MARTA
Tax_Sucks.Com
Below is a listing
with links to all the articles on MARTA which appeared in The DISH (Dot's
Information Service Hotline), as well as a letter to the editor of the Atlanta
Journal-Constitution and a proposal for South DeKalb rail service submitted to
the MARTA board. This web site is being developed to provide Atlanta, DeKalb and Fulton Counties'
taxpayers a voice in what happens to MARTA.

A Regional Transportation Tax
By
John Burl Smith
Lamenting a $600
million shortfall, Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority (MARTA) General
Manager Nathaniel Ford declared expansion has reached a point of diminishing
returns. Agreeing, the Atlanta Journal-Constitution (2-24-03) outlined former
Georgia Gov. Roy Barnes' sleazy and illegal takeover of MARTA, the DeKalb and Fulton Counties'
publicly owned transportation system. The facts show that the Georgia Regional
Transportation Authority (GRTA) is to blame for MARTA's $600M shortfall.
Forecasting an
epiphany for local leaders, the AJC outlined a new vision of equitable regional
transportation funding. However, such pronouncements do not allay fears of
"business as usual." Considering "business as usual," in
January, Wayne Hill began "unofficial" private discussions with the
"usual suspects," Atlanta Regional Commission (ARC) members. On
February 11, 2003, MARTA representatives met with Fulton County Commission
Chairman Mike Kenn, ARC board members, developer Tad Leithead and Roswell Mayor
Jere Wood. This cabal scheduled a retreat to be held the following day at Callaway Gardens. The retreat's attendees
rubber-stamped the ARC's transportation decisions made at
"unofficial" meetings without public comment.
The new
transportation proposal includes a one-cent regional sales tax; it does not
repeal the current MARTA one-cent sales tax, which is levied in DeKalb and Fulton Counties.
This proposal creates still another GRTA-type board to oversee the funds.
MARTA was not
mentioned in order to avoid speaking in public about the need to compensate
DeKalb and Fulton
residents for their many years of supporting MARTA, while people like Wayne
Hill made careers opposing public transportation. Classic taxation without
representation, MARTA's one-cent sales tax is the sole source of dedicated
public transportation funding. DeKalb and Fulton residents pay it for everyone.
Yet, no one presents their views or represents their interests in making public
transportation decisions.
The history of
MARTA's financial problems is well known, and this new proposal is another
GRTA. First, Barnes' plan called for the 13-county region to come under GRTA's
board; it was supposed to replace the ARC. Secondly, it made DeKalb and Fulton County
residents solely responsible for paying MARTA's one-cent sales tax. Over their
objections, Barnes claimed MARTA as the regional transportation hub, but
refused to compensate DeKalb and Fulton residents, its owners. Supported by
legislators, like Vernon Jones, now DeKalb CEO, Barnes assumed MARTA's purse
strings, giving the state total control of all federal mass transit funds
coming to Atlanta (MARTA). This allowed the state to use the MARTA tax as
matching funds to qualify for public transit grants and to repay bonds. Even
though it is prohibited by law from giving MARTA one cent, through GRTA's
takeover, the state diverted MARTA funds to start up bus service for Clayton
and Gwinnett. This created MARTA's $600M shortfall.
A slap across
South DeKalb residents' faces, Barnes forced MARTA to rescind plans to build an
I-20 rail line and to redirect it west to service Cobb and Douglas Counties,
which do not pay the MARTA one-cent sales tax. However, the most egregious
aspect of this outrageous episode is the state's refusal to compensate DeKalb
and Fulton County residents for taking their
publicly owed transportation system, which they supported. Other counties that
are now enjoying its benefits refused to pay the MARTA tax. Adding insult to
injury, under Barnes, the legislature extended the one-cent MARTA tax levied
only on DeKalb and Fulton
Counties until 2047.

MARTA:
Fare Hike?
There is no
question that south DeKalb taxpayers do not support the proposed MARTA fare
increase! In The DISH survey of 1,630 south DeKalb County
residents, the majority 83% opposed the MARTA proposed fare increase. Of those
who use MARTA as a primary source of transportation, 49% thought the fare was
already too steep. Poor people with shallow pockets, they say they have to dig
deep to afford the current fare. Denied rapid rail, they are stuck with
time-consuming buses. Homeowners, some 71% of the respondents, believe the
MARTA sales tax should be eliminated. These taxpayers are concerned and wonder
why they pay this tax, when the service it affords is given to others, who
refused to approve the referendum that created MARTA. Now, with a proposed fare
increase on the drawing board, MARTA's decision to raise the fare will be made
by interests in Clayton, Cobb and Gwinnett Counties where the MARTA sales tax
is not even imposed.
South
DeKalb residents bear the
greatest share of the burden of financing MARTA, yet this portion of the county
has the least amount of say so in how MARTA spends tax dollars collected from
county residents. This is taxation without representation. With silence from
our elected representatives, MARTA officials can plan to give us buses, rather
than the rail we paid for and continue to subsidize for other non-MARTA sales
tax areas and nothing is said. This situation makes south DeKalb synonymous
with a cash cow. Remember when cotton was king before the cotton gin? Slaves
were put in the fields to till the soil and pick the cotton. Now, people's
incomes from jobs are farmed like cotton; the system use fines, fees, taxes and
imprisonment to suck people dry. South DeKalb
residents are the obvious victims of this kind of neo-slavery.
South DeKalb
residents demand rapid rail to downtown Atlanta, the same level of rapid rail
service that is available leaving downtown Atlanta headed to other areas,
especially northern DeKalb and Fulton Counties. South
DeKalb residents oppose the MARTA proposed fare increase.
Moreover, they demand the removal of the MARTA sales tax, since they have
fulfilled the original referendum obligation, and the legislature illegally
extended the life of this regressive tax without putting the matter before
voters in a referendum.

Legislation,
Letters, Route Proposal & Lawsuit
Senate Bill Creating GRTA
How State Legislators Voted on GRTA and MARTA Sales
Tax
Tax Revolt! Letter to AJC
Letter to Laura Lawson
Proposed So. DeKalb Route
Request to Georgia Attorney General Thurbert
Baker
MARTA
Lawsuit

Articles
on MARTA Published in The DISH
The DISH Volume 3 No 3
The DISH Volume 3 No 4
The DISH Volume 3 No 7
The DISH Volume 3 No
10
The DISH Volume 3 No
12
The DISH Volume 3 No
14
The DISH Volume 3 No
23
The DISH Volume 3 No 38
The DISH Volume 7 No 14
The
DISH Volume 12 No 19

Run Children Run

THINC || The DISH