jungles

And corruption is stranglin' the land

The police force is watching the people

And the people just can't understand

We don't know how to mind our own business

'Cause the whole worlds got to be just like us

Now we are fighting a war over there

No matter who's the winner

We can't pay the cost'

Cause there's a monster on the loose

It's got our heads into a noose

And it just sits there watching



(America)

America where are you now?

Don't you care about your sons and daughters?

Don't you know we need you now

We can't fight alone against the monster



About Me: Words and music of this song were written and composed by John Kay, Jerry Edmonton, Nick St. Nicholas and Larry Byrom. It was recorded by Steppenwolf in 1971. You can listen to a You Tube recording of it at http://youtube.com/watch?v=IovHdY6Rwaw.







Bit of History

Mollie Orshansky (1915 - 2006)

 

Born January 9, 1915 in the Bronx to immigrant parents, Mollie Orshansky attended Hunter College High School (1931). She received an A.B. in mathematics and statistics from Hunter College (1935) and continued graduate studies in economics and statistics at the Department of Agriculture Graduate School and American University.


In 1939, Orshansky began her long career of government service as research clerk with the US Children's Bureau; she worked on biometric studies of child health, growth and nutrition. In January 1942, Orshansky began work as a statistician in the New York City Department of Health; she worked on a survey of the incidence of, and therapies for, pneumonia. Three years later, she moved to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, where she spent thirteen years as a family economist, director of the Program Statistics Division, and a food economist.


In 1958, Orshansky joined the Social Security Administration as a social science research analyst in the Office of Research and Statistics responsible for analytical studies to measure income adequacy, family welfare and patterns of family income. In 1963, Orshansky developed Poverty Thresholds used in the United States as the official measure of poverty. Basically, she used the cost of a nutritionally adequate diet as the basis for a cost-of-living estimate and to calculate a cost of living for families of different sizes and composition.


In 1976, Orshansky received the Distinguished Service Award in recognition for her leadership in creating the first nationally accepted measures of income adequacy and applying them to public policy. The contributions made by Miss Orshansky to the statistical measurement of the low income population and the causal effects of federal programs on that population have earned her the affectionate moniker, "Miss Poverty."


After more than 40 years of government service, Orshansky retired from the Social Security Administration in 1982. Orshansky died in Manhattan on December 18, 2006. (Sources: http://en.wikipedia.org, http://aspe.hhs.gov, www.nndb.com and www.ssa.gov)






Politics Y2K7

John Edwards: Mr. Poverty?

 

Unafraid to examine the monster's underbelly, Democratic presidential hopeful John Edwards has cornered the politics of poverty and inequality. His message is simple: There are two Americas, one rich the other poor. As US president, Edwards has pledged to transform America by pursuing a national goal of eliminating poverty by 2036.


If implemented, Edwards' Working Society Initiative will reduce by 12 million the number of people living in poverty during the first decade of his administration with the goal of ending poverty for some 37 million Americans by 2036. His initiative calls for the creation of one million temporary minimum wage jobs for willing workers that cannot find jobs because of where they live, lack of skills, experience, and references, or other obstacles like criminal records or bad credit. With the assistance of local business and labor leaders, these jobs will be carefully chosen to serve local needs without displacing existing workers.


The Initiative calls for an increase in the minimum wage to $9.50 an hour by 2012 and future minimum wage increases by indexing it to automatically increase annually along with average wages, ensuring that all workers share in the economic growth and prosperity of this nation.


Edwards' plan creates economic opportunities in rural communities hard hit by the loss of US manufacturing and textile industries, strengthens labor laws, fights predatory and abusive payday lending practices, expands access to bank accounts for the poor and assists low-income workers save more through "Work Bonds."


Given the high cost of housing, Edwards' plan calls for overhauling the Department of Housing and Urban Development to make housing policy a force for economic opportunity. His plan creates one million new housing vouchers over five years to let low-income families choose to live in neighborhoods closer to jobs and better schools.


No proposal to reduce poverty is complete without a focus on education. Edwards' initiative calls for strengthening education with a national College for Everyone Program that helps students that work part-time pay their tuition. His plan creates second-chance schools for high school dropouts to help these individuals get back on track, expands access to preschool programs, invests more in teacher pay and training, and strengthens high schools with smaller schools and a more challenging curriculum.


Finally, Edwards' initiative will focus on promoting responsible families by helping poor fathers find work to support their children, expand the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC), reduce its marriage penalty and fight teen pregnancy.


The Working Society Initiative is the most comprehensive plan to date presented by a presidential candidate to tackle poverty. It effectively makes Edwards "Mr. Poverty."





News You Use

Poverty in America


Much like its pattern of unemployment and income inequality, there is a pattern of poverty in the United States that dates back to the nation's founding and its embrace of bond slavery. The US is a nation addicted to cheap labor. And, like addicts in general, it denies its addiction while doing whatever it can to feed its habit.


Every time someone mentions poverty and the need to alleviate the debilitating problem for the sake of the national social fabric, those who benefit most from cheap labor practices, the nation's elite, scream bloody murder and charge those daring the raise the topic with "class warfare." While embracing corporate welfare, these folks oppose any government programs to improve the lives of the poorest Americans, including the minimum wage.


It took a decade to get the latest increase in the minimum wage, which went into effect on Tuesday (7-24-07). The increase from $5.15 to $5.85 an hour, with two more increases over the next two years to $7.25, means these full-time workers will finally earn $12,168 a year. Since every dollar of these wages are subject to the 7.65% Social Security and Medicare tax, their disposable income before any state or federal tax is withheld is trimmed down to less that $11,300.


The 2006 federal poverty thresholds for a single individual, two persons and a family of four were $10,295, $13,166 and $20,615, respectively. Depending on where you reside, these figures do not capture the economic distress of the working poor trying to make ends meet.


For a more in-depth look at poverty in America, visit www.povertyinamerica.psu.edu/. The site features a Living Wage Calculator, an atlas of where pockets of poverty are located in America, analysis and much more.





Disgruntled says: The names have been withheld to protect the innocent. This practice is commonplace in the USA; simply fill in the names that apply in you area. "White police officer X will not be charged in the shooting death of black suspect Y. An internal investigation concluded that officer X acted properly in discharging his weapon. While unarmed, suspect Y made a threatening motion, had a cell phone, wallet, etc., causing the officer to fear for his life." Only in the black community is there protest over this senseless killing. Ironically, had the same officer shot a dog the outrage would be broadcast around the world. But, in these cases, the victims are generally young black men living and dying in a society where they are valued less than dogs.



Disgruntled feels: Flawed! This week, George W. Bush delivered another major "war on terror" speech. Titled "Al-Qaeda in Iraq," he mentioned the group ninety-five (95) times in a twenty-nine minute address in his attempt to show the organization is, was and has always been in Iraq. Bush criticized those that doubt his assertion, accusing them of flawed logic. Of course, Bush did not mention the fact that al-Qaeda is the US-created monster used to bankrupt Russia in Afghanistan in the 1990s. In addition, he failed to mention that it was made up of mostly Saudis, like Osama bin Laden and the alleged 9-11 hijackers, not Afghanis and certainly not Iraqis, the people being punished, while the US sells more arms to Saudi Arabia. Flawed logic is the only way to explain how the US got into two wars on the heels of 9-11, wars that consist mainly of protecting oil fields and a gas pipeline, and neither is against Saudi Arabia!



Disgruntled wants to know: According to mainstream media, black folks are enamored of Bill and Hilary Clinton. Many have already decided to vote for Hilary in the Democratic Party primaries in their respective states. Some misinformed blacks even call Bill Clinton the first "black" president, because his two terms in office represent the best of times for blacks in the United States. Simply based on the improvement in the economic status of blacks, this "love" of Clinton is misplaced. Sure economic conditions for blacks improved; it was boom times for the entire country. Yet, if you look at the economic status of blacks relative to whites, blacks just ran in place as they have done since the birth of this nation. Moreover, Clinton, with his war on drug policing, helped to incarcerate tens of thousands of young black people. Placed in proper perspective, what is there left to explain the fascination of blacks with the Clintons?





Michael Vick and the 3/5 Compromise

By John Burl Smith


The dictionary treats human, humane and humanitarian as synonyms, words having the same or nearly the same meaning. Individuals or people collectively, human is essentially a classification term to identify the specie that exhibits the characteristics- form, nature, or qualities -Homo sapiens. Humane expresses a qualitative experience such as kindness, mercy or compassion, whereas humanitarian describes one's actions to manifest such concerns and qualities. A recent controversy brought this word to the top of the 24-hour news cycle.


Ironically, during this time when young Americans and Iraqis are dying in ever increasing numbers, US poverty is at the level of a crime against humanity, the prison industrial complex through the criminal justice system has put slavery on the US stock market and proportionally, more blacks are in jail than are in college, dogs are of greater concern in the news than human beings. It's not surprising that a young man, who has been trained and taught most of his life that not only is it acceptable to hurt and inflict pain on other humans it's a prerequisite to becoming a professional football player, would treat animals with even less concern. Moreover, the better you are at inflicting pain, brutality and outright savagery, the more money you will make, while becoming a larger than life sports icon and hero.


Taking over the media, animal rights activists are hydrophobic, demanding before any evidence is presented that Michael Vick not only be thrown in jail, but be prevented from practicing his profession This controversy smacks of outright racism and an agenda, reminiscent of white people's reactions to Jim Brown, Mohammed Ali, Richie Allen, Hank Aaron, Reggie Jackson, Barry Bonds and the 1968 Olympic track team (Harry Edwards, John Smith, and John Carlos), etc. Whites hold blacks to a 3/5 Compromise standard, which means blacks have only the rights whites are willing to grant at the time. No black man has the right to determine his behavior, attitudes, personality or own himself.


The US Supreme Court in the Dred Scott case decided that black people were property and had no rights a white man was bound to respect. Dogs are property, and according to Dred Scott and Plessy v Ferguson property has no rights that can be enforced on human beings. Property is for the use, enjoyment and disposition of the owner. Owners do not have to consider any impact on property. Rights are for humans; therefore, no animal can be given any status that supercedes a human's right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.


It is civilized and falls within conventions of humanitarianism to have laws about how animals should be treated, but conventions are not rights. For those, animals have to get in line in the US. Black people in the US following Plessy v Ferguson (1891) were used like dogfights to entertain whites. Crowds of whites as large as one hundred thousand participated in lynching black men. These public murders were advertised in newspapers like sporting events. Dogs fighting can never be as horrible and inhumane as lynching another human being for entertainment sake.


Lynchings weren't the acts of single individuals or small groups of individuals; these were societal actions. Lynchings made political careers, covered up the theft of property and ridded whites of black opposition.


The 3/5 Compromise of Article I Section II in the US Constitution is the basis of Dred Scott and Plessy v Ferguson cases; dogs are not mentioned in the Constitution. So, what is the source of these rights animal lovers are claiming dogs have. Some pet lovers treat animals like people and treat people like animals.


Police officers shot, beat, strangle, pepper spray and suffocate black men daily somewhere in the US, but these same people, who insist that animals have rights and must be treated humanely, see police killing blacks as justifiable homicide, regardless of the circumstances. And, they would take away a human's right to make a living because they don't treat dogs like they have human rights.


The US government has refused to sign the International Convention on Human Rights, but animal rights activists are not upset that some humans will not be treated humanely. Animal lovers apparently don't love people as much as they love animals. For them, police killing black people is acceptable because they don't see blacks as humans. Hurting other humans playing football is also acceptable, but humans that don't treat dogs humanely must be punished. The only question remaining is, are the Atlanta Falcons and the NFL as racist as animal rights activists? I remember Warwick Dunn and his campaign to help victims of Hurricane Katrina. The NFL's response was downright anemic compared to other aid requests. Now, it's three-fifthing Vick!!!!

 

 

|| 2007 Issues || The DISH ||